- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Dec 8, 2000
User Score
4.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 55 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 23 out of 55
-
Mixed: 6 out of 55
-
Negative: 26 out of 55
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MarkS.Jul 5, 20062This was real bad. When snails died and the lead actor went to his knees screaming noo, I was embarrased to be sitting through the performance.
-
-
DavidF.Aug 29, 200510
-
-
JiachiDec 14, 20051
-
-
BoomerC.Aug 5, 20020
-
-
CoanA.Aug 5, 20026Sure, the movie was not terribly great, but hardly deserved the harsh reviews its gotten. It was amusing, but could of been done better. As for the critics up there, how can you rate a film, when you cannot spell basic words like "roll" (see washington post review, "role" instead of "roll").
-
-
BillH.Jul 11, 20011I came into this movie bout 10 minutes late and I didn't get it at all. Which dragons? Until the very last scenes all I could say was. Where are the friggen dragons?
-
-
DaveC.Jul 18, 20032The flattest adventure movie I've ever seen. Thora Birch is awful and so are the rest of the cast. Thank goodness Lord Of The Rings came to make up for this tosh.
-
-
GioR.Mar 5, 20061This movie is only funny/cool if u have ur friends watching it with u making funny comments!!! If not, u can take it to the supreme court for cruel and unusual punishment.
-
-
MonicaSep 6, 20060The only film that I ever walked out on and demanded my money back. Just awful.
-
-
DanG.Jul 15, 20013Good idea, dreadful acting!
-
-
CameronE.Jul 27, 20014The acting really sucked, but the plot was good. I didn't get what happened at the very end of it.
-
-
HelgeA.Jun 5, 20022
-
-
MikeM.Aug 4, 20020Total shite, considering the long awaiting movie of the game w/ same name..the movie contained a shocking number of gaming mistakes..almost as if the makers of the movie were not even aware there was a game at all.
-
-
R.G.Aug 1, 200310Wicked.
-
-
ChrisN/AApr 29, 20040Why was this made, and why was a friend cruel enough to make me watch this?
-
-
NickBJun 3, 20052
-
-
JBAug 11, 20060
-
-
BobS.Aug 1, 20068It was really cool. Not the best but cool. The specail effect were good in spite of everyone else's comments.
-
-
samtam90Apr 19, 20074Pros: Jeremy Irons' performance, some D&D elements were nice, it's (quasi-)decent for an action/adventure movie Cons: everything else; basically, calling this a D&D movie is ridicolous.
-
-
KevinG.Jan 23, 20087I enjoyed the movie. It had the remnant redeeming qualities of a bad 80's sci-fi or fantasy movie, which I love. The story isn't terrible, the acting is pretty good (Save for Jeremy Irons completely overacted, even for a maniacal genius, role.
-
-
ChaotixDec 17, 200210
-
-
KumariJan 31, 20020The trailer looked interesting when I went to see Charlie's Angels, so I rented it. I watched about 30 mins. of it until another movie came on tv that I would rather watch. I never went back to finish it, it was so unappealing and uninteresting.
-
-
Nov 6, 20105a major disappointment for a video game adaptation.
-
Nov 20, 201110It's so terrible it's funny...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
-
Apr 19, 20132
-
Feb 14, 20138This is one of those movies that is so bad that it's awesome. The overacting is hilarious, the CG is laughably bad, and the characters are completely out of place for the setting. This is definitely worth watching if your looking for a bad movie to laugh at and make fun of.
-
0At once laboriously expository and defiantly incomprehensible.
-
20Good intentions, bad writing.
-
10A cheap "Star Wars" rip-off with swords instead of light sabers.