Metascore
64 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 33 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 33
  2. Negative: 1 out of 33
  1. 100
    Fast Food Nation has the dramatic flatness and willful lack of personality of some documentaries -- or at least how Linklater thinks a documentary should be. The movie nonetheless feels like both a work of investigative journalism and an immense human-interest story, veering into muckraking, horror, teen comedy, and what passes for "Twilight Zone" science fiction.
  2. Viewers expecting a blistering attack on the fast-food business, or an Altmanesque panorama, will be disappointed, but it's a sensitive and humane piece of work.
  3. 90
    Like two of the year's other standout American films, Kelly Reichardt's "Old Joy" and Ryan Fleck's "Half Nelson," it's a movie of ideas in which the ideas flow effortlessly out of the material instead of being plastered on top with a heavy cement roller (as in "Crash," "Babel" and "Little Children").
  4. Naturally, a subject this right-on draws a right-on cast. Kris Kristofferson, Avril Lavigne, and Ethan Hawke pitch in.
  5. Fast Food Nation offers no easy answers, but plenty of food for thought.
  6. Reviewed by: Don R. Lewis
    80
    Through it all, Fast Food Nation never really preaches to viewers, it just lays ideas out there. In that respect, it's every bit a talky, philosophical Richard Linklater movie.
  7. If Linklater regards the fake culture that has replaced real places with horror, he has nothing but respect and affection for his characters, and the movie is rescued from nihilism by his humanistic view.
  8. 80
    It's a mirror and a portrait, and a movie as necessary and nourishing as your next meal.
  9. Many reviews have suggested that this is as politically mild as a John Sayles movie, but Linklater clearly agrees with the frustrated kid who says, "Right now, I can't think of anything more patriotic than violating the Patriot Act."
  10. 75
    It's less an expose of junk-food culture than a human drama, sprinkled with sly, provoking wit, about how that culture defines how we live.
  11. Linklater's working-class mosaic is seriously interested in how most of this country gets by for a living. And that, sadly, makes it distinctive.
  12. Fast Food Nation picks up, and drops off, various members of its cast, sometimes without a satisfying resolution. But its final scenes, inside a real working meatpacking plant, on the killing floor, are brutally to the point.
  13. Reviewed by: Ethan Alter
    75
    What sets Fast Food Nation apart from other recent multi-character studies like "Crash," "Bobby," and "Babel" is that Linklater doesn't set up a single incident that ties all the story strands together.
  14. 75
    The result is a hodgepodge: not as unpleasant as the alleged foodstuffs described in Schlosser's book, but not exactly prime rib.
  15. 70
    A more materialist (and successful) ensemble film than the mystical "Babel," in that everyone is connected through the same economic system, Fast Food Nation is exotic for being a movie about work.
  16. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    70
    Richard Linklater's rough-hewn tapestry of assorted lives that feed off of and into the American meat industry is both rangy and mangy; it remains appealing for its subversive motives and revelations even as one wishes its knife would have been sharper.
  17. It's a bold proposition, and the resulting film has some powerful moments and strong performances, but it fails to be an involving or satisfying drama, and it's not half as effective as the book in creating outrage over what junk food is doing to us.
  18. 67
    Less a movie than a political act, Fast Food Nation aims to disseminate its counter-propaganda to the widest possible audience, which is the only plausible reason why the book has been shoehorned into a narrative instead of a documentary.
  19. 63
    Fast Food Nation would have benefited from a longer running time -- the movie often feels like it's missing big chunks of plot -- but Linklater's cautionary message gets through.
  20. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    63
    Presenting facts in a wrapper of fiction only muddies the waters, and many of the film's subtler points are likely to slip by viewers who haven't first read Schlosser's book. Other salient points are shoehorned into the dialogue, rendering key scenes preachy, heavy-handed and dramatically inert.
  21. 63
    One of the great frustrations associated with Fast Food Nation is the way it drops subplots.
  22. Reviewed by: Damon Wise
    60
    A gross and engrossing attempt to humanise a hot-button subject, using a star-sprinkled cast to reveal some unpalatable truths.
  23. It gets the job done and then some, but it's ugly and clumsily shaped, and every scene is there to rack up sociological points.
  24. Works far better as journalism than as drama. One weakness is that poor Linklater has to keep bringing in guest explainers, who lay out one policy or another but have nothing whatsoever to do with the story.
  25. Following up on Morgan Spurlock's wildly successful indie film "Super Size Me," critics of fast food were hoping that a one-two punch would further raise consciousness among consumers and purveyors alike. Alas, Fast Food Nation is punchless.
  26. Dispiriting, unsubtle and unpleasant.
  27. For all the filmmaker's good intentions, Fast Food Nation isn't a particularly good movie. It doesn't hold together or grip you the way a documentary might have.
  28. Reviewed by: Jason McBride
    50
    A frustratingly toothless film whose heart is in the right place even if its head isn't.
  29. 50
    The movie is designed to stir up controversy. (Linklater and Schlosser have admitted as much.) But can you really stir up controversy with a lesson plan?
  30. 40
    As a character-driven narrative, it's a hollow beast, too often pedantic, that smacks of good-guy agitprop, shrill when it should be subtle and shrieking when a whisper would be far more unnerving.
  31. Reviewed by: Dana Stevens
    40
    Even if you swear off burgers forever, it won't make Fast Food Nation's characters come to life.
  32. 40
    The movie is halfhearted, fragmentary, unachieved.
  33. 12
    If I wanted to spend $10.75 making myself sick, I'd buy a bottle of cheap tequila.
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 27 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 16
  2. Negative: 7 out of 16
  1. 6
    Good movie! Good story line and gives you something to think about for sure. Greg K is great again but one surprising performance from none other than Bruce Willis. Here is a guy whom I typically dislike in movies giving a great performance as a sales account jerk. Totally worked for me and very believable.... perfect role for him. It's too bad he doesn't take these smaller type of roles more. Give up the main role action hero Bruce... it doesn't work for you anymore and has been pounded into the ground!! Full Review »
  2. ThaiK.
    1
    Any book or video that exposes corporations as totalitarian top down non-democratic highly subsidized immoral institutions must receive some merit for their input toward social responsibility. This film hints at this concept. However, there is no question that the book this film is based on deserves substantial recognition for the effectiveness of clarifying this terrible reality of corporate interference that bleeds into society like an unseen plague. Just the one fact highlighted in the book, not mentioned at all in the movie, that details how the corporate sector has gone from advertising on the sides of busses to editing and providing school books that 'compromise' topics of health when fast food is mentioned should be enough to frighten the general population into learning much more about these parasites. The film is a terrible attempt at portraying anything near the value of the book, but like I said, any hint or mention of the nasties that go on because of the highly concentrated power in the corporate sector is worth something. My main suggestion is to please read the book. After that read another and another. Any book of any lean, right-left-middle, doesn't matter since learning is the reason for reading. Television and mass media, your own newspaper, all market what they want you to become by providing highly censored content. Books are usually written by passionate people with real purpose behind their concerns for society, just like Eric Schlosser's Fast Food Nation - the book, not the movie. Full Review »
  3. Swan
    0
    I can't believe I paid $4.71 at Blockbuster to rent this excuse for a movie. And I can't believe I watched the entire thing. Nothing in this movie felt seemless. Most of the storylines are left completely undone--in an annoying way, not a contently ponderous one. (Did Raul take the meth? Did the cows ever get out of the fence?) There are just too many things going on. What's-her-face decides to be an "individual", but all she really becomes is part of the whiny hippy crowd with squeaky-voiced Avril Lavigne who recites the obvious complaints about the powers that be. Redundant, boring. Every scene was too long and I absolutely hated the soundtrack. Also, why was the focus on MANEUR in the burgers the whole time? There are so many other thing wrong with factory farming. I feel like the bloody scene at the end was supposed to make up for lack of story in an "artsy" way. Instead, it ended up being irrelevant except for the gag reflex. Overall, I hated this movie and I want a refund. Then, I want to give my refund to Morgan Spurlock, who truly deserves it. Full Review »