Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 34 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 34
  2. Negative: 17 out of 34
  1. One of the best of its streamlined, over-produced, double-clutch kind: a high-speed, slicker-than-slick car-chase movie with unexpected deposits of character and comedy.
  2. A film where suspense and exhilaration are incompatible, and a receding plot line is merely the platform for cars to fly through panes of glass.
  3. 63
    Her star billing notwithstanding, Jolie has perhaps the ninth-largest part in the movie (behind seven humans and a dog), playing Cage's ex-girlfriend.
  4. 63
    It's a pretty good ride even if it blatantly steals some of its best stunts from "American Graffiti" and "Grease."
  5. 60
    What does it say that we have a closer relationship with the car than with the characters? It says Bruckheimer.
  6. I found it more pleasurable as a time waster than either "Mission: Impossible."
  7. 50
    This is the kind of movie that ends up playing on the TV set over the bar in a better movie.
  8. 50
    In the end, for all its auto-erotic flair, Gone in 60 Seconds is missing a money shot.
  9. The story is unbelievable and phenomenally silly, not a good combination.
  10. 50
    A tepid disappointment that contains one mediocre chase scene and a lot of wasted talent.
  11. 50
    This new version is mindless hot-rodding fun, especially for those with a weakness for vintage cars hurtling down city streets, a group whose members include -- sigh -- me.
  12. This retread has been bloated far beyond its B-movie origins, beefed up with more characters and an all-star cast, stripped of any real suspense and loaded down with music cuts and one-liners aimed at pleasing a crowd of rowdy male teenagers.
  13. 40
    The car stunts are ridiculous, all lightning-fast editing and computer enhancement -- by the time action is this far removed from reality, who cares?
  14. 40
    A time-waster with some enjoyably empty zip.
  15. 40
    A product that will delight car junkies and drive cinephiles to swear off film until fall.
  16. Reviewed by: Tom Keogh
    So mired in his own ludicrous equation for contemporary action pictures that it's constantly stuck in first gear.
  17. Reviewed by: Robert Horton
    This film, a remake of a hapless 1974 cheapie of the same title, can't even get the big chase right.
  18. 38
  19. Interesting and idiotic elements almost exactly balance each other.
  20. Written in 60 Seconds would be a more appropriate title.
  21. 30
    Doesn't just look and sound like a car commercial. It is a car commercial.
  22. It's barely a movie at all, more like a thousand car commercials spliced together in an hour.
  23. It has a tendency to run ragged and spends an unhealthy amount of time idling pointlessly at intersections.
  24. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    In this film we learn that it takes 8,000 lbs. of pressure to crush a car but only one credited screenwriter (Scott Rosenberg) to pound out such a lame script.
  25. I'll tell you what's gone in 60 seconds, all right: my attention.
  26. There were moments when I thought Gone in 60 Seconds might be a passably entertaining movie. I figure those moments, strung end-to-end, would total 30 or 40 seconds.
  27. 30
    Does boast, as a major plot point, a dog's bowel movement. And things do go 'boom!' quite spectacularly and frequently enough to distract from the truth that there is virtually nothing going on in this whole movie that Nintendo hasn't done better.
  28. How did a dignified pro like Duvall get stuck in this fender-bender?
  29. A mindless, cliche-riddled action-cartoon, a blur of metal and fire and screeching tires, with bad dialogue, cardboard characters and a volume set so high, it makes the Indianapolis 500 sound like chamber music.
  30. Proves a theory first advanced in the movie "Repo Man": The more you drive, the stupider you get.
  31. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    The flat tire of summer movies.
  32. Eventually, the senses jam and a mental lube job is in order.
  33. Reviewed by: Editor
    Perfectly dreadful in every respect.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 72 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 28
  2. Negative: 4 out of 28
  1. Nov 12, 2012
    Laughably bad, brain-melting action goo.
  2. Feb 25, 2012
    a stupid movie about criminals doing horrible things. It is not about the love of cars, it is about some bastard criminals stealing them. Horrible movie in my opinion. It's also a bad influence on young people, glorifying criminals. Always the same **** Horrible disgusting action scenes involving criminal activities. Doesn't interest me a bit. Why always the same nonsense? Full Review »
  3. Jun 29, 2014
    All the actors in GI60S are tailor made for the movie. Mainly Jolie, Cage, Duvall, Ribisi and Patton are outstanding. Cage's younger brother Kip accepts a job from a dangerous thief. He botches the job and Cage has to save his life by boosting 50 cars in a few days. The action is well done and it is one of Cage's best movies. A very underrated movie that delivers the goods to the audience. Full Review »