- Studio: Dimension Films
- Release Date: Aug 5, 1998
User Score
8.2
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 44 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 40 out of 44
-
Mixed: 1 out of 44
-
Negative: 3 out of 44
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
ScottNJun 7, 200910
-
-
JoJoApr 19, 200410Fully Sick, Hallowen H20 Rocks, I love how he comes back and just walks the school, For 1 REASON, To Kill His SISTER. In Ressurection, Why the hell wouldn't the girl tell the god damn police she saw Michael through the window. I wouldn't do it. I mean He walked its halls, he dreamt in its bedrooms, he killed in that house. Fully Sick.
-
-
GilbertMulroneycakes:ANewBeginningNov 1, 20037
-
-
KatrinaG.Oct 28, 200310It is scary because you don't know where he is all the time and it can get scary and suspenseful great movie i give it a thumbs up.
-
-
bobby-joeb.Feb 3, 20059Pros: great acting, every moment is scary, screenplay actually makes sense (unlike most other horror's these days) cons: the bastard just never dies does he? Some sadly predictable moments my thoughts: One of the best contemporary horror movies out there. if its a scare you want this movie suplies.
-
-
ChristianS.Aug 8, 20099Tied up with 1981's Halloween II, the second best in the series. Jamie Lee Curtis is back and it gets better. The whole film is very suspenseful and creepy from start to finish.
-
-
patrickJun 11, 200510Yay!
-
-
GeorgeWJan 14, 200810This is a great film. One of the best thrillers ever made. It's actually much better than the first, in my opinion. This film is quite thrilling, the music made it thrilling actually. The best thing about it is that it scares us rather than showing us gore and stuff like that. Oh yes, the gore is minimal, there's also no sex/nudity. Great film!
-
-
Nov 6, 20109very nice sequel to the original
-
Jan 8, 201110this is movie is awful, it falls flat on its face so much, the storyline where micheal tracks his sister down and now stalks her at a school is terrible, the actors are GOD awful!!! except jamie lee curtis, the whole movie was just a big waist of time i will admit that their are some good parts but thats it, not worth the time
-
Jul 30, 20113wow. can we get any gayer? YES! its called halloween resurrection! i cant even believe jamie lee curtis signed on to this abomination of a film. not only does michael myers' mask make him look like he has down syndrome, but nothing about this movie is scary. NOTHING.
-
Aug 12, 20117
-
Dec 22, 20113It was ok. Still a little too generic for my taste and the acting was pretty horrible too. The kills werent all that good either. Takes far too long to get into as well. Just another generic addition to the series.
-
Mar 11, 201210Amazing movie! A direct sequel to "Halloween II." This (like other "Halloween" movies) doesn't get enough credit for bringing something new to cinema. I love it!
-
Dec 9, 20127
-
50He can take a licking and keep on slicing. In the latest Halloween movie, he absorbs a blow from an ax, several knife slashes, a rock pounded on the skull, a fall down a steep hillside and being crushed against a tree by a truck. Whatever he's got, mankind needs it.
-
60For horror film devotees eager to know how this unseasonable visit from the darker spirits of autumn rates, frankly, it's more marketing trick than moviegoer treat.
-
30The 20th-anniversary sequel to the groundbreaking horror film-and the sixth in an increasingly awful series about the bulletproof murderer Michael Myers-is a styleless and predictable affair.