Metascore
57 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 27 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 27
  2. Negative: 1 out of 27
  1. Reviewed by: Josh Rosenblatt
    78
    Anyone can come up with jokes about incestuous rednecks or pubic hair that "looks like Osama bin Laden's beard," but it takes guts to make a comedy in which the Indian-American hero accuses an African-American TSA agent of racial profiling, all so he won't get caught smuggling weed onto a plane.
  2. It's not exactly high art, but it's certainly high.
  3. Reviewed by: Jenni Miller
    75
    At the screening I attended, someone walked in wearing a shirt that read "I HEART BONGS," so that gives you a pretty good idea of the target audience. Maybe this time they will rouse themselves from the couch and make it possible for us to follow Harold and Kumar through more adventures.
  4. 75
    The big payoff, of course, is Neil Patrick Harris reprising his role as "Neil Patrick Harris."
  5. 70
    Honestly, the most shocking thing put forth in Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay just might be the proposition that George W. Bush is actually a pretty cool guy.
  6. 70
    That rare sequel that builds on the movie that came before it without crushing its attributes to death. "Escape" doesn't feel belabored. Giddy, freewheeling and sweet-natured, it pulls off the effect of seeming spontaneous, a tall task by itself.
  7. 70
    Precisely because their attitudes are so bluntly hedonistic and apolitical, Harold and Kumar manage to be fairly persuasive when they get around to criticizing the status quo, which the movie has the wit to acknowledge itself as part of.
  8. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    70
    Harold and Kumar are pothead patriots in the first feel-good torture film.
  9. Reviewed by: Joe Leydon
    70
    An over-the-top and beyond-PC comedy that sometimes deftly, sometimes slapdashedly infuses party-hearty anarchy with hectoring moral outrage.
  10. 70
    They are Abbott & Costello with dirty mouths--indomitable, ungovernable, and possibly immortal.
  11. Harold and Kumar, fortunately, never lose their verbally relentless way of delivering raunch as pure common sense.
  12. 63
    If only the wit weren't overwhelmed by lame jokes about body parts, functions and fluids.
  13. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    63
    Mostly, Harold is a guilty pleasure that retains the anarchic charms of the original.
  14. 63
    The movie is unpolished, unabashedly un-PC, and takes on as many "sacred cows" as it can uncover in a slightly-too-long 105 minutes.
  15. No political tract, but it can be surprisingly bold.
  16. 60
    The jokes all revolve around weed, stereotypes, and Neil Patrick Harris; the stereotype stuff is by far the funniest.
  17. Reviewed by: John DeFore
    50
    Lacks the fresh charm that made their first such an unexpected (if guilty) pleasure.
  18. You find yourself smiling at some of the bits, wincing through many, many others, and ultimately wondering if the pacing would've improved had either H or K developed a terrible cocaine habit.
  19. 50
    Among the variations of gags from the original are a threesome involving Harold, Kumar and a giant bag of marijuana.
  20. 50
    Is a truly political stoner movie even possible? The entire point of getting high is to take some of the sting out of life. The movie goes after easy targets and goes soft on the harder issues.
  21. It can devote itself entirely to bodily functions or, having established its grossness quotient, take the high road toward satire like its 2004 predecessor, "Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle." It fails mainly because it does neither.
  22. Mostly dumb, no matter how desperately and even valiantly it aims for "thinky."
  23. It exploits post-9/11 anxieties as fodder for goofball gooniness. "Dr. Strangelove" it's not.
  24. The movie is sporadically funny in an anarchistic way. But Cho and Penn don't have the needed personality or comic identity to sustain a franchise and their non-drug humor is so crude and scatological that -- to say the least -- it leaves a very bad taste in the mouth.
  25. It's a big fat missed opportunity.
  26. Reviewed by: Dana Stevens
    40
    It betrays the spirit of the stoner comedy, which has traditionally been subversive--when it wasn't detailing the love affair between two marginally functional young men and their stash of sweet, sweet herb.
  27. 30
    A largely mind-numbing experience.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 106 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 31 out of 52
  2. Negative: 16 out of 52
  1. RichardS.
    2
    This movie is so damn stupid that anyone who thinks its brilliant or amazing must be brain-damaged. What makes this movie good? The disjointed plot (it's called Escape from Guantanamo Bay, but is that what the movie's really about, or is it going from one place and joke to another without any real point?) The bad acting (from the whole cast)? The lame, stupid jokes (was there anything intelligent about the humour)? Is it funny cuz of the constant references to drug and sex: if you find that funny then may be you're still a teenager, even though the movie's not for kids. The terrible attempts at satire? The inspiring music? Seriously, think about it: does Harold and Kumar have the makings of a good movie? And by good I don't mean one of those serious dramas that are usually Oscar contenders. I mean good in the sense of normal good, like most Pixar or Dream Works comedies. This movie sucked and blowed at the same time. Full Review »
  2. I can only imagine that the director of this movie was so high that he think that been high is to cool that actually could be funny, this movie is to racist, stupid and extreme that sucks my score is 2 out of 10 Full Review »
  3. This movie keeps you interested and entertained. Their was nothing extremely memorable about the movie but this movie pointed out a lot of possible stupidity that the government may be functioning on from the intelligence agencies to the president. The movie poked fun at many things but I found it to be more of an exposing of some situations that are not always as it seems. For example I found the funniest part in the movie to be the bong scare on the plane. Full Review »