• Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint
  • Summary: In this third installment of the series, the infamous Sirius Black has escaped from the dreaded fortress of Azkaban and is headed straight to Harry Potter.
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 36 out of 40
  2. Negative: 0 out of 40
  1. Reviewed by: Susannah Gora
    100
    Soars gloriously into fluency and magic.
  2. 100
    The Prisoner of Azkaban is to Harry Potter what that other No. 3, "Goldfinger," was to James Bond: the movie that takes the invention and gamesmanship of the series to a whole new giddy peak.
  3. 60
    Cuaron lets his enthusiasms show.

See all 40 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Negative: 73 out of 324
  1. A change happened. They made the third movie a good one. Who'd knew, that adding stuff into movie that wasn't in the book, would make this film better? I give it a high 8 out of 10. Expand
    • 3 of 3 users said yes
  2. KarlK.
    4
    It's not as magical as the first two films. The sounds were also very poor, it doesn't seem to compliment the mood of the scenes. The only thing I liked about the movie was the environments were more detailed. Over-all, it was a bit disappointing. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. AustinM.
    3
    This one just doesn't give me that feeling the first two gave me and it lacks the action of the 4th and 5th films. By far the worst so far.
    • 3 of 15 users said yes

See all 324 User Reviews

Related Articles

  1. The Best and Worst Time Travel Movies

    The Best and Worst Time Travel Movies Image
    Published: March 23, 2010
    We've traveled through the history of cinema to uncover the best and worst time travel movies -- as well as everything in between. Where do your favorites stand?