- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Nov 9, 2001
User Score
4.7
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 23 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 9 out of 23
-
Mixed: 5 out of 23
-
Negative: 9 out of 23
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
TeeKJan 21, 200810
-
-
DarrelG.Jun 9, 20022
-
-
SethB.Jun 9, 20027It was a bit long, and in love with it's own dialouge. Other than that I thought it was fine. The other reviews here are so poor because they like clean cool criminals and bank robbers who get away scott free and whom for everything works out. I hesitate to say this, but if you know anything about real heists you know this is how it generally goes down.
-
-
MichaelF.Nov 10, 20014
-
-
JinC.Nov 16, 20016Mamet's hit or miss and when it's a miss, it ends up being a poor man's Tarantino. Not a bad movie but not great. Great cast is generally wasted. But his wife is hot.
-
-
MarcB.Nov 21, 20014This movie had all the potential to be greater than it turned out to be. Devito was his nasty self and Hackman is still trying.
-
-
A.YannyDec 1, 20013Yet another Mamet film where eveyone gets double crossed so many times you start to lose track. In the end, I don't feel outsmarted, I feel like I've been outlasted with one mechanical back-and-forth plot twist after another.
-
-
LeeY.Apr 27, 20023
-
-
HenryB.Apr 6, 20022Unbearable dialogue, miscast characters (devito), and an absurd cutesy plot make this one of the worst films of the year.
-
-
BangkokDaveJul 26, 20021
-
-
YoonMinC.Sep 26, 20037Solid acting and directing but tiresome script of conjobs and counterjobs which Mamet has done much better in the past, namely in the astounding House of Games. This movie is an empty exercise, everyone going thru the motions. Soon unpredictablity becomes predictable and like the story of "never cry wolf', we begin to doubt everything and not care when we finally see who comes on top.
-
-
PatC.Jan 8, 20044Entrancing thriller without the baggage of stimulating original thought afterwards.
-
-
CaptainCraigFeb 20, 20053Definately not Hackmans best work. The film would get rolling along pretty good for a while , then get stupid. So many doub-crosses you knew it was a twist movie...which is not the way to make a twist movie.
-
-
BrianC.Nov 16, 20014Very disappointing - Although Gene Hackman is always good, the plot is really weak and I'm not all that hard to please! Wait for it to come out on video!
-
-
RossW.Mar 14, 20021This is the worst movie ever. This movie should be called a comedy because some of the lines in the movie are so bad that I was laughing my ass off.
-
-
JeanpaulM.Mar 15, 20021
-
-
ShaunJ.Nov 11, 20018This was a great film, I enjoyed it all the way through. The characters are the reason to watch, although the plot is good and the dialogue is cool too.
-
-
AndyS.Nov 15, 20013
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
50Even a mediocre David Mamet movie is still a David Mamet movie. That means there are lines to savor, partly because the lines are so good, partly because they are so Mamet.
-
60Solidly entertaining and surprisingly free of the Mamet-isms that can suck the life right out of the most tightly crafted story.
-
90Mamet loves two things: scams and dialogue. This movie is rich with both.