- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: May 6, 2005
User Score
5.0
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 73 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 37 out of 73
-
Mixed: 8 out of 73
-
Negative: 28 out of 73
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
FFensterMay 6, 20051
-
-
DenisCOct 30, 20058Very efficient, scary at some parts, love the special effects of certain shots. I recommend this movie for those who love to be seated on the edge of their seats. Don't drink and watch, you will spill your drink in a matter of time!!
-
-
ShawnMay 7, 20058
-
-
betsya.May 5, 200510Great movie.
-
-
MattP.May 5, 20050
-
-
GregH.Apr 29, 20059A cut above the standard and a whole lot better than I expected. Scared the crap out of me! Bring on the sequel!!!
-
-
VinceH.May 25, 20057
-
-
GuyC.May 2, 200510
-
-
BenVMay 5, 20050The worst "horror" "film" ever. Now you expect me to say some stupid pun about Paris Hilton's acting, but that's be a waste of time for a waste of a time movie. This movie should be burned!
-
-
AlP.May 5, 20050This horror of this movie is that anyone would shell out good money to see something that put no effort into evoking real horror, but resorts to the "BOO", see our special effects... "BOO again!" Early in the movie the group is camping, the breeze brings in a pungent odor, and someone says,"Ugh! What's that smell?" That smell is the rest of the movie. Pure trash!
-
-
MarkG.May 6, 20051It's pretty obvious I work for the production company!! I'm trying in vain to start a positive whisper campaign!!! Check out my exclamation points!!!! And my patently fake names!!!!!!
-
-
MawkD.May 7, 20058Very fun movie to see. It was worth paying the matinee fee but not really worth the full fee. Still it was very entertaining and gross but it was fun to watch. People who are looking at real character depth and an awesome story line will be disappointed, but who the hell would look for that when going to see a horror movie?
-
-
JoeL.May 7, 20054Somewhat long. not scary at all, a little gory. don't waste ur money.
-
-
KevinMay 8, 20056We saw this at an 8pm showing. Everyone in the theater apllauded when Paris met her end. How appropriate she died on her knees. Paris on the Video Camera was tounge in cheek as well.
-
-
KennyMay 8, 20052House of WACK!!!
-
-
TonydannieJun 19, 20051
-
-
tracyi.Jul 10, 20059Great film.
-
-
SteveS.May 7, 20073Not scary and dull. I kept pausing it and walking away.
-
-
JimS.Dec 28, 20053I expected this movie to follow in the footsteps of the orignal classic House Of Wax. Totally disappointed with screenplay and artwork.
-
-
AndyW.Oct 31, 200510
-
-
SeanS.May 10, 20057A fun horror flick, with a cool cast.
-
-
SaerA.May 11, 20058House Of Wax delivers what every horror fanatic wants. Its a very fun movie to see. It's probably not that scary like other horror movies, but some scenes whould make you jump. But I really enjoyed it.
-
-
LaurenD.May 15, 20056For a crappy cheesy horror film it wasn't terrible and it somewhat enjoyable at times.
-
-
RichardC.May 2, 200510House of Wax rocks it the best true horror film of the year!
-
-
JeremyMay 26, 20057This is a really funny movie, i was laughing so hard durring it. I saw about 5 shots of the freaking microphone overhead, it was so funny. You should rent this movie if you want to see a comedy, i suggest it. microphone... omg.
-
-
MikeMay 6, 200510This was so much better than the last horror movie I saw the awful The Grudge. The Grudge was like Gigli and this is like Titanic.
-
-
BillW.May 6, 20058I give it a 10+ for the wish-fulfillment it provides of Paris Hilton's demise (some in the audience, me included, burst into spontaneous applause). A 6 for better than average (but only just) execution of standard slasher conventions.
-
-
BrandonE.May 6, 20059I really enjoyed this movie!!
-
-
RobertBMay 8, 20050I wish I was one of those people who rated this movie an 8 or above. I really, really do. Clearly the theater that they were at mixed up the movies and showed them something good. The actual House of Wax was horrendous, one of the worst horror movies I've seen in a while.
-
-
rachelj.Jun 14, 200510Its great.
-
-
MichelleW.Jul 1, 20050Actually I didn't see this movie, but just knowing that Paris Hilton was in the movie which I heard she was not very long in the movie made me want to puke. Ya. ((She sure achieved alot so far)) Not really. Paris all I have to say is get a clue. With your one big eye and enormous feet.
-
-
ScottM.Jul 1, 20054Not a bad ride for a teenage slasher movie. Plot goes nowhere, but at least the movie does not pretend to be something it is not.
-
-
WallyS.Dec 8, 20056The remakes just keep getting worst, and here it achieves the unnatural gift of beeing stupid and dreadfull, the teens have no skill, and even though the art direction is excellent, everything else is trash.
-
-
LaurenS.May 13, 20050
-
-
ChadS.May 14, 20057
-
-
jayJun 18, 20055A mediocre effort...there are some genuine "boo!" moment, but the movie hardly works.
-
-
AndrewB.Feb 28, 20071
-
-
Mar 8, 20117The plot is admittedly predictable at parts, and the cast a bit generic, but this movie gives it to you in a way few others have. Tense and gory scenes interlocked with a consistent pace that picks up plot pieces and sets them down for later with brilliant efficiency make this a solid, enjoyable horror film.
-
May 29, 20115
-
Nov 14, 20115The film makers do a really good job of creating characters whom you wish would shut up and die so when the time comes for their horrific deaths you are relieved. Its also not a good thing that Paris Hilton is the movie's most convincing actress either. The set and props of the House of Wax scenes were pretty good but mostly misused. Just another lamed out horror movie.
-
Sep 26, 20113The wax statues were well-done as well as the ghost town. And I must admit that I had some chills but, even them weren't enough to compensate the bad acting (except for Cuthbert) and poor storyline.
-
Jan 28, 20127
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
50The problem is that the writing is too weak for me to come close to recommending it.
-
30Related to the 1953 Vincent Price film in name, embalming technique and Warner Bros. pedigree only, the new House of Wax is a dreary, predictable tale.
-
25Overlong, unscary, poorly paced and banally written.