- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Apr 4, 2008
User Score
5.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 35 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 22 out of 35
-
Mixed: 5 out of 35
-
Negative: 8 out of 35
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Jan 20, 20125George Clooney gives his all to make this an old fashioned romp and a good time. However, Kranski is to inexperienced to pull of his role and Zellweger is toxic in hers. In the end it's not good, bad, funny or sad. It's just boring.
-
AdamA.Oct 2, 20087Entertaining, but not great. However, being the only film about early football wins it some points.
-
-
JayH.Sep 17, 20087Enjoyable old fashioned film, good pace, fine cast. The period detail is good and the art direction, costumes and cinematography are great. Very entertaining and fun.
-
-
JasonR.Apr 21, 20080I walked out after about 30 minutes so I can not give a detailed review. From what I saw was Hollywood making a high marketed low budget film with an experienced cast that had to fulfill their contractual obligations. Piece of garbage...
-
-
IrisApr 20, 20089I really liked the movie. I expected it to be a bit more screwball comedy in it. Nevertheless, it was a nice balance between a comedy, romance and sports movie. I'm getting so tired of the sexual, gross out comedies. It was quite nice to see a comedy with some elegance, intelligence and sweetness to it.
-
-
DonnieH.Apr 17, 20081What was up with Renee Zellwegger in this movie? She looked all puffy. But a bad movie all in all. I agree its ripping off movies no one wants to see anymore.
-
-
SheilaM.Apr 15, 20085I like both the stars, Clooney and Zellweger, but the script did not serve them well. It put my husband (an incredible football fan) and me to sleep! Very disappointing! I can not imagine using such terrific actors in a movie with great potential and a lacklustre script.
-
-
ChadS.Apr 9, 20084
-
-
DavidG.Apr 9, 20080Clooney has turned in to the movie equivalent of a cover band. Vomiting back genres of pictures no one goes to see any more. Clooney is a few pictures away from doing tv again.
-
-
emmylouApr 8, 20086
-
-
FranceL.Apr 7, 20089Terrific period sets, great music, fine cinematography, rapid fire dialogue, a dash of slapstick, and a few very funny moments combine for entertainment well worth the ticket price.. And did I mention George Clooney?
-
-
ChrisC.Apr 6, 20083Not funny at all.
-
-
Mr.C.Apr 6, 200810Funny ! This Movie is very wonderful!
-
-
KathyS.Apr 5, 20088"Leatherheads" is perfectly cast, well-acted, beautifully directed, and gorgeous to look at. This is a fun movie that both men and women can enjoy.
-
-
HalB.Apr 4, 20086
-
-
RichardM.Apr 4, 20087
-
-
67Too much of Leatherheads feels like studied motions, and its charms never plaster over a story that takes forever to get going, and doesn't go too far once it does.
-
50Sidelined by a script that plays like an imitation of another era’s artifacts. It’s an oxymoron: a mild screwball romance.
-
There's a flatness about the whole enterprise -- like drinking champagne, but from an old house slipper. Re: his performance, Clooney is terrific. His comparison to old movie stars is not just hype. He really does possess the combination of supreme confidence and humility that has been the hallmark of the biggest male Hollywood stars.