Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Look
User Score
tbd

No user score yet- Awaiting 1 more rating

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 3
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 3
  3. Negative: 1 out of 3

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. JayH
    Apr 26, 2009
    5
    Interesting premise, but the plot has one big major flaw..since when do security camera's have sound?! It does tend to fascinate none the less, but also wears thin after awhile.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. jimeheat
    Oct 11, 2010
    0
    This movie exonorates people causing other people great anguish and misery, and uses this as entertainment. It is not original, artistic, or witty. I think it should be illegal for anyone to make films depicting criminal acts against children, whether it's obvious or implied. This movie doesn't give you the element of fiction or fantasy like a good horror movie. People that are mentally ill might see these kind of movies and do the same things themselves. I believe in people dying of natural causes, having families that stay together , maybe even going through life without crime involved. People don't have to be religious to be good, and there's more good people in this world than bad. I never felt so strongly this way until I had kids of my own. I think a good human being should only produce things they would be proud to show their own young kids. Sure there can be adult horror movies, or artistically made tasteful movies that are for adults only, but if they are horror - there is an element of fiction. Maybe this movie sends a moral message of what not to do in life, but its crude. Human suffering should not be portrayed as comical entertainment or irony !… Expand
  3. vidkid
    Mar 24, 2012
    8
    One cannot watch Adam Rifkin’s LOOK without seeing the meta-movie inside of it: US. Even if one dismisses the mini-"stories" that the movie is comprised of, as contrived or poorly written—as some have done, (but not this reviewer)--one is also dismissing the fact that the movie is more than just about the characters in it, but about how we behave and the world we live in. Rifkin has created a brilliant movie about the world around us—seen solely through the eyes of surveillance cameras--about how we act in the world around us and how we perceive or mis-perceive things. Rifkin’s greatest feat here is how skillfully he juxtaposes the half a dozen or so vignettes so that we--and not the characters--get to see the whole picture of what is happening. The film is both a “mockumentary” of our daily lives, and a cautionary tale with the message: we are ultimately responsible for all of our actions. Ultimately, it is the primer for the excellent television show--also created by Rifkin--that followed shortly thereafter and which rivals the original movie’s ability to grab us and compel us to keep watching.… Expand
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
50 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 9 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 9
  3. Negative: 1 out of 9
  1. Variety
    Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    50
    Conceit often stretches -- and breaks -- the limits of what the tales can handle, though the implication of viewers as voyeurs gives pic a subversive edge.
    Read full review
  2. Village Voice
    Reviewed by: Aaron Hillis
    50
    Look isn't processing, critiquing, or even warning; in the end, it's just recording.
    Read full review
  3. The New York Times
    Reviewed by: Matt Zoller Seitz
    50
    An unsettling, rudely funny but not entirely credible feature.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »