- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: May 2, 2008
User Score
4.6
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 38 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 16 out of 38
-
Mixed: 6 out of 38
-
Negative: 16 out of 38
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Mar 3, 20120By-the-numbers material about a closeted, currently-in-denial homosexual man (my opinion only and not necessarily that of the film) named Tom who decides to selfishly destroy the upcoming wedding of his friend because he decides at the last second that he wants her all to himself. All the "chick flick" cliches are in place and quite dull to behold. Wait... why am I even reviewing this???
-
bWilbyOct 18, 20097
-
-
CapoRegimeOct 13, 20093Too generic, same old same old romantic comedy. What made this apart from being one of the worst movie are the characters of Michelle and Patrick.
-
-
AshleyP.Feb 18, 20092Formulaic and not all that funny. The only saving grace is that up until the end, Michelle Monghan makes a fairly likeable character and has agreeable chemistry with Patrick Dempsay. Completely predictable though.
-
-
RoseS.Oct 3, 20080Predictable, bland, and we are expected to root for the cad who flaunts the fact that he chases every woman he sees. And Hannah cheats on Colin with Tom and we're still supposed to care about what happens to her? I didn't. What creeps.
-
-
ConradG.Sep 18, 20080Completely unfunny and non-entertaining from start to finish. Word.
-
-
JayH.Sep 11, 20086Predictable but cute, I think the reviews are a bit harsh. Michelle Monaghan is charming, but Patrick Dempsey as some irresistible stud is a bit far fetched. Funny and enjoyable.
-
-
MarkC.Jul 30, 20080To make money and get cheap ignorant laughs from tired, old, ugly, and FALSE stereotypes about gay people is not admirable. It's the opposite of that. A boring, senseless, pointless, ignorant movie. Minutes wasted.
-
-
RienyeN.May 8, 20085The movie will keep you occupied for the better part of it. Some funny parts although its entirely predictable. Good date movie to take your girl to.
-
-
ChadS.May 4, 20086
-
-
StephD.May 4, 20080A man as a bridesmaid...semi-creative, I give that. A man as a bridesmaid played for stereotypical and cheap laughs...stupid.
-
-
JennaT.May 4, 20080What a homophobic piece of trash. A waste of film. Homophobia was so last century, to be gay is NOT to be feminine, and finally...absolutely not funny. Stop pushing stereotypes and cheap laughs, movie producers and directors. Just like P.S. I Love You and other recent cheap crass unfunny movies, gay guys or being played are played for cheap laughs. Have some creative jokes for a change.
-
-
DaveW.May 3, 20082This movie is completely inappropriate for children 16 and younger. It is a cheesy modestly entertaining chick-flick that relies on an unnecessary surplus of suggestive sexual innuendo to keep the 18-22 year old crowd giggling. I was disgusted in the PG-13 Rating.
-
-
[Anonymous]May 2, 20080Utterly boring and predictable. Not funny at all.
-
-
AlanB.Apr 29, 200810Funny and entertaining from start to finish.
-
-
40A strong opening, bursting with wit and vigour, gives way to a predictable, patronising and immensely lazy second half. Could have been so much more.
-
Director Paul Weiland and the three (!) screenwriters it took to boil down thousands of bad movies into 101 minutes haven't provided this one with a single original thought; it should only entertain those still getting adjusted to the idea of talkies.
-
70Has something a bit edgier in mind than the usual, soft-focused wedding bell high jinks. For the most part, that's exactly what it delivers -- an amusing, smartly cast romantic comedy told from a guy's perspective.