Metascore
40 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 20 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 20
  2. Negative: 5 out of 20
  1. Reviewed by: Sarah Kaufman
    70
    This film does other power-of-dance movies one better by downplaying the dancing and underscoring what its brethren often lack: a compelling, wrenching and wonderfully inspiring story.
  2. 67
    As absorbingly weird and dark and sad as the film becomes, it still labors against jumpy construction, an irritating variety of visual styles and film stocks, and a crowded story that no one gets much individual screen time, which means that redemption for everyone comes far too quickly and neatly.
  3. 63
    Expanded by writer-director Randall Miller from a nostalgic half-hour short he made while a student at AFI, this well-intentioned film about loss, grief and new beginnings gets bogged down in syrupy cliches and blunt self-help dialogue.
  4. Reviewed by: James Greenberg
    50
    The film is an elegiac journey to a sweeter, more civilized place in the heart. Predictable and decidedly old-fashioned in its sensibility, the film is likely to win over audiences if not critics.
  5. 50
    The adults at the Hotchkiss reunion are played by an assortment of splendid actors.
  6. Reviewed by: Sid Smith
    50
    Too cute, too transparent, too precious and ultimately too much.
  7. The movie delivers the promised ballroom action, but not the charm. And if you think the title is endless, wait till you see Goodman's death scene.
  8. 50
    Overall it's got two left feet - and charm is in dangerously short supply.
  9. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    50
    The story is corny and predictable, but Carlyle's subtle, nuanced performance saves the movie from drowning in sentimentality.
  10. 50
    I wish I could say there is something pleasurable in watching John Goodman reminisce about the good old days while impaled on a steering wheel in the Volvo he's crashed on a California freeway, but I can't find what it is.
  11. Really, about all that unifies the movie is its inclination to turn little people's dreams into limply ''affectionate'' camp.
  12. Three movies gasp for life inside the clumsily titled Marilyn Hotchkiss' Ballroom Dancing & Charm School.
  13. Reviewed by: Toddy Burton
    40
    Several steps shy of a satisfying lesson.
  14. Reviewed by: Jeannette Catsoulis
    40
    Despite a gloriously baroque performance from Mr. Wahlberg - attempting moves certified only for Antonio Banderas - Marilyn Hotchkiss Ballroom Dancing and Charm School remains irredeemably soggy.
  15. This has its moments, but most of these are engulfed by the overall murk.
  16. 38
    Amounts to Chicken Soup for the Soul-style torture -- unless you like that kind of thing.
  17. Reviewed by: Robert Abele
    30
    It's all a treacly, shoddily assembled, underwritten mess.
  18. Reviewed by: Rob Nelson
    30
    This flat-footed male weepie musters an insurance ad's worth of clichés about the importance of busting a move in middle age-and it strains so hard to do so that it's almost perversely compelling.
  19. An attempt at a beautiful film about renewal -- about past love, love lost, longing and rediscovery -- but it has no emotional truth.
  20. Reviewed by: Dennis Harvey
    20
    Juggles three separate time periods -- and is completely formulaic in each one.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 7 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 1 out of 4
  1. GrahamB.
    10
    I don't know what anyone is talking about, this film is one of the best I've seen recently.
  2. RichardC.
    8
    Perhaps not an artistic triumph, still, a charming film containing many lessons on life, especially how some people can learn to overcome disappointments, but also how others will carry their unrealistic dreams to the grave. Full Review »
  3. AnthonyY.
    3
    The visuals were ugly, the music often inappropriate and sentimental, the script predictable. How the director assembled such a strong cast for such a weak production is a mystery. Full Review »