User Score
4.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 28 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 28
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 28
  3. Negative: 15 out of 28
Watch On

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. CineCafeSitges
    Mar 4, 2008
    0
    An utter waste of time! The recent BBFC ban made me track this one down. It so desperately tries to shock but the "directors" non existent understanding of how to frame a shot, build tension, develop character or use music means that you are completely detached. I am sure child murder should spark some kind of audience reaction other than a yawn. Anyone can write some scenes that are An utter waste of time! The recent BBFC ban made me track this one down. It so desperately tries to shock but the "directors" non existent understanding of how to frame a shot, build tension, develop character or use music means that you are completely detached. I am sure child murder should spark some kind of audience reaction other than a yawn. Anyone can write some scenes that are meant to shock (all reasonable people have some kind of moral code) but it takes a real film maker (stand up Wes Craven, George Romero, John McNaughton, John Carpenter etc...) to make that audience gasp. MSP is a complete and utter waste of time. Avoid at all costs!!! Expand
  2. Someonewhocares
    Jan 8, 2005
    0
    Utterly repugnant.
  3. JohnnyW.
    Feb 2, 2007
    0
    It is laughable that the promoters have to stoop to the level of posting fake reviews on websites like this."elaine eddie charles steve harvey fred" you could have at least invented a person with piss poor grammar and punctuation (and maybe more than an initial for a last name) to make this joke of viral marketing more believable. As for the movie lets just say it is not "a must see" it It is laughable that the promoters have to stoop to the level of posting fake reviews on websites like this."elaine eddie charles steve harvey fred" you could have at least invented a person with piss poor grammar and punctuation (and maybe more than an initial for a last name) to make this joke of viral marketing more believable. As for the movie lets just say it is not "a must see" it is not "a masterpiece" and it is not even worth the three minutes I put into this post. Expand
  4. SalV
    Nov 16, 2005
    0
    Awful movie made by a talentless director. The lead performance by Sven Garrett is so bad it's laughable. There is hardly any gore in the film unless you count blood splattered on walls as "gore". Above all, the movie is boring . This may be one of the worst movie ever made. It should also be noted that all the people here giving the movie "great" reviews are part of the Awful movie made by a talentless director. The lead performance by Sven Garrett is so bad it's laughable. There is hardly any gore in the film unless you count blood splattered on walls as "gore". Above all, the movie is boring . This may be one of the worst movie ever made. It should also be noted that all the people here giving the movie "great" reviews are part of the director's street team. These reviews are not to be trusted. They have been doing this all over the internet. This goes to prove just how bad the film is as only employees of the director are praising the film. Don't waste your money on this director's crap. Expand
  5. Peter
    Jan 10, 2005
    0
    This film has no plot, no character development, nothing at all traditionally associated with a cinematic production. It is merely a stringing together of extremely bloody, gory, and pornographic scenes designed to repulse the audience in the most severe way possible. In the end, however, the film reveals the filmaker's sub-conscious anti-societal tendencies toward misogyny, This film has no plot, no character development, nothing at all traditionally associated with a cinematic production. It is merely a stringing together of extremely bloody, gory, and pornographic scenes designed to repulse the audience in the most severe way possible. In the end, however, the film reveals the filmaker's sub-conscious anti-societal tendencies toward misogyny, pedophilia, racism, and ultimately and pathetically, Aryan supremacy. The movie gives good reason for a narrow contruction of the First Amendment: it should never have been allowed to have been viewed by the public (i.e., it is as anti-societal as child pornography). Expand
  6. Ally
    Jan 19, 2005
    0
    This movie is DISGUSTING i got no satisfaction of any kind from watching this movie. The whole experience is something i would never relive. Don't go see it, you will be sick enough to vomit.
  7. TonyS
    Jun 14, 2009
    0
    If you want an idea of how bad this movie is: (1)The uncut version of this film graphically depicts the murder of a child. But you really couldn't give a hoot when watching it. Because its that bad. (2)Look at all the fake "reviews" on here from the "general public" calling it the best horror ever. Yeah right. (3)The opening credits of Irreversible (Just the bit where the names are If you want an idea of how bad this movie is: (1)The uncut version of this film graphically depicts the murder of a child. But you really couldn't give a hoot when watching it. Because its that bad. (2)Look at all the fake "reviews" on here from the "general public" calling it the best horror ever. Yeah right. (3)The opening credits of Irreversible (Just the bit where the names are listed before the film actually starts) is ten times more disturbing than this entire move. Expand
  8. Mar 12, 2014
    3
    Disgusting and vile. This exploitation like film is just a waste of cinema. A big waste. It's just not easy to watch, not the scenes, but the fact that it's more than 100 minutes of random killing and boring dialogue.
Metascore
13

Overwhelming dislike - based on 5 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 5
  3. Negative: 4 out of 5
  1. Be warned that the results are in aggressively awful taste from beginning to end.
  2. Reviewed by: Ned Martel
    0
    It is hard to know what exactly Mr. Palumbo is trying to say in his debased film.
  3. Reviewed by: Dennis Harvey
    10
    Pic's nastiness is so insistent, one-dimensional and excessive it risks self-parody.