Metascore
84 out of 100

Universal acclaim - based on 42 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 37 out of 42
  2. Negative: 1 out of 42
  1. 100
    Clint Eastwood pours everything he knows about directing into Mystic River. His film sneaks up, messes with your head and then floors you. You can't shake it. It's that haunting, that hypnotic.
  2. 100
    To see strong acting like this is exhilarating. In a time of flashy directors who slice and dice their films in a dizzy editing rhythm, it is important to remember that films can look and listen and attentively sympathize with their characters. Directors grow great by subtracting, not adding, and Eastwood does nothing for show, everything for effect.
  3. Mystic River is classic Eastwood, classic noir. If there is still some doubt about whether this one-time macho star is actually a world-class moviemaker, Mystic River should end the argument for good. One of the best American movies of the year, crisply well-crafted and beautifully acted.
  4. This kind of quiet ambiguity, avoiding easy answers to complex human conflicts, is all too rare in American movies.
  5. Reviewed by: Carla Meyer
    100
    Chilling, superbly acted.
  6. Reviewed by: Glenn Kenny
    100
    Perhaps the greatest, most affecting articulation of the theme Eastwood has been exploring since 1990's "White Hunter Black Heart": how violence--real violence, not movie violence--perpetrated and experienced, can erode and/or obliterate the human soul.
  7. Eastwood directs Mystic River with an invigorated grace and gravitas. This is a true American beauty of a movie, a tale of men and their bonds told by and for adults who value the old-fashioned Hollywood-studio notion of narrative.
  8. 100
    Eastwood has crafted one of the most powerful American dramas in years.
  9. Moves along its course and overflows at its climax with that indefinable but unmistakable assurance of a master filmmaker who knows just what he wants to say, is in total command of his medium and is in no mood to make any compromises.
  10. 100
    The performances are uniformly remarkable.
  11. 100
    A major American motion picture, an overpowering piece of work that involves some of the most basic human emotions: love, hate, fear, revenge, despair. Directed by Clint Eastwood with absolute confidence and remarkable control.
  12. 100
    Mystic River is the rare American movie that aspires to -- and achieves -- the full weight and darkness of tragedy.
  13. 100
    Eastwood's elegantly directed Mystic River, a deeply textured drama in which the sins (or perceived sins) of the past weigh heavily on the present.
  14. 100
    As close as we are likely to come on the screen to the spirit of Greek tragedy (and closer, I think, than Arthur Miller has come on the stage). The crime of child abuse becomes a curse that determines the pattern of events in the next generation. [13 October 2003, p. 112]
  15. 90
    Mystic River is hard-boiled beyond toughness: It's so tender the skin falls away from the bone. It's Eastwood's most soulful, and most organic, movie.
  16. Sean Penn is so frighteningly good in this movie that he outdoes even the best of his earlier work.
  17. 90
    In his best film since "Unforgiven," Eastwood ultimately lets observations on character, community, and the tidal patterns of tragedy shoulder a burden an ordinary murder mystery never could.
  18. Reviewed by: David Ansen
    90
    A haunted thriller of disturbing power.
  19. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    90
    This full-bodied adaptation of Dennis Lehane's involved and involving 2001 bestselling crime novel about old friends in Boston's working-class Irish neighborhood finds Clint Eastwood near the top of his directorial game with a cast of first-rate actors.
  20. 90
    If Mystic River is just a bit overplayed, a tad too highly pitched, it still resonates with grief and fury and feeling.
  21. 89
    Mystic River asks plenty of questions but rarely if ever offers any answers, and certainly no easy ones. If this fine and sorrowful film is what can be expected from our aging cinema icons, here’s to the golden years, dark though they may be.
  22. 88
    Deals with themes Eastwood has often explored before, but never so delicately or with as much sad wisdom: The way in which our past haunts our present, the lasting repercussions of violence and the cruel inexorability of fate.
  23. The white-knuckle center of the movie is Sean Penn, who gives an utterly raw performance as Jimmy, father of the dead girl. It's one of the few times that a parent's grief has felt real on the screen through all its ugly permutations.
  24. So incrementally does Eastwood's film build toward what seems like an inevitable resolution that when it concludes, you're sucker-punched. You haven't been watching a police procedural, but a Greek tragedy. You haven't been watching a drama about the catharsis of vigilantism, but sitting vigil for a community diminished, and permanently damaged, by violence.
  25. Reviewed by: Staff (Not Credited)
    88
    River ranks with the best movies Eastwood has directed: "The Outlaw Josey Wales," "Unforgiven" and "The Bridges of Madison County." But this time, the work is strong without his own on-screen presence -- a significant achievement.
  26. 88
    This is a powerful tale of crime, guilt, and punishment -- a drama that incorporates elements of whodunit mystery/thrillers and police procedurals with a richly textured three-character play.
  27. 80
    Echoes Eastwood’s previous exploration of true-life violence, “Unforgiven,” by tracing how death and depravity stain one’s life for generations, leaving seeds to take root in each branch of a tainted family tree.
  28. Reviewed by: Alan Morrison
    80
    Two things make Eastwood's task easier for him: a superb cast and a cracking source novel. Dennis Lehane's book is one of the very best thrillers of recent years, richer in Boston detail and closer in character study than anything Eastwood manages to bring to the screen.
  29. Reviewed by: David Edelstein
    80
    For all its missteps, Mystic River gets the big things right: It turns you inside out with grief, and it builds to an act of vigilante murder that is nearly impossible to endure.
  30. One of those rare recent films whose emotional power resonates long after you've left the theater.
  31. Reviewed by: Ty Burr
    75
    This is at bottom a pulp thriller that strains -- sometimes pretentiously, at other times with gutter magnificence -- to reach the level of basic human truths.
  32. The acting throughout is exceptional, rooted in observed realism, but suggestive of more mythical agents at work through the lives of human beings.
  33. The grandest presence here is Eastwood. His directing, like his acting, is minimal: unhurried, spare, unforced, rather somber.
  34. Arguably Eastwood's most ambitious film since his multi-Oscar winner, "Unforgiven." But it lacks the power and depth of that film's dynamic script by David Webb Peoples.
  35. 70
    If he were a more subtle director, it would be a great film; as it is, it's an extremely good one, anchored by the subtly devastating performances of Penn, Robbins and Bacon. The supporting cast is equally good, and blue collar Boston's mean streets take on a beaten-down life of their own.
  36. 70
    Where Lehane's novel seethes with emotionally charged subtext, Eastwood's workmanlike direction feels static -- fatally tasteful, embalmed in gravitas -- while his sporadic efforts at dramatic heightening come off as vulgar cliché.
  37. 70
    An urban crime thriller of considerable gravitas.
  38. Little more than the distended first half of a twisty, dark "Law & Order" script.
  39. 50
    Mystic River wants to be a Bruce Springsteen-like anthem of life and death in blue-collar America. It's no more than a doggerel rendition of poetic injustice.
  40. The performances, especially of Penn and Robbins, are so powerful and detailed (down to the Boston accents) that they often persuade one to overlook the narrative contrivances (particularly the incessant crosscutting), the arty trimmings (including Eastwood's own score), and the dubious social philosophy.
  41. If this death-obsessed drama is a classic, then give me potboiling life.
  42. Reviewed by: Phil Hall
    30
    The new bad movie from Clint Eastwood which takes Dennis Lehane's best-selling thriller and turns it into an inert mess that clocks in at 137 minutes but feels like 137 hours.
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 279 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 85 out of 143
  2. Negative: 35 out of 143
  1. 10
    People are idiots, SImple as that. Mystic River is a great film - Great acting by the cast, Interesting story, and a very satisfying ending. Sean Penn and Tim Robbins are untouchable in this. Full Review »
  2. AlexR
    4
    wow, I can find some seemingly good aspects about this film if I try, but come on!.. a 10? Award nominations? I just can’t understand it. It’s a decent movie in its genre. It’s got some good (though pretentious) photography. It’s got those classic Hollywood drama technicalities decently (or even well) performed. It’s got pretty good, if not a bit overacted, performances. And it’s got some dark narrative that succeeds in its tough impact, even when such accomplishment uses pretty manipulative, maybe even pathetic, techniques. I will concede all these positive aspects about it with its, I find, pretty logical counterparts; but I wonder how can anyone overlook all this movie’s manipulative inconsistencies, its huge plot holes that don’t quite serve the movie to become great even in its own genre, or, most importantly, its too little sense or meaning! [***SPOILERS***] It is supposed to be about three characters affected by a single event in their lives, the rape of one of them. Sure, the actual molested kid was greatly affected, but we didn’t see enough of him to understand or even feel like the audience of such effect. About the effect in Penn’s character, I can find a thousand better reasons for him to become what he became other than having a friend raped. And Bacon's character? Please, don’t just cram in a neglected wife just to show he was somehow affected too. So what the heck is this movie about? a crime? You don’t really see anything that is really related to the actual execution of the crime until the scriptwriters finally decided they should tell you which unrelated character did it. What else now? The loss of a child and the effect of such a tragedy? That basically adds to 30 minutes of this long movie to be reason enough for the more than two hours it lasts. The link between these three characters? The movie never plunges deep enough on their relationship or on how exactly the relationship had been scarred by that event (or by any other in their lifetimes), to justify the movie’s existence on such basis. I can accept that maybe they succeeded only a little bit more with the torn and conflicted relationship between Penn and Robbins by the end of the movie, but you barely get to grasp it and it is there in a way that seems to have been manipulatively tossed in to increase the drama). So what else can it be about? the shock factor that the manipulations in the movie can bring? Well I guess that’s the most probable excuse for this movie; and at that it does succeed. But I just don’t see how such a frivolous triumph can be awarded with excellent reviews or even any nomination to script, director, or movie. (I don’t get the nomination for actor either, given that his performance in 21 grams was much better and much more credible than his melodramatic one here. How can people who criticize the more sober yet intentionally and pragmatically self-absorbed The Hours for being too melodramatic, praise this performance or this movie as a whole, just doesn’t make sense to me). In general, this is a decent dark mystery drama with the potential of bringing a rather disquieting effect to the viewer (so don’t expect it to be an enjoyable ride); but it simply lacks sense in almost every possible way. However, if you like to suffer for no logical reason, see this movie. If you like the mystery drama genre, you might enjoy it also. Well… as incomprehensible it might be for me, you might still like it given that so many people do, so you might as well give it a try. As for me, after much thought I can only keep disliking it and just try to stop resenting it for the acclaim it did get. Full Review »
  3. 10
    Absolutely fantastic! I don't understand why people find it bad! I don't often trust the 'Oscar winner' type of movies, but this movie deserved the award! The actors were all formidable! you couldn't ask for a better cast, because this film has a deluxe- cast! I think some people are usually biased thinking that a big Hollywood movie, is either 'bad' or 'overrated' and, quite frankly, that type of attitude doesn't help a person to appreciate a movie for what it is. I am sorry but I disagree...Hollywood has good and bad movies, same happens in Europe, Latin America, Asia, Africa, and my dear Australia! so just because this is a USA blockbuster it doesn't mean is a bad movie...and I am not American, but YEAH, I firmly believe this is an excellent movie! Full Review »