- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Oct 8, 2003
User Score
6.3
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 334 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 213 out of 334
-
Mixed: 32 out of 334
-
Negative: 89 out of 334
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
EdwardL.Nov 7, 20039Mystic River will receive a minimum of 5 Academy Award nominations. Clint Eastwood will win the Oscar!
-
-
BrianG.Oct 18, 20036
-
-
DanO.Oct 21, 20036
-
-
BenA.Dec 1, 20039Mystic River never let me down. I heard great things, and they were all true. I was not disappointed by any aspect of the story. I'm glad they spent the extra money to shoot it in Boston instead of Toronto. I really liked the neighborhood they shot it in, it gave it such a human feel to it.
-
-
BenA.Dec 1, 20039Mystic River never let me down. I heard great things, and they were all true. I was not disappointed by any aspect of the story. I'm glad they spent the extra money to shoot it in Boston instead of Toronto. I really liked the neighborhood they shot it in, it gave it such a human feel to it.
-
-
TerryD.Dec 15, 200310
-
-
RachelH.Dec 18, 20039I can't imagine how a suspenseful engrossing film such as this one could be boring. The acting drew me in. And I love seeing Boston on screen.
-
-
ScottE.Dec 19, 20039
-
-
AlexDec 19, 20032There are worse films this year, but none more infuriating and overplayed. The story deteriorates into dreadfulness in the last half hour and suddenly explodes into a series of pathetically delivered monologues and Christ-like poses. Easily the most overrated film of the year; how it has managed to rack in such applause is shocking.
-
-
BethOct 23, 20032It's not the subject of the film that is so much tragic as the film itself. In one Razzie-worthy example, Laura Linney's monologue in the end was so hilariously bad, I laughed out loud in the theater, much to the anger of the others around me. I couldn't help it - few films have ever felt so calculated, so false, so unbelievably awful.
-
-
MooCowMooDec 30, 20038
-
-
PeytonW.Dec 6, 20038An excellent movie, that only receives an 8 because of its unfortunately long ending, and some scenes that are repetitive or go on too long. Overall, fine acting and a good movie though.
-
-
JJNov 18, 20044Good acting by Sean Penn and Tim Robbins. Everything else sucks. The storyline leaves too many loose ends. K. Bacon seemed too weak and what contribution did the subplot of the wife calling him on the cell phone add to the movie. This movie certainly doesn't deserve all the kudos it gets.
-
-
GarthB.Jan 24, 20042
-
-
KarlS.Feb 12, 20042Overwrought, overwritten, overacted, overdirected. It's also pretentious and constantly blaring its inflated sense of importance to the viewer. In the end its pomposity just translates into random speeches and non sequiturs. The plot is one of the most predictable of the year, and yet also manages to have more holes than Swiss cheese. I left the theater with a headache.
-
-
MaL.Feb 13, 200410Pure genius. And the greatest acting in one film in the past decade!
-
-
MariahJ.Feb 13, 20044Tim Robbins turns in a good performance and Sean Penn falls overboard his hamming boat. The book was far better than this patchy, lifeless, self-important adaptation.
-
-
JonFeb 15, 20044A depressing, disappointing mystery flick. It tries to be important by exploiting social issues such as child abuse, but the overacting made me cringe, and the inflated script (which was lifted striaght out of the book, and badly botched during the attempt) is simply overbearing.
-
-
DeloresH.Feb 15, 200410If there is any justice, this film should win Best Picture come Oscars. It wasn't the best film of the year, but it's the best from the nominated bunch. A lot better than that hyped up franchise with 11 nominations.
-
-
GeorgeJ.Feb 17, 20043Sean Penn scrunches up his face a lot. Female roles are one-dimensional and exist for nothing else than to prop others up. To see real acting, go see Lost in Translation.
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 22, 20041
-
-
EmineeeT.Feb 29, 20041I expected a lot from this movie...and was very disappointed. The actors are first rate, but played horrible, emotion-less characters in this movie. The story line left large holes that were never answered. The movie lacked feeling, appeal, and flow. I do not recommend it. Sean Penn should not have won best actor...perhaps Bill Murray???
-
-
RyanK.Mar 16, 200410
-
-
MichaelApr 13, 20043Laura Linney's closing monologue should be nominated somewhere for the worst monologue ever delivered. So atrocious I laughed out loud in the theater!!!
-
-
YoonMinC.May 25, 20048Eastwood goes strangely mystic in the milieu of working class america. yet, noir was always a kind of pulpy peering into the irrational abyss, beyond the border where rules of conventionality broke down and an occultish set of rules took over. we feel as though drained of usual moral categories and expectations and infused with something alien.
-
-
GregT.Jun 18, 20048This movie was interesting and well acted. I figured out who the killer was half way through the movie but it was interesting nonetheless. I like Sean Penn, Tim Robbins and Kevin Bacon. They are all diligent actors.
-
-
PauletteT.Jun 27, 20049
-
-
DavidC.Jul 11, 20049I see why this movie has a user average of 5, but the bad ending is greatly overshadowed by the powerful performances of this movie. I loved it! It does leave you with many questions, but it's no reason to give it a low mark.
-
-
PepperJ.Jul 18, 20049One of the best movies I have ever seen. Great acting. Great story. Just great.
-
-
LSAug 21, 20043The acting was alright at times, but this movie was HORRIBLE! The script was cliched and the movie tried to be deep and thematic with the whole "river" theme, when the river was barely shown or mentioned at all!
-
-
TonyB.Oct 26, 200510
-
-
JackTJan 16, 200710I found this film to be one of the most spiritually profound works to come out of the Hollywood studio system in quite some time. Eastwood sorts through the rubble of his characters' lives with an assurance and patience that's reminiscent of his better works. The film has its ciphers (namely Laura Linney's Lady Macbeth) and its fair share of summarizing speeches
-
-
StevenZ.Sep 25, 20070
-
-
AMovieCriticOct 26, 20096
-
-
S.FinnDec 12, 20038Well made, great acting and a worthy topic.
-
-
JoshB.Dec 22, 20039
-
-
Nov 24, 201110I have watched this film countless times and I still love it. It has a great story, great acting, and its just an overall great film that I love. This is a must see.
-
Oct 29, 20108
-
Dec 30, 201010This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Nov 15, 201110A mesmerizing experience as MR keeps you glued to your seat with a stimulating adventure, ideal character development, and epic performances. MUST WATCH!
-
Mar 4, 20112It was on TV recently and talk about not able to hold my attention. I popped in now and then to see if I could stand it as there was nothing else on. Bad.
-
Apr 5, 201210
-
Jan 1, 20138Absolutely loved this movie. Well acted, Kept you interested from start to finish, and it was really good. I am suprised that users have rated it so low.
-
Apr 1, 201210First off, this is a 9.5 out of 10. Acting is amazing. Mainly Sean Penn and Tim Robbins. Score is good. Story is great. Real thrilling story. I agree a lot with what spadenx, except the ending. It's all right but he kills an innocent man and they just like " oh well". That makes me aggravated. Still a great movie. Overall, this is a great thriller. It'll keep you on guessing. Highly recommended.
-
Oct 1, 201210Sean Penn, Tim Robbins and Kevin Bacon, great actors .
-
Jun 10, 201210Great movie .
-
Jun 25, 201210My favorite movie .
-
Jun 25, 201210Best movie ever .
-
Nov 13, 201210One of the most powerful American films of the decade, Mystic River is hypnotic and unforgettable.
-
Nov 13, 20129Friggin' yes! A mid-tempo and ominous thrill ride, overcast from beginning to end by a shadow of dark things to come. Also, one of the best acting ensembles I've seen. Clint Eastwood is the man, and Mystic River is just another sparkling example.
-
75This is at bottom a pulp thriller that strains -- sometimes pretentiously, at other times with gutter magnificence -- to reach the level of basic human truths.
-
100To see strong acting like this is exhilarating. In a time of flashy directors who slice and dice their films in a dizzy editing rhythm, it is important to remember that films can look and listen and attentively sympathize with their characters. Directors grow great by subtracting, not adding, and Eastwood does nothing for show, everything for effect.
-
100Mystic River is classic Eastwood, classic noir. If there is still some doubt about whether this one-time macho star is actually a world-class moviemaker, Mystic River should end the argument for good. One of the best American movies of the year, crisply well-crafted and beautifully acted.