- Studio: Fox Searchlight Pictures
- Release Date: Sep 15, 2010
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100This is a good movie, from a masterful novel.
-
100Poignant, troubling and altogether splendid new film.
-
90The drama boasts a stellar cast, exquisite performances and a tense atmosphere. It is a film that the author's fans and lovers of mature, measured storytelling will embrace.
-
90Never Let Me Go is that rare find, a fragile little four-leaf clover of a movie that's emotionally devastating, yet all too easily trampled by cynics.
-
88A beautifully mopey adaptation of Kazuo Ishiguro's much-praised novel.
-
88The melancholy attached to the impermanence of life and love suffuses this film, making it memorably haunting and hypnotic.
-
88Anyone who saw the Oscar-nominated Mulligan in "An Education" knows what she can do. If you didn't, you're in for the kind of quietly revelatory acting that portends a brilliant career.
-
88May be too sterile and stylized to elicit real tears, but it's got brains and heart to spare.
-
83Best approached with little to no advance information or expectations, which is the same way the film's characters experience their lives.
-
Feb 7, 201180A beautifully realised adaptation of a profoundly affecting novel. Intelligent sci-fi provides the backdrop, while in the foreground is a trio of truly impressive performances from Mulligan, Knightley and Garfield.
-
80Despite its fanciful premise, Never Let Me Go looks and feels utterly real.
-
80Director Mark Romanek captures the slightly seedy and rundown reality of '70s and '80s British life in astonishing and even tragic detail; this is more like a period piece than a science-fiction movie.
-
80The surface blandness does not efface, and might even amplify, its disturbing qualities. Never Let Me Go is not a movie about death but, more painfully, about the consciousness of death.
-
80This is a moving and provocative film that initially unsettles, then disturbs and finally haunts you well into the night.
-
75The film is a success. It works. Greatness eludes it, yes. But greatness eludes almost every film adaptation of a major novel, which we must remember when confronted by a good one.
-
75The film is sad in a beautiful, peaceful manner, and its exploration of mortality is different from most others, since the three central protagonists are all barely in their 30s.
-
75Never Let Me Go is gorgeous. And depressing. It's exquisitely acted. And depressing. It's romantic, profound and superbly crafted, shot with the self-contained radiance of a snow globe. And it's depressing.
-
75What we see is admirable, but what we feel is minimal.
-
75Never Let Me Go isn't the kind of movie you talk about on the drive home -- it's even better. It's the kind that makes you sit quietly and think, rolling it around in your head and considering the angles.
-
75Strangely moving and mournful, but I wish more had been made of the beauty these people are relinquishing, if only as a counterweight to all that artful drear.
-
70A film more moving than most but not as devastating as it should be.
-
67The subdued characters I can abide, intellectually speaking, but subdued filmmaking with material this fundamentally gut-punching is a lot less easy to swallow.
-
67The world depicted in Mark Romanek's Never Let Me Go is among the more beautiful dystopias in film history.
-
65Knightley has the least screen time of the three, and her Ruth never registers as much more than a self-serving menace.
-
63Epitomizes the kind of somber, aesthetically refined and morally engaged film that commands deep respect without inspiring much affection.
-
63Amazingly, Never Let Me Go could have been assembled from the Merchant-Ivory kit. It's stale with suppressed anguish.
-
63It is an accepted truth that adapting a sublime novel does not always result in a sublime movie. To an extent, this is the problem with Never Let Me Go.
-
60Expertly acted, impeccably photographed, intelligently written, even intermittently touching, the film is also too parched and ponderous to connect with a large audience.
-
60For its delicate tone, provocative themes, impeccable craftsmanship and superb performances-by Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield and Keira Knightley-Never Let Me Go earned my great admiration. I wish I'd been affected in equal measure, but I wasn't, and it's not the sort of film you can will yourself to enjoy.
-
It's a very tony fantasy of class oppression and fascist medical exploitation (themes that may speak louder in England), but it's a lyrically inert movie.
-
50Science fiction movies don't come much more ponderous than the beautifully filmed Never Let Me Go, which reduces the debate over genetic engineering to a mild, moist romantic soap opera.
-
50Just as its characters need a reason to live, Go needs a reason for audiences to watch. Neither find much satisfaction.
-
50Imagine a stuffy Merchant Ivory production blended with muted Michael Crichton sci-fi and you have Never Let Me Go, at least as it plays on screen.
-
50Alas, what's missing is the spark of life, the jolt of the unexpected - something beyond tears - to puncture the falseness of a film world, which, by its insistence on its own beauty, obscures the tragedy that the three characters, by their nature, cannot express.
-
50You don't have to get too far into Kazuo Ishiguro's brilliant 2005 novel Never Let Me Go to realize it's hopelessly unfilmable.
-
40The stylistic conceit of keeping us entirely with the clones (so that we are as ill-informed as they are and never get to meet their powerful oppressors) only reveals what an empty-headed abstraction this tale was from both page and frame one
-
40Never Let Me Go is in such good taste that we never feel any horror over the idea at the center of it.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 21 out of 35
-
Mixed: 3 out of 35
-
Negative: 11 out of 35
-
9
-
2This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.
-
2This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.