- Studio: Strand Releasing
- Release Date: Sep 5, 2003
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
38In the end you don't believe what you're watching, and you don't care. This party is a drag.
-
38Devotes most of its energy to its costumes and makeup, which are fabulous. But that and a tabloid-worthy star just aren't enough to revisit this sordid tale as a kind of twisted comedy.
-
30The film's only real bright spot is Seth Green, who, as Culkin's sidekick, brings Party Monster a droll wit it otherwise lacks. It's such a dreary mess that when Culkin insists that life in prison isn't too different from being a club kid, it's all too easy to believe him.
-
30The psychologizing in Party Monster never goes deeper than what you might get out of Dr. Phil on a bad day.
-
25Feels fake, forced and indigestible.
-
25Macaulay Culkin still can't act, and it's no longer cute. His performance in Party Monster is so embarrassing one doesn't know where to look.
-
25"Prison isn't all that different from a nightclub,'' comments Alig toward the end. Funny; this movie isn't all that different from prison.
-
20A colorful mess, all style and substances and little else.
-
20There's really only one reason to see Party Monster, and that's Seth Green's scene-stealing performance as former (and somewhat reluctant) New York club kid James St. James, the boy who would be queen.
-
The distance between tawdry and tedious can be amazingly short. It is traveled with Concorde speed in the arch Party Monster.
-
20The wanton fabulistas of Party Monster are as boring and insignificant as the very "normals and drearies" they so contemptuously deride.
-
10Unwatchable.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 14 out of 19
-
Mixed: 0 out of 19
-
Negative: 5 out of 19
-
0
-
JenyL.10I just loved this movie! It had the perfect cast.. the only word I can think of to say is that it was FABULOUS!!!