- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: May 12, 2006
User Score
6.0
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 93 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 54 out of 93
-
Mixed: 10 out of 93
-
Negative: 29 out of 93
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
chelseaJan 31, 200910This movie was soo intense! some parts made me cry. but i couldn't find anything wrong with it. and plus josh lucas is sexy which is good enough for me !
-
-
VinodS.May 16, 200610superb movie!!!!!!!!!! i loooove the movie so much... full of adventure, suspense, n thrilled wid the special effects... wow rely mind blowing.. for those who lik adv superb effects n nail biting scenes i recommend tis movie.
-
-
DazJun 20, 20069I really don't know why this film is getting such bad reviews. Both my wife and i thought it was ace. The effects and edge of the seat moments were worth the entry money alone. A great movie and i think it is even better than the (great) original.
-
-
AngOct 5, 200610I loved the movie, even started looking online to see if this was made from an actual event and I ended up here instead. [***SPOILERS***] I cried when the dad died. So I'm glad I rented it to see at home instead of the movies. I give the singer a 0 cause she is just nasty.
-
-
ChrisC.May 10, 20060Painful...makes four hours of "Titanic" feel like a 30-minute sitcom.
-
-
MichelleC.May 10, 20068This movie is what it is, a disaster flick. It is exciting and will be entertaining to anyone who simply enjoys a good adventure movie for being just that. That said, I did, however, wish for a longer intro and more character development. The trailer was barely over before disaster struck.
-
-
AldrinC.May 16, 20063"Poseidon" is typical of Wolfgang Petersen's films; either they suck or they sink.
-
-
ZeusA.May 18, 200610
-
-
EdQ.May 30, 20066
-
-
AlveroO.May 30, 20061terrible movie it was a wasted of time this movie should have been called Titanic 2 but it is just a poor imitation (I know it is based on a 1972 movie) but it has no any plot so you are not worried about the moment when the people die because yo have not been involved with the characters.
-
-
PaulK.May 8, 20066Slightly above average popcorn flick. The special effects are top notch and the suspense is at full throttle, but there should have been more character development. I had no invested interest in whether these people lived or died, apart from Jimmy Bennett's character. His role was an annoying plot device identical to what he played in Firewall. Cliche, anyone?
-
-
KenG.Jun 17, 20063What script? What character development? Action wasn't even handled that well, because it all blurs together.
-
-
magnusJun 4, 20061
-
-
MarcO.Jun 7, 20062I prefered the 1972 movie that they extracted it from. This was just nonsense.
-
-
JohnB.Sep 19, 20066
-
-
StephanieG.May 21, 200710
-
-
BethanSJul 30, 200710
-
-
MikeS.May 11, 20069Great movie... a little short on plot, but the action is phenomenal. Josh Lucas is great also.
-
-
StanleyBMay 14, 20061I was shocked and disgusted by the treatment of ethnic minorities in this movie. It was offensive and insulting. Just kill off all the minorites. What a pitiful execuse of a movie. Get me my ten dollars back.
-
-
NealC.May 14, 20063
-
-
thaliar.May 15, 20061
-
-
TedT.May 15, 20062I didn't go expecting much. I got even less. Missing is any depth of character, no undercurrent themes that were prevelant in the 1972 version, no story,and no point. A terrible movie that made about 20 million too much in its first weekend.
-
-
MarkB.May 16, 20061
-
-
MaseMay 18, 20065Quick and painless summer fare, plain old fashion disaster filck. If you are looking for anything else with say depth. Go elsewhere. Visuals are fantastic, characters are merely there to get thrown around by water nothing else.
-
-
LynseyC.May 21, 20068I was pleasantly surprised at this movie, especially with the lower rating. Yes, there was some predictibility, but this was pretty decent for an action flick.
-
-
TomH.May 21, 20068Petersen turns up the action and turns down the melodrama on the 1972 incarnation of Gallico's novel. Gone are the sermons, the soul-searching and the theme song; the characters don't have time to ponder whether there's going to be a morning after (or whether they
-
-
ChristineP.Jun 1, 20062i almost fall alsleep and the movies doesnt even have a story line. it was bored and it failed to make me feel touching. and actors were acting not really good at this movie either. it was aweful.
-
-
StuartM.Jul 21, 200610I loved it! I cant understand why people found it terrible, their stupid! It was Fantastic.
-
-
DaveB.Aug 22, 20060one of the worst films of all time...terrible in every aspect possible...bad acting...unrealistic and dull plot...bad writing....annoying direction...its so bad it even goes down to bad lighting, special effects and hot women.
-
-
[Anonymous]Aug 22, 20060A horrible movie in every way.
-
-
CameronS.Sep 11, 20069Very good movie.
-
-
PeterJ.Jan 27, 20075The beginning of the movie was great, but the rest of it was predictably boring at best. I actually left the room a few times without pausing it. I was expecting a better story line. You knew exactly what was going to happen.
-
-
BradB.Jul 7, 20087Petersen gets a lot out of his actors, atleast it felt like they all could be close to death at any time. For some reason, and maybe because of the disaster film label that started with the first one in'72, I think the movie got a bit of a bad rap. I noticed that Dreyfus had nothing to do with the special feature interviews. Better than the original, and without the campy dialogue.
-
-
JessicaW.Nov 7, 200610
-
-
RoboB.Oct 17, 20060Absolutely terrible. A degrading role for Richard Dreyfus.... I'd rather sit through a New Years morning hangover listening to someone drag their fingernails across a chalkboard than sit through this abortion of a film again.
-
-
AlexC.Dec 25, 20067
-
-
GuillermoP.May 12, 20068Poseidon was a good movie, i recommend it to others out there. The movie is very interesting and keeps you on your toes and wondering what's going to happen next.
-
-
JustinH.May 12, 20068Unbelievably intense.
-
-
KeithD.May 13, 200610A great film , Then and now. And a great new story for todays viewers. A short intro leads to non-stop action and suspense. Irwin Allen would be proud and gratious to all involved. Keith M. Donkersley Alb. N. M
-
-
ChristopherW.May 14, 20067Yes, the movie is short on plot and the characters are pretty thin, but I found the film to be a well acted, terse, exciting, and visually visceral film. The extended scene in which the ship actually overturns is extraordinarily well done and quite awe inspiring. Also, who couldn't resist Josh Lucas and those ol' baby blues!
-
-
SusanM.May 15, 20069I went in not expecting much and came out really happy! I thought this was an excellent film and would highly recommend it to anyone. Lots of action and adventure!!
-
-
SteveMay 15, 200610This was one of the best movies i have ever seen truly well done.
-
-
JamesJMay 15, 20060People may have liked this junk 35 years ago, but then again, Bread was a popular band once. The original wasn't any good, why did I think a bloated remake would be better? Don't waste your money - boycott this or else Hollywood's going to make more (and we don't need a remake of "Earthquake.")
-
-
SelinaL.May 15, 20068It was an entertaining movie! Those who didn't get entertained (looking for character depth, blah blah) were watching the wrong MOVIE! You don't watch "American Beauty" and expect action and suspense, so don't watch "Poiseidon" looking for character depth and the blah blah. It was fun to WATCH, it was ENTERTAINING and I liked it!
-
-
WillM.May 18, 200610
-
-
BillyS.May 27, 20061
-
-
Apr 15, 201110Let's be honest this was not the best movie made at the time of its release, but it was enjoyable not doubt, I cant really praise the acting of the actors except for the little kid who did really a good job at such young age and the Spanish woman who i think acted AMAZING and brought tension to the movie, i love this no doubt
-
May 3, 20125
-
Feb 24, 20138Every bit as dramatic and action packed as the original. All it's lacking is the character development the original had, which is more than made up for by the special effects. Very entertaining edge of your seat movie, every bit as good as the original.
-
Sep 2, 20125A pretty pathetic movie with cliches over all the place. the acting was below average as well as the writing but at least the action and visuals were good.
-
Sep 2, 20127The movie was actually pretty exciting and a different kind of destruction movie. The visuals were great, and the adventure to safety kept me attentive. Suspenseful and thrilling.
-
Jun 4, 20133The movie was not that good.
-
Jun 13, 20136I really enjoyed this movie. I cannot understand all the negative comments associated with it at all. If you go and watch a movie called Poseidon you should expect to see a big ship go belly up and then a fight for survival and that is exactly what we get.
-
75You'll end up entertained if you forgive the cliches and let Petersen grab you with the visuals.
-
70Among the willing cast, only Jacinda Barrett and topliners Josh Lucas, Kurt Russell and Richard Dreyfuss manage, just barely, to suggest a third dimension to the script's cursory character sketches. But that won't matter to audiences craving a disaster thrill ride.
-
70Thanks to its simple construction, Wolfgang Petersen's large-scale liner moves reasonably well, though anyone with the faintest memory of its 1972 predecessor will wonder where most of the plot went.