User Score
7.1 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 33 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 33
  2. Negative: 3 out of 33

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. DanaM.
    Oct 8, 2005
    7
    Entertaining film. Worth seeng but does not deserve a 10 rating. No film deserves a ten rating or a zero at that. A tad depressing and frustrating but madness will do that to folks. Timeline at times a little confusing but overall well acted and directed.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. HeatherW
    Dec 6, 2005
    5
    This is one of those movies that makes me wish I'd waited for DVD. It wasn't "bad," but it wasn't "good" either. It was safe and tepid and predictable. Competent and not-bad acting, but nothing exciting or relevatory. I think I've decided that Paltrow really isn't that great an actor, although she's neither bad nor annoying. But that's hardly glowing praise. Anyway. Not an exceptional movie. Perhaps the play was better. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. PennyE.
    Sep 18, 2005
    10
    I thought it was a most intelligent film and Paltrow was brilliantly directed by Madden.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. AdamH.
    Sep 27, 2005
    6
    Paltrow is good, Hope Davis is outstanding, but the movie is fairly mediocre. I would have preferred less of Hopkins as the father (who seemed too well-groomed for a mad genius) and more of the very believable sister dynamic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. RichardS
    Oct 2, 2005
    9
    Absolutely one of the best movies of the year, and a tremendous performance by Paltrow. I was astounded at how well the play translated onto the screen with minimal changes, but without feeing stagy. Hopkins was also very good at what portraying someone with an undetermined madness (probably *not* schizophrenia); his physical presence gave the performance just the right touch. The only "complaint" my wife gave was that you came away not hating Hope Davis's character quite enough. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. FrankS.
    Oct 23, 2005
    9
    I thought Gwyneth did a sensational job of showng the fringe between genius and sanity.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. SusanM.
    Oct 28, 2005
    10
    This is one of the nest movies I have seen in such a long time. Gwyneth is once again AMAZING! And Anthony Hopkins is brilliant as well. A really impressive conversion of stage show to movie. I was so engrossed in the story that I didn't want it to end. John Madden is a very talented director.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. JacobB.
    Sep 17, 2005
    10
    Simply fantastic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. ChrisK.
    Sep 25, 2005
    6
    Paltrow as a math hidden math genius? Come on. Also, some of the scenes require a suspension of belief that is just unbelivable. Prefer a few others.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. LuntS.
    Sep 25, 2005
    1
    The people who made this movie have clearly not done a math problem in their entire lives. Terrible.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  11. MikeB.
    Sep 8, 2005
    10
    Best film of the year! Gwyneth's performance deserves an oscar.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. Jen
    Mar 31, 2006
    7
    Generally well acted and directed, but kind of dull. Paltrow's a little over the top in parts and not terribly believable as a math genius.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. TonyB.
    Apr 5, 2006
    7
    This is a very intelligently written film that will unfortunately appeal mainly to a specific and rather small audience. It is well acted by Anthony Hopkins and by Jake Gylenhall, who is not miscast as some of the critics insist. The real acting honors, however, go to Gynneth Paltrow and Hope Davis, who, especially when they are in the same scenes, are just about perfect.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. JeffM.
    Jul 27, 2006
    6
    The movie, while well acted, suffers from an insurmountable problem: Gwyneth Paltrow's character is unbelievably annoying. I could not buy that Gyllenhaal was that interested in her, since I really looked forward to scenes without her in it, which are few and far between.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. 2Roads
    Jun 3, 2007
    8
    A must see story for those living in the metaphorical house of quandary while caretaking a loved one. "How many days have I lost? … I wonder if I will ever find my way out." The story gives substance to the inner conflict, loss of self and a proof that there is hope in the end.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. EllenS.
    Sep 23, 2005
    7
    I really enjoyed this film. Gwyneth Paltrow -- for once not made up to be the perfect American blonde beauty -- gives a great performance as the sad but ultimately determined heroine. Jake Gyllenhaal is very entertaining as an incredibly good looking math geek (that could happen, right?) and Hope Davis was so convincing as the ambitious, ultra organized and controlling big sister that I nearly reached through the screen to punch her out. It was an interesting and often surprisng story, well worth a trip to the theater but it will play well in the home theater down the line. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. [Anonymous]
    Sep 25, 2005
    10
    Gorgeous.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. JennyE.
    Feb 16, 2006
    9
    I enjoyed this film more than most films I watch. Paltrow and Davis shine in a very real sister relationship. There is enough mystery to keep you interested, and emotionally involved right to the end. The ending, while not totally satisfying, was realistic. I didn't want the story to end. Very well done by all invoved !
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. SharonB.
    Jun 18, 2006
    8
    Great job by Gwyneth Paltrow. Would like to know more about this complicated family.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. May 29, 2011
    6
    Great actors in a movie out of standard due to its excellent script, where Mathematics is the relation that binds the peculiar characters of the plot. Although I am suspect to say because Mathematics is my least exact science! I recommend it though! The main three characters did a spectacular job with the script which has been given to them. "The future of cold is infinite. The future of heat is the future of cold". Expand
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 37 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 37
  2. Negative: 0 out of 37
  1. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    90
    Proof is on the side of the lost, blessed souls. Paltrow, as alluring and reassuring as ever, emphasizes the blessedness in the isolation of genius, giving a new dimension to a complex role. New, true and thrilling--she is the Catherine that Proof was waiting for.
  2. Reviewed by: David Rooney
    80
    But despite less-than-ideal casting of the male roles, and a tendency to soften the Pulitzer Prize-winning work's thorny humor with a more sober tone, director John Madden has woven together an elegant, intelligent drama of a breed increasingly rare in mainstream American movies.
  3. 50
    Madden directed Paltrow in the play on the London stage, but he does his "Shakespeare in Love" goddess no favors by filling the screen with big close-ups that betray the theatrical origins of the piece and drain the movie of life and urgency. Proof hasn't been filmed at all -- it's been embalmed.