User Score
7.4 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 171 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 35 out of 171

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. johnf.
    Nov 29, 2005
    9
    Memories of a world that doesn't exist anymore... much to my deep regret.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. JGarrett
    Nov 29, 2005
    7
    I started to fall asleep during the first hour, then forced myself to stay awake for the remainder counting the number of other people falling asleep in the theatre. The play is better storyline wise, but this movie has fantasic singing and harmonies. Thumbs up for Jessie, Rosario, Traciee, Adam.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  3. abird
    May 9, 2006
    8
    Throughly enjoyable. For someone who hasn't seen the play, the movie is refreshing. Watch it without being too judgemental about the socio-political implications, it is smart & sexy. It is abvious that this movie will polarise people's opinion beacuse of the subject .
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. stane.
    Jan 2, 2006
    9
    Loved the acting and the great music. Did not see the play.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. DaveD.
    Jan 6, 2006
    10
    Equal to the play in every possible way. Everyone should see this. Chris Columbus translated the mood and songs from the stage to film wonderfully. I would give this a 20 out of 10, but I don't have that option. I found my soul at Rent.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. SteveF.
    Nov 25, 2005
    9
    This very passionate Rent bubbles with life-affirmation, underclass anger and grittiness, and orgiastic choruses. It depicts one year in the lives of a group of friends in the Lower East Side during the sad age of AIDS before the drug cocktails. The music generally works but is forgettable, with the exception of three songs. Also, the story becomes threadbare and meanders at times, especially during the movie's last act. However, Chris Columbus has directed the movie well and maintains a fluid, raw and compelling stream of action and music. The actors are all good, especially Idina Menzel, Traci Thoms, Rosario Dawson, and Adam Pascal who all blow you away with their performing/singing. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. BILLB
    Nov 26, 2005
    9
    I saw the original Broadway cast a couple of times and the smartest thing Chris Columbus did was to cast most of the originals in their roles. There are some pretty heavy themes (addiction, AIDS, homelessness, transgender etc..) and yet it all ends up feeling very hopeful and loving in the end. I never felt sorry for any of the characters.....they all seem to be trying to find their own happiness. Rosario Dawson did a superb job filling the unifillable shoes of Daphne Rubin Vega as Mimi. As others have said, if you have an open mind or were a fan of the stage version of the show, you will enjoy the movie but if you have problems with the "muscial" format, this movie will be hard to watch. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. kyle
    Dec 3, 2005
    0
    Sucked plain and simple.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. IreneG.
    Jan 6, 2006
    10
    Totally awesome movie. I wouldn't mind seeing it 100 more time...except that it's not in theaters anymore!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. ChadS.
    Feb 3, 2006
    6
    The truth about "Rent" is that all the memorable songs are front-loaded, ending with the rousing "La Vie Boheme". Up to this point, the Tony Award-winning Jonathan Larson musical offers up a pretty good time for "Rent"-neophytes. "One Song Glory" should've confined Roger(Adam Pascal) to the apartment, but the song is still gloriously corny, and moving; the two same adjectives that can also be applied to "Seasons of Love". Stripped of its signature guitar riff from the Broadway version, "Out Tonight" no longer bears a passing resemblance to Sinnead O'Connor's "Mandinka", and Rosario Dawson convinces us that she probably won over her castmates. But after we leave the restaurant, apart from the duet between Maureen(Idina Menzel) and Joanne(Tracie Thoms), "Rent" is for die-hards only. It does "fun" better than "maudlin". You can't really blame the filmmaker because it's all about the songs. "Rent" needed one more song, a death song along the lines of "I Dreamed a Dream" from "Les Miserables". What Roger writes for Mimi is pretty weak. In "What You Own", Roger is walking in the desert like he's Bon Jovi in the music video for "Blaze of Glory". Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. BryanJ.
    Mar 1, 2006
    10
    This movie was great this is comming from a 16 year old the best movie i ever watched.. really for those who say this movie was horrible you dont know any movies you shouldnt be saying any thing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. Kevin
    Mar 28, 2006
    1
    Awful and unthoughtful. Not a movie. A second-rate music video version of the stage musical. Adam Pascal achieves new heights of awfulness with his performance.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. JulienP.
    Apr 1, 2006
    10
    Rent was pure exhileration! I absolutely loved this movie. It has great acting and great music. Everything a movie should be! By far my favorite movie of the year!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. JakeM-
    Nov 22, 2005
    0
    Everyone has AIDS! AIDS! AIDS! AIDS! AIDSAIDSAIDSAIDSAIDSAIDS AIDS!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. PeterB.
    Nov 22, 2005
    8
    The film needed a visual, edgy director to bring the material to live. The musical has great music and a strong book, but Columbus was a bland choice who doesn't bring any passion or point of view to the story. It seems like someone is saying "Next Song..ok check the song list, thanks."
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. Alexa
    Nov 23, 2005
    0
    Was NOT good at all. do not see!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. SarahM.
    Nov 23, 2005
    10
    I loved it. I thought Jesse Martin was absolutely fabulous. The Chicago remake was good, Rent was better.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. LeanneC.
    Nov 23, 2005
    10
    I love it! I don't understand how critics can say things like, why don't they get jobs? That is not only a comment to a person of priviledge, but it is a miss reading of the movie. The film is dedicated to people seeking careers and lives in things they are emotionally invested in. When's the last time you saw an accountant singing about how great life can be? Never, because he is practical. Practicality doesn't necessarily make one happy, that's the point. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. ZekeM.
    Nov 24, 2005
    0
    Loud and obnoxious, literally unbearable to watch
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. ErynS.
    Nov 24, 2005
    9
    i really really loved the movie. and i'm probably going to see it again. i overall thought it was great.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. BillB.
    Nov 24, 2005
    8
    OK, it was a faithful -- and safe -- adaptation of the original, but it mostly worked for me. If Columbus had changed things, people would be howling.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. AllisonZ.
    Nov 24, 2005
    10
    This is one of the best movies I have ever seen. Don't let the negative critics, who obviously just do not get it, stop you from seeing this film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. LoriMcK.
    Nov 24, 2005
    10
    Having seen the musical on-stage in the States and in England, I was eagerly anticipating this movie. I was NOT disappointed. This is a movie I will see over and over again - and love every minute. Excellent performances from the cast; excellent directing from Chris Columbus.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. MarkB.
    Nov 24, 2005
    10
    Im very courious about the peeps who are giving this movie a rating of 5-0,weather they have A.) actually seen this.B.) From some good awful red state or C.) are Homophobic. This movie was great..It has on flaw it will be veryhard to stand on it's own without constant comparison to the stage show. I HIghly recommend this film!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. JamesN.
    Nov 27, 2005
    10
    Absolutely loved it!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. JimB
    Nov 28, 2005
    8
    The movie didn't have the 'punch' of the show on stage. But is that just the difference between the stage and movies? The music was still terrific.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. Julie
    Nov 29, 2005
    4
    Not as fun as the live stage version. Its fun to hear the songs again for $10 not bad. Favorite number was the Tango Maureen. Watch out for the cheesy flashback sequences and the fake cold breath..... not worth it for the holiday season!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. WakoJako
    Nov 30, 2005
    6
    The best I can say about this film is that I didn't hate it. About as good as The Phantom of the Opera. I know that is not saying much. It's just that if there was ever a musical begging for reinvention...well, this was it. Kudos to the cast, for earnestness and overall average to great acting. But one will only have to wonder what an inspired director might have delivered. Think of what Chicago's director did cinematically with the very stylized stage show. Instead, Columbus merely seems to have tried to transpose the theatrical stagings to the screen. For instance, he uses one of the shows most boring scenes (Season's of Love) to open the movie, but rather than finding a creative way to present the song, he merely duplicates the theatrical staging. It did nothing for me other than pay homage to the show's most boringly staged song. Anyway, too bad, because I really liked the show and the music. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. DWilly
    Dec 1, 2005
    6
    If you like musicals, this will do for an evening. Yes, it's corny in the way of people breaking into song in an artificial environment; and, yes, the actors are ten years too old to be playing characters behaving this way sympathetically (strealing, drugging, and inveighing: "Yuppie Scum!"); but the music and the voices and the commitment is so damn good, and with the AIDS epidemic providing a through line of gravitas... if you're in the mood, it's a kick. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. Sprocketholes
    Dec 2, 2005
    3
    RENT is not a good film. At no time did I emotionally connect with this film; however, I had no trouble emotionally connecting with the stage production both times I saw it. Bad direction, really bad photography and inept editing. I am telling you, the camera is almost always in the wrong place. The production is a real mess. A lot of praise is being heaped on Rosario Dawson, but she is really an amateur compared to Daphne Rubin-Vega who originated the role of Mimi (and who I saw perform it on stage). The play won a Pulitzer, but this film won't win any good awards. I say skip it like the plague and go see the play if and when a well reviewed revival comes your way. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. PaulL.
    Dec 25, 2005
    9
    I thoroughly enjoyed the film. Having not seen the play, i had nothing to base it on...but found it to be full of heart and sincerity. Cornball as it can be, the film is moving and touching in it's enthusiasm to please.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. rachelb.
    Dec 4, 2005
    10
    Best musical made into a film in decades!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. Caryn
    Dec 5, 2005
    10
    I think this was the best i loved that movie i love the songs in that movie also i rate this movie one of the best and hope to see it is chicago that whould be fun!!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. SeanH
    Dec 8, 2005
    10
    Wonderful. The LA Times critic doesn't liek it because it's not about glamour and fame. Well, like the rest of us, it is about real life and its just wonderful.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. BradM.
    Dec 8, 2005
    3
    Disliked the play, now the movie. It's annoying when the characters sing the dialogue instead of just musical numbers. Depressing, too.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. D.L.Brunner
    Dec 9, 2005
    6
    Of the musicals, Walk the Line was better.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. KateW.
    Jan 3, 2006
    9
    This entertaining, touching film is faithful to the theatrical production while enhancing its emotional impact.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. NickE.
    Jan 7, 2006
    2
    Horrible. Loose plot, kitschy music, pretty much the most overly sentimental movie I've seen in years.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. SahagG.
    Jan 9, 2006
    10
    The best, and least appreciated movie of the year! Brilliant!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. IsaacR.
    Jan 9, 2006
    0
    Literally, this has to be the worst movie I've ever seen in my life. I'm not the type that gives all movies either a "10" or a "0," but this movie was just so awful that I think it actually depressed me a little. Not from the plot of the movie, but from the awful taste this movie left in my mouth. After a few numbers I took a bathroom break; as I left the theatre there were at least ten people (mostly men) who had actually left the theatre because it was so awful. My girlfriend was in the theatre, and I was tempted to stay outside as well, but I sat through the rest of it, and to my expense. I think my IQ has drastically shot down since the film. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. joeUSA
    Feb 13, 2006
    0
    A most horrible attempt at anything remotly resembling actual life. In the stand point of diversity, im sorry 9/10 people do not have aids, and there is such a thing as a part time job. To actually pay the rent that the worthless life that was in that disgusting "musical" could not pay. This makes you not only a bum, but also a deadbeat that should learn how the real world actually works.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. LukeM.
    Feb 27, 2006
    9
    This is a pretty good movie, that deserves more credit then it got. I thought that it couldave been shortened up a bit, but overall, it should be watched if you are even mildly interested in musicals or drama.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. PaulG.
    Mar 10, 2006
    10
    Rent is a modern day adaptation to a classic production. Chris Columbus does a remarkable job at ressurecting this amazing musical to a film version. Rent deserves much more credit than it recieved. The musical composures are simply inspiring and the connection between characters is enough to drive a person to tears. This is one amazing move I will surely watch over and over.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  44. JustinC.
    Mar 1, 2006
    7
    Film critics were harsh on this film adaptation, and though it doesn't execute the same as watching the stage production...it's really not that fallible against it. So why did musical critics rave about Rent, not to mention giving it a Pulitzer Prize and a Tony, and film critics detest the story on film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  45. LexieT.
    Mar 12, 2006
    10
    i absolutly loved this movie. The camera work complemented the songs and the way the film moved. this movie reached the core in me until the credits rolled. i found the way that angel died so moving and, unlike on stage, you were able to see what dying of AIDS really looked like. even though i have never seen the theater production of rent, i found this movie incredibly moving and meaningful
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. Eddy
    May 15, 2006
    10
    This was the most spectacular film my eyes have ever even dreamed of watching. I truly believe this film has changed my aspect of life. This movie was and still is my favorite movie of all time. I am not going to lie, I cried..... alot, and Anthony Rapp's preformance was flawless. He is now my most favorite actor. I have not yet seen it on brodway, but mark my words..... I WILL!!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  47. JasmineM.
    Aug 22, 2006
    10
    Rent is an inprirational movie. Based on Jonathon Larson's "baby" as he calls it, I believe this movie can allow people to feel better on whatever it is that they believe in. It can give them the ease to let them be whoever they are: homosexual or with an illness people don't even want to begin to imagine. I give this a definite 10.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  48. RyanC.
    Jan 4, 2008
    3
    Roger Ebert once said of "North": "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it." This quote expresses exactly how I feel about Rent. I do not think the film is abysmal in the traditional sense of the word. It isn't painful to watch, in that the direction or acting is horrible. Rather, this movie is infuriating and insulting because it tells the story of characters whose motto seems to be "Live life exactly how you want it, with no regards for the consequences" but expects us to feel bad for these characters when horrible things happen to them. It's schmaltzy and over-wrought. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. ColinF
    Nov 19, 2005
    10
    Phenomenal! Idina Menzel makes an Oscar worthy performance. Rosario Dawson gives life, energy, and reality to Mimi. A master work both for fans of the stage musical and for those seeing it for the first time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  50. MarkR.
    Nov 20, 2005
    10
    I got the opportunity to preview this film, and all I can say is wow. I never had the chance to see the musical on stage, but I've had the soundtrack for years. It was phenomenal for those of us who can't necessarily pay $100 to see it in person to see it on film. I believe the message of Rent is too people in my financial bracket, so I am so thankful for the film version. It brought tears to my eyes and everyone to their feet. This is a brilliant film, I highly encourage you to see it. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  51. AlexandraA.
    Nov 22, 2005
    10
    Marvelous! Touching, funny, and fresh, yet comfortably familiar for us Broadway fans. Tracie Thoms and Jesse L. Martin light up the screen, as does Anthony Rapp. Wilson Jermaine Heredia is an absolute gem.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  52. ChrisB.
    Nov 23, 2005
    10
    I've read all the reviews and just saw the movie, and it seems that some of the negative reviewers clearly don't get it. These performers were there when this Pullitzer Prize-winning drama was born, and they and Mr. and Mrs. Larson are the only critics I need. Open your heart, mind, and soul to Rent, and enjoy it as much as I did.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  53. derrick
    Nov 23, 2005
    10
    Movies rarely capture the true essence of stage shows, but "rent" is a fine example of how a moving, emotional play can become a truly dramatic and dynamic film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. I.A.Serra
    Nov 23, 2005
    10
    The audience in the theater was so excited while watching this film I hope it reaches not only the core fans base but the mainstream as well. Coming from the director of Home Alone and the first Harry Potter I expected something less authentic to please everyone. I was wrong: Rent: the movie is truly faithful to the original musical while taking advantage of the cinematic possibilities in explaining visually the character's past, while paying tribute to the 90', a time that seems now rather distant. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  55. MilesM.
    Nov 23, 2005
    5
    I saw RENT in 1996, when it first came out on stage and became a cultural phenomena. Although I loved the songs back then, I felt the musical itself, (plot and structure) were not up to par. And actually a bit simplistic. Here is a musical that celebrates the right to be mediocre, while it makes the enemy of the one minority trying to make his community better. Here is a musical that pretends to celebrate individuality by being mass pop corn entertainment so bland, that it never stands on its own. I have seen Gap ads with more artistic gravitas. However, what made the play worth the while back then is the same element that makes it now. A SUPERB CAST! And this cast surely delivers, making their roles deeper with time and more meaningful. Can Idina Menzel be any more talented than she already is? I don't think so. Still the movie suffers from the same problems the play does. It glorifies not artistic integrity, not taking risks in life, not even living a life well lived. It celebrates youth's right to chose to be mediocre, selfish, and largely lazy. We have a rich kid, Mark, who wants to be a film maker. A poor film maker indeed, someone should just tell him to give it all up. A film maker he will never be. When he chooses to burn his screenplays,to keep warm, this is a large miscalculation in the writer's part. A true artists would rather freeze to death than let those things he slaved over burn. Mark is an example of the whinny wannabe artist who lacks the talent or the drive to be a true artist. It's a shame, because the actor gives a pretty darn good performance. The same can be said of Roger, the singer, spending a year to write a song, this is a guy who should feel the ticking of the clock, HIV+, but still unwilling to grow up and give up his immature ways. I like the songs of RENT, for the most part, like I like a Britney Spears album, it's fluffy sentimentality (largely over hyped in 1996) it is adorable at places, and a lot of fun. I am not saying the movie is terrible, I am saying the source material is highly flawed. The enemy is an African American guy who becomes their landlord, and then tells them he is gonna turn the building into something "we always dreamed about" if they always dreamed about it, why do they stand so against him. Surely, their needs to make their dreams come true would outweigh all else. Surely the need to better the community by bringing in positive influences would make the sacrifice worth it. Sure there were homeless people to think about, but wouldn't a giving,sharing person, see that by helping themselves they could help everyone around them. But no, these characters never think in self less ways, they are obsessed by wanting to leave their marks in the world, and they go about it by doing everything that is opposite to leaving their mark. They are petulant and immature. They, as written are everything they sing about hating. Maybe that is the trick, maybe the musical really is about a bunch of people who hate themselves and their inability to be unique creators. Rent is a product of the end of the 20th Century. It is about my generation screaming, "Look, Don't you feel sorry for me. I am trying so hard." But trying so hard to achieve what. In the end, I guess Love is the answer. The problem is, these people spend so little time loving each other, you're surprised they come to that conclusion, 525,600 minutes later, you are asked to be overjoyed, because they sing, NO DAY BUT TODAY... but what exactly do they do during that day is never answered. This is a movie about wasted DAYS. However, the cast is great, the songs are catchy. And someone may someday be inspired by to write something that is truly reflective of youth's struggle Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  56. ShawnS.
    Nov 23, 2005
    10
    THIS WAS AWESOME !!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  57. DonnaS.
    Nov 23, 2005
    9
    It was everything I hoped it would be and more. If you don't like musicals, don't go see it. IT'S A MUSICAL!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  58. DarylB.
    Nov 23, 2005
    9
    The story now is more of an historical account of the 1990's rather than one of of today, but that does not diminish the power of the drama. The musical numbers are filled withexplosive energy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  59. BOBW.
    Nov 23, 2005
    1
    This movie was dead on arrival. It is loud and energetic but says little. Sound and fury signifiying nothing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  60. PauS.
    Nov 23, 2005
    9
    Misses is the energy of the stage show but story and message remain whole.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  61. RussellL-H
    Nov 24, 2005
    0
    I LOVE Rent the musical. I can't beleive I am writing this, but I HATE Rent teh movie. Awful awful awful awful. no energy, no emotion, no point. Honestly, one of the worst movies I've seen a a LONG time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  62. AndrewM.
    Nov 24, 2005
    8
    Having seen the broadway hit, the silver screen version was a little bit of a disappointment. However, after realizing that a movie could in no way capture the edgyness or raw talent that the stage demands, i accepted Columbus' adaptation as a wonderful movie. It was generally true to the original story, the songs were well performed, and unlike many theatre-movie transformations, the plot was quite easy to understand. All in all, it was very entertaining, in a thoughtful, rough-around-the-edges sort of way. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  63. Beth
    Nov 24, 2005
    10
    I am astounded by all the negative reviews. I left the theater with a huge smile on my face and wanting to hug everyone as I walked down the street. Is that so terrible?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  64. AmandaG.
    Nov 24, 2005
    10
    Loved it soooo much. Great adaptation of the musical. Have seen it twice, will see it several more times before it goes to DVD, and of course I wil buy the DVD!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  65. DerekW.
    Nov 24, 2005
    9
    I strongly believe that the critics that have been giving this film low scores just do not have the mental, or creative capacity to understand something as unique and revolutionary as RENT. The stroy and and the MUSIC take the audience member to another level of love and understanding - and if you are not ready to go on that journey you cannot blame the film, the writer, or the director, for you being ignorant and too stubborn to open yourself to something new. Go see this film with an open mind and the story it tells with music will fill your heart and take you to another level of entertainment. Leaving you with a meesage of the current generation. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  66. BlueyS.
    Nov 25, 2005
    0
    Simply awful!! I LOVED the musical when I saw it on Broadway. I've seen it several times onstage. This movie was the worst I've seen in a long time. Don't waste your money, but more importantly your time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  67. JuliaR.
    Nov 25, 2005
    10
    i absolutely loved it. i have already seen it 4 times. It was evocative and daring and absolutely wonderful. it sent out such a good message!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  68. SusanS.
    Nov 25, 2005
    7
    Actually, about a 7.8...it's what we all feared would happen when the man most known for directing Home Alone and the two bad Harry Potter movies got his hands on the musical that brought a younger, hipper crowd to the Broadway scene. However, even the king of schmaltz couldn't completely ruin Jonathon Larson's dynamic, edgy, witty, energetic retelling of La Boheme. He manages to take out just about everything that made the show appeal to the hipsters, but he manages to keep the message intact. I enjoyed the movie a lot, and really enjoyed seeing most of the original cast doing their thing, but I missed the dark humor and irony that drove the original conception. Columbus did what he does best, watering down profound concepts until even your grandparents won't be offended in addition to turning jokes and sass in melodrama, but the material is strong enough on it's own to hold up as a good watch. A really good watch at that, compared to what was coming out in the mainstream around it. For the pedestrian movie-goer, this movie might be both shocking and insightful--this is good, but Rent-heads might be slightly disappointed when the lines that they're singing in their heads have been replaced by odd-sounding spoken dialogue or empty music. But please, for the sake of Jonathon Larson's legacy and the outstanding performances by the original cast, go see it. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  69. SethB.
    Nov 25, 2005
    8
    As a musical onstage or otherwise, Rent is not that strong. Some songs feel forced such as the title song and others come off sounding like a high school production. There are good songs such as "I Should Tell You", "Will You Light My Candle" and my personal fav, "Take Me For What I Am". That being said, the real strength of this story (onstage or otherwise) is it's honesty, and emotion. In this it shines and works just fine. Some reveiwers have said this unrealistic. Those people obviously know nothing about the climate in NYC's East Village in the late 80's and early 90's. You can easily dismiss them as ignorant. Others have said this is not for kids. To a point I must agree, due to the realism I mentioned. Very young kids will probably not be suited to veiw this material, but I think older kids can handle it. If not this can be a spring board for discussion about sex, homosexuality, and life in general. Issues that they will most definitely have to deal with in this current world. All in all, an entertaining film. I loved it! Strong performances by Jesse L. Martin and Rosario Dawson. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  70. RogerC.
    Nov 25, 2005
    0
    I'm a big fan of the stage show but God was this adaptation awful. We're talking down to the basics - blurry shots, faces covered in shadow to conceal bad lip syncing or bad acting, focusing the camera on the exterior of a building almost a minute into a song that's being performed by someone inside the building, screenplay that's more intent on making the film one long music video than character development, RHYMING dialogue barely edited at all from the stage libretto, very theatrical opening (on a stage) with NO CONTEXT, and one of the most rushed endings in the history of film. F- from me. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  71. JodiW.
    Nov 26, 2005
    10
    I saw the play with the original cast. I have seen it on stage another 5 times since the original cast memebers left. It was mind blowing to see everyone back together and to remember what originally made this show so amazing. Bravo to all involved.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  72. NickB
    Nov 26, 2005
    5
    A self-proclaimed "Renthead," I hoped I was going to enjoy the film. I didn't. The charm, bite, and character of the musical didn't transfer well enough to the big screen. I thought they handled it well, the cast was great with what they were given, but there is something missing. There is no "so what" factor. The movie just sort of sits there. And there were way too many cheesey moments that were too far fetched for an audience to buy into. Angel and Collins running down the street singing "I Will Cover You," the god-awful exploitation of Rosario Dawson's Mimi, and a lack of sympathy for the film characters all added to a so-so show. The negative aside, it is still a solid musical with flare and gusto, but I would save your 10 bucks and put your money towards something better, like the actual stage show. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  73. TaraL-H
    Nov 26, 2005
    0
    Yuck. yuck. yuck. I loved the stage show and could not wait for the film version. I was stunned by its lack of energy, pacing, context, passion. I left after the first hour was over. I am deeply saddened, but if those of us who consider ourselves fans of Rent the Musical are to be honest - hard to see how any of us could be fans of Rent the Movie. Truly awful film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  74. ClaytonT.
    Nov 27, 2005
    10
    The movie had its flaws true but the important thing is that it still transended that ever so important message of NO DAY BUT TODAY. I am a huge fan of the stage show and got everything i need to get out of the movie and the two new additions to the cast were superb. Rosario was amazing and joanne was way more pleasing than the original.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  75. AlE.
    Nov 27, 2005
    2
    Alas... Maybe "The Producers" will show all the fakers how you make a real movie musical. For the love of all that is holy, let's hope so.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  76. PeterA.
    Nov 27, 2005
    8
    I really enjoyed this movie. It had flaws (what movie doesn't?)...but I think RENT suffers from essentially a bias people have against movie musicals. I really believe this (though I have no data to support this) that movie musicals have to be BETTER than the average movie for people to like it. In other words, people tend to be skeptical going in and the movie has to outperform itself to be well-liked. I don't know if this has to do with the idea of people breaking out into song makes some go "aw, come on!" Any problems I had with the movie had to do with the source material, though I do think the script could have been a bit punchier--I mean, if you are going to add dialogue to a sung-through piece, it needs to be better than what we saw in the film. I suppose in the end, how you feel about RENT will color your opinion of this movie. My ex-bf hates RENT and big surprise, he hated the movie! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  77. ScottM.
    Nov 27, 2005
    3
    I'm sure the stage show is good.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  78. Kathy
    Nov 28, 2005
    10
    A wonderful adaptation of an amazing musical!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  79. BrianC.
    Nov 28, 2005
    8
    Having seen the stage musical a few times and listened to the soundtrack a few hundred times, my opinion of the movie will obviously be somewhat biased. So take this review with a grain of salt. The Good - great performances by the stage cast, who did a good job of translating their performances to film; the songs of course were terrific and all of the best songs were left mostly intact, with some of the weaker songs left out; some interesting "movie-like" interpretations of the musical numbers (including an entirely new middle sequence that was almost entirely spoken) helped tell the story a little better than in the stage version; the Angel tribute scene was well done and appropriately emotional/powerful. The Bad - Rosario Dawson's performance was a bit uneven, good at times, awkward/lousy at others; liked the idea of some of the "flashback" sequences, but thought they were overly cheesy/obvious; although the anticlimatic ending was true to the stage version, I wished Columbus could've tweaked it a little to make it translate better on film; like Phantom of the Opera, I wished more liberties were taken with the original material to make it work better as a film. Overall, I had a great time, but it just made me nostalgic for the stage version. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  80. rcunard
    Nov 28, 2005
    1
    This is the second worst movie I have ever seen (it was right behind Freddie Got Fingered). None of the characters were likable and the plot was scattered and boring. I thought they all should have ponied up the dough for the apartment, rather than expecting someone to let them live there for free so that they could bellow some of the most ridiculous songs ever sung.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  81. MartinZ.
    Nov 28, 2005
    0
    Actuallly -10, seems a better rating. I sure the stage version had its up and downs. Watching the film version only produced two rather sarcastic remarks from this viewer 1)FAME on steroids. 2) Angels in America Light. Not to take anything from the author but in production they missed a que or two.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  82. MaryJ
    Nov 30, 2005
    10
    I've never seen the stage musical, but LOVED this movie! I just loved the concept of taking the traditional musical format and adding a modern twist to it. The music was great - I bought the CD right after seeing the movie and it's been on constant rotation ever since! It's got your standard melodic anthems that stick to your head as well as some more experimental fare such as the Tango number and Maureen's protest performance piece. The performances were all great, yes even Rosario Dawson! I loved how the relationship between Tom and Angel was portrayed - it was definitely the emotional cornerstone of the movie for me. Were there flaws? Sure, it's Christopher Columbus afterall. He isn't exactly subtle, but I think like Phantom of the Opera, the original material is so good that the director would've had to really try to make it bad. In the end, it's how you connect with the characters and your taste in the music (and musicials) that will determine whether you will enjoy this movie. I for one loved it! Of course, I also love musicals in general, I'm a bleeding heart liberal and I love New York in all its flavors, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. :) Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  83. Fantasy
    Nov 30, 2005
    1
    I walked out after 40 minutes as it was too depressing for words. I go to the movies to be entertained not to be bombarded with music about drug addicts and deadbeats. Not my cup of tea.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  84. rache
    Dec 1, 2005
    10
    Rent was so amazing. I saw it opening night and I'm seeing it for the 3rd time this weekend! All the cast did a fabulous job potraying their character's soles. All though I did not see the Broadway Production, I've heard the movie was just as good or better. RENT is a heart warming movie that really shows the importance for living life to the fulliest, and the love friends have for eachother. Idina Menzel my idol was amazing like usual, as well as the other cast memebers. I recommend this movie to anyone!! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  85. TiffanyD
    Dec 11, 2005
    10
    Awesome movie. I loved all the songs and i have the soundtrack now. I saw it 3 times in theaters and now i am looking forward to seeing it as the actual play. Broadway would be the best. I fell in love with all of the characters, especially Angel. I highly recommend everyone going to see it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  86. PrestonF.
    Dec 21, 2005
    6
    The music was disappointing if not outright bad. The story of a bunch of doped up slackers was hardly appealing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  87. shainar.
    Dec 21, 2005
    10
    Amazing, i couldn't stop thinking about the music, i went out and bought the CD and thats all i have been listening to, cant wait for the DVD to come out.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  88. SamP.
    Dec 2, 2005
    10
    "You'll see boy".
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  89. OscarM.
    Dec 2, 2005
    10
    One of the best film musicals in years -- exuberant, sexy and life affirming in equal measure.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  90. CraigV.
    Dec 29, 2005
    10
    I first saw the play Rent on Broadway with much of the same cast as is in this movie version. On stage, I thought it was brilliant and wonderful. On screen, it just came to life so much more. I thought this was an amazing movie. Completely breathtaking! Rosario Dawson was an amazing addition to the cast. Her voice is beautiful and she played Mimi wonderfully. I definitely recommend this film and it's accompanying soundtrack. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  91. danielle
    Dec 29, 2005
    5
    The songs were better than the movie itself. id rather see the broadway play than the movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  92. Joe
    Dec 3, 2005
    8
    I saw the stage show, and now the movie. One of the few stories on the mainstream media that doesn't turn real stories, with real people that really exist (despite what other reviewers may think) into Disneyeske over-sweetened bland goo. Some of us recognize settings and characters as real, for the times when we were flirting at the edges, during those years when rode fast, and we were curious and more dumb, perhaps. I felt while seeing it a little as attending a mini-Woodstock. All that, despite their taking on a song in the middle of a sentence, which takes a little gettiing used to. Great acting and singing, although the directing could have been more creative. I think C.Columbus missed another opportunity. But, all in all, a great movie with a great story, which is very much worth seeing, in my opinion. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  93. Mrs.Bloom
    Jan 22, 2006
    10
    This movie is so incredibly AMAZING! Everything; the story, the characters, the actors, and especially the music, is incredible! All of the actors (most of whom are from the original Broadway cast) are amazing actors and singers, and all of their performances shine in the movie! But what's especially amazing is that Chris Columbus diected it! He did an unexpededly wonderful job translating this hit Broadway musical to the big screen! RENT has seriously changed me (I'm hoping to see it on-stage soon), and it will seriously change you too. It's absolutely brilliant! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  94. CharlieN.
    May 17, 2006
    5
    Corny, cliched, and annoying. Why don't some of those characters just get a day job?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  95. WinkondeJ.
    Aug 21, 2006
    10
    Rent is the kind of film that comes around and changes lives. I thought it was wonderfully done. I have seen the musical on Broadway and all though some parts don't compare, it was still a great movie. If you didn't get anything out of Rent, you don't know what true beauty is.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  96. AmandaB.
    Nov 30, 2007
    7
    I'm a huge fan of the musical "Rent" and have been for years so of course I had to see it as a film. I loved that they used several members of the original cast but was disappointed by the amount of changes that were made. I guess I should have been expecting that more.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  97. chrish.
    Nov 22, 2005
    1
    Columbus couldn't have done worse.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  98. Ashleigh
    Nov 23, 2005
    9
    It is an absolute gem!!!! I have been a fan of the stage show for 8 years, and the film stayed true to the vision. The only reason that I did not give it a 10 is that for people who are not familiar with the stage version, I think the story progression could be slightly fragmented. But anyone who goes into with an open mind will LOVE it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  99. [Anonymous]
    Nov 23, 2005
    9
    If you have not seen the stage show, I feel that you can not truely encapsulate the entirety of the show. With that said, it is a damn good show other wise. I do not like that Chris felt the need to put a time stamp on the movie, especially since the music clearly makes a statement that it is in the mid-90s or even now (Alexi Darling refering to cell phones and email, Joanne making phone calls on her cell etc...) I feel the movie missed Mark's purpose in the show, and his plight at being "the last one standing." The movie goes in depth in certain points while missing entire points completely. Rosario Dawson does a phenominal job as Mimi, and truely captures the essence of not only struggling with AIDS but with having a drug addiction as well. Her descent is portrayed very well, as is the rise and fall of her and Roger's relationship. Maureen and Joanne's relationship also goes much more in depth in the movie than in the show. As always Angel and Collin's relationship is a heart wrenching love story, and portrayed to perfection by Jesse and Wilson. Rent-heads that know and love the show will truely appreciate it and take it for what it is as well as find the meaning. Those who have not seen the live show may struggle with knowing what all the hype is about. They will not understand what they are missing. I will be going to go see it again, and again! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  100. Angie
    Nov 23, 2005
    0
    We walked out half way through the movie. While the actors gave a passionate performance, the story line itself was very poor. There were individual scenes that had their "moments" but overall it was a bad movie going experience. This is the type of movie that will appeal only to very a specific moviegoer. Rent did a bad job connecting the mainstream audience member with the powerful and emotional story it is TRYING (but failed miserably) to tell. You sit there through the whole movie waiting and waiting and it fails to deliver... I had such high expectations for it too... Working actively in the young community, I thought this would tell a powerful and positive story, but the theme/message of "you only live once" sort of gave me the impression that its okay to use drugs.. Promoting drug use to audence members (esp. the kids around me) was very disturbing... But again, I walked out half way through so I didn't see the ending. The actors--great. The movie--sucks. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 35 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 35
  2. Negative: 4 out of 35
  1. One of the best film musicals in years -- exuberant, sexy and life affirming in equal measure.
  2. Reviewed by: David Rooney
    60
    Director Chris Columbus has pasted the grungy "La Boheme" update onto film with slavish respect for the original material but a shortage of stylistic imagination and raw emotions.
  3. Reviewed by: Jorge Morales
    50
    Instead of bringing a universal love story to the living present, the film traps it in a frozen past like a prehistoric bug in amber, as removed from moviegoers' experience as a dusty diorama at the American Museum of Natural History.