Metascore
32 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 31 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 31
  2. Negative: 16 out of 31
  1. 75
    The sci-fi thriller Repo Men gets off to a sluggish start. But wait. You have to give the movie time to find its groove and establish its premise.
  2. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    63
    Repo Men grafts moral ambiguity onto the action thriller, and the result is a weird but likably misshapen beast.
  3. 63
    One problem with Repo Men is that there's not enough material to sustain a 111-minute motion picture.
  4. 58
    It's a time-waster with brains, but ultimately not enough brains, and one that wastes too much time.
  5. 50
    Repo Men makes sci-fi's strongest possible case for universal health care.
  6. There's a good idea behind Repo Men, not a whole lot of thinking, but at least one whole idea.
  7. 50
    There is a mild pleasure in the sight of Jude Law pirouetting with a hacksaw through gangs of extras, but the amusement is notional. I actually don't find him terribly interesting as a kinetic object.
  8. If Repo Men could have sustained its ghoulish humor, it might have been a guilty pleasure.
  9. There's not a lot of humor here, just violence and more violence. The acting is fine enough - Whitaker, of the talented bunch, seems to be having the best time - but the slicing and dicing overpowers the cast, the story and everything else.
  10. It may have been a shrewd business decision by the film's director, Miguel Sapochnik, to treat the story as a nasty, comic thriller. But when, after a certain point, Repo Men subsumes its satire to strenuous action sequences, it loses its edge and turns into a chase movie of no special distinction.
  11. A grisly one-note chase thriller.
  12. The big problem here is that dark sci-fi satire works best when it aims for several targets. Repo Men aims at corporate greed, which is good, but doesn't fill in the details.
  13. A tedious example of speculative fiction.
  14. 40
    Where has all the fun science-fiction filmmaking gone?
  15. Reviewed by: Robert Abele
    40
    There's a key organ missing from the movie itself: a brain. In its place is a memory bank of other, better movies.
  16. As an account of how for-profit big business literally rips a consumer's heart out, Repo Men is too graphic for me.
  17. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    38
    Sitting through this movie is worse than being locked in a room with a continuous loop of "Nip/Tuck" playing on a jumbo screen.
  18. Reviewed by: Jordan Burchette
    38
    It's not cynically bad, it's simply a case of movie malpractice.
  19. 38
    This is not a bad cast, but whatever wit the script aims for is lost in the queasy details director Miguel Sapochnik found more fascinating.
  20. Reviewed by: Ian Buckwalter
    34
    The overused homages and a tacked-on twist ending are just failed attempts to save Repo Men from its own shallow blood lust.
  21. 33
    What could have been a biting, darkly comic action flick about capitalistic health care run amok is instead a familiar, gory, post-apocalyptic slog.
  22. Reviewed by: Andy Klein
    33
    Whitaker and Schreiber, both of whom are capable of brilliance, are stuck in one-dimensional roles. It's not only the characters who have mechanical organs; the film itself is equally lifeless and cold.
  23. Comprising reclaimed bits from "Blade Runner," "A Clockwork Orange" and "Children of Men" and glibly served up with hyper Guy Ritchie attitude by first-time feature director Miguel Sapochnik, the resulting in-your-face mess never knows what it wants to be when it grows up.
  24. 30
    It's sad when a bit of grim futuristic silliness like Repo Men falls short on all counts, down to the most basic level of entertainment value.
  25. 25
    Repo Men is a rare film where Toronto plays itself. It's also the first I've ever seen where a typewriter is used as a lethal weapon.
  26. The obvious question about Repo Men: Why bother?
  27. 20
    Should be immediately screened in film schools across the world as a shining example of everything that is wrong with the American studio system and the increasingly dreadful junk it produces.
  28. Reviewed by: Justin Chang
    20
    This ultra-gory speculative noir is, at its infrequent best, certifiably nuts; the rest of the time, it's one numbingly brutal slog.
  29. Reviewed by: Nick Pinkerton
    0
    The movie shares this premise with 2008's "Repo!: The Genetic Opera." It would be worth researching who ripped off whom if both weren't ghastly.
  30. Basically a soulless slasher flick, and one that demeans its gifted performers.
  31. 0
    Has exactly the same premise (Repo! The Genetic Opera).
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 68 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 30
  2. Negative: 9 out of 30
  1. TawneeP
    8
    Don't let a bad critic rating stop you from seeing this movie, it was good from start to finish and was defiantly worth seeing. Very entertaining! Full Review »
  2. ElPup
    9
    A movie that teaches one the value of credit. Great movie, though it's a little slow towards the middle which becomes understandable why later on. It is based off of the book Reposession Mambo (The same movie repo the genetic opera is based off of). It's not for the squeemish. I didn't find the gore anything excessive, but I have a super strong stomach. It's not a movie for everyone... But is quite enjoyable. Full Review »
  3. JohnS.
    3
    Interesting premise wasted on a crappy movie.