Smoke

Metascore
70

Generally favorable reviews - based on 15 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 15
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 15
  3. Negative: 1 out of 15

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. 100
    A sharply observant and witty film that plumbs unexpected depths of feeling.
  2. 88
    Each conversation has at least one memorable line, and it's always delivered in such a casual manner that it blends right in.
  3. Knockout ensemble performances like these don't come around all that often, though, and when they do they ought to be savored.
  4. 75
    A beguiling film about words, secrets and tobacco.
  5. Christian Science Monitor
    Reviewed by: Jeff Danziger
    75
    The action is talky and philosophical but in sweet celebration of everyman going nowhere.
  6. The best vignette, at the very end of the film, is the story Auster originally wrote for a newspaper as a Christmas piece, the one that inspired Wang to make Smoke in the first place. It's the one you'll want to inhale.
  7. A film of deceptive narrative wisps and intricate thematic curls.
  8. A showcase for Wang's greatest strengths as a film maker: a chance to explore friendships, connections and random serendipities.
  9. The delight of the movie is Keitel, who finally gets to play someone who doesn't look like he's about to mug you.
  10. An inviting but evanescent film that does have casualness, curiosity value and a lot of talent on its side.
  11. Pretty to look at but contrived and somewhat stagy.
  12. Reviewed by: David Stratton
    70
    Too often goes off on a tangent with unessential anecdotes and then fails to deliver in more important areas.
  13. A wonderfully unhurried and precious yarn.
  14. 70
    A celebration of buddies and butts, it's an unconventionally structured, wonderfully acted group portrait of the regulars at a Brooklyn cigar store.
  15. Despite a certain grace in the dialogue and casual plot construction, this is positively reeking of a desire to be cheerful in the face of adversity.
User Score
8.1

Universal acclaim- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 0 out of 2
  1. Jun 19, 2016
    8
    The artistic medium of film is very subjective. Every audience member has a different set of criteria they use to measure their viewingThe artistic medium of film is very subjective. Every audience member has a different set of criteria they use to measure their viewing experience. Not everyone shares the same set of criteria. If we did, what a bland and uninspired world this would be.

    What I Personally Liked About "Smoke":
    One thing you should know about me is that I have always had a preference for dialogue films. Productions which feature those most intimate of human dramas that rely heavily on intellectual banter to supply the bulk of their characterization. While it is certainly not everyone's cup of tea, it is one of my personal favorite sub-genres. Writer Paul Auster has crafted a finely honed blade able to cut deeply into the vein of the living cinematic entity and let its blood flow freely onto the screen. This exceptional writing is aided by a very open performance from star Harvey Keitel. Over the years leading up to this motion picture, Keitel was normally known as the tense, hard-boiled actor who breathed life (sometimes violently so) into movies such as "Mean Streets," "Reservoir Dogs," and "Bad Lieutenant." To see him here as Auggie Wren was a revelation. For some reason, before my first viewing of this film, I didn't think that he and co-star William Hurt would have a lot of chemistry. However, they work in marvelous unison, particularly during the scene when Auggie shows Hurt's character Paul Benjamin his life's work of photographs taken one each morning at the same time in the same location. It is a beautifully rendered scene showing two thespians at the height of their careers. An additional note, the last song heard in the film (the one played over the end credits) has to be my favorite version of "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes" and is a sad reminder of the talent we lost when musician Jerry Garcia passed away two months after the film's U.S. release.

    What I Personally Disliked About "Smoke":
    While the majority of the primary characters are wonderful, there's just something about Ruby McNutt that I cannot get into. It's not Stockard Channing's fault as she does the best she can. It's just that the character seems a shade or two off when compared with the people surrounding her. Each portrayal in the film is filled with unique subtleties; however, they all seem to blend together. Ruby just doesn't connect with the material in the same fashion. It's like she's standing just outside the circle and is looking for a way in. I'm also not that wild about the location used for the smoke store interiors. It doesn't have enough personality of its own to match its inhabitants and it doesn't afford cinematographer Adam Holender much space to work with. That's a shame when you consider the airy visuals he gives to both the outdoor settings and to Benjamin's apartment.

    My Overall Impression of "Smoke":
    Its minor shortcoming set aside, this movie is a great slice of cinematic Americana. While it didn't seem to garner as much attention as some of director Wayne Wang's other films from the era ("The Joy Luck Club" anyone?), it does leave a more lasting impression. If you like intricate dramas that promote cerebral discourse over chaotic decadence, then this film is for you.
    Full Review »
  2. TimB.
    Feb 7, 2006
    8
    An overall wonderful story line, that inspires the best of a person. The story does have its dull moments, and does leave for individual An overall wonderful story line, that inspires the best of a person. The story does have its dull moments, and does leave for individual conclusions to be made in the end. Secrets and smoke hang over the characters, but end the end, the smoke seems to clear, revealing a nicely worked story line between the characters. Full Review »