- Studio: MCA/Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 22, 1999
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
95Scott Hicks adapts David Guterson's best-selling novel as if it was poetry.
-
88Uusually satisfying in the way it unfolds.
-
88The kind of richly layered film that Hollywood seldom attempts, much less brings off. But it's more than brought off here in grand, solid style and beautifully crafted detail.
-
75Reflective, deliberate, building gradually to a climax that left me touched.
-
70Flawed, but fascinating, this somber adaptation of David Guterson's award-winning novel is sometimes sluggish and difficult to follow, but it's also unexpectedly poetic.
-
67Fails to completely engage the viewer at the basic level of story.
-
67As good as it is in many ways, the film is not as emotionally gripping as it should be, and comes off as a rather predictable liberal statement.
-
62Hicks is far less interested in resolving dramatic conflicts than in framing shots.
-
50Movies made from serious novels are often ridiculed as unworthy of their sources, but this one may be too worthy -- too reverent, too showy, too earnest.
-
50Too chilly and distanced to build the emotional impact it would like to have.
-
50A prettily photographed yet morbidly gloomy movie.
-
50Ultimately there's something too measured, too controlled in his film.
-
50As cosmetically sanitized revisions of history go: This is as good as it gets.
-
50Compelling almost in spite of itself, thanks to the impressionistic imagery of cinematographer Robert Richardson.
-
50Exceedingly blurred rendering of a simply told, artful novel.
-
50For all the beauty it struggles to bring forth, Snow Falling on Cedars is painfully prosaic.
-
50Not a crowd-pleasing, or even audience-oriented, movie; it's a two-hour-plus mood piece.
-
50Has to fight to hold our attention and it doesn't always succeed.
-
50Essentially a liberal soap opera.
-
40This badly muddled adaptation of a complex novel chases after Guterson's many skeins and themes with no unifying principle in mind.
-
40You just watch one carefully constructed but emotionally vacant image piled up on another - sometimes with regard to an overall effect, but often just for the sake of style over substance.
-
40Impeccably crafted but dramatically dull.
-
40Never transports you to another place and time, as it intends to.
-
38The year's most beautiful movie -- and surely one of the dullest.
-
30The narrative chronology is so heavily hacked about, its tenses so addled and the material so thinly spread across so many characters, one can scarcely keep it straight in one's head without going cross-eyed.
-
30Trying to act in this movie is like trying to stand upright in a blizzard.
-
30Admirably high-minded and visually gorgeous but fatally anesthetized by its own grandiosity.
-
30All shots and no scenes, which is nice for a picture book but deadly for drama.
-
30Loaded with facile social themes, opaque characters, pointlessly intricate flashbacks, and inflated technique.
-
25Looks exquisite, but don't bother digging deeper.
-
25Ultimately groans under the weight of its own quiet gorgeousness.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 5 out of 6
-
Mixed: 1 out of 6
-
Negative: 0 out of 6
-
LunaM.4
-
SusanF.10Mesmerizing film- beautifully done - provacative and above all heart wrenching movie.