- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Feb 18, 2005
User Score
7.2
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 226 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 158 out of 226
-
Mixed: 5 out of 226
-
Negative: 63 out of 226
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
GavinCJul 27, 20093Childish, unfunny, and boring.
-
-
JamesS.May 15, 20100This movie stinks! Where's Jim Carrey?!
-
-
PatP.Feb 17, 20050Crappy movie.
-
-
brigitteB.Mar 4, 200510The movie is so much better than the critcs are saying i was astounded. funny, charming, spectacular visuals. a ton of fun.
-
-
dons.Mar 4, 200510better than the first movie. i enjoyed seeing this with my kids who wouldn't stop talking about their favorite scenes for hours. packed with great scenes. very funny.
-
-
paulateMar 4, 200510Wildly entertaining. not without flaws but so unique and funny i have to give it a 10.
-
-
ELAMar 22, 200510Mad action. outstanding family flick.
-
-
DKMar 4, 200510Inventive, crazy, hilarious.
-
-
steveMApr 20, 20051Who are all these people giving this movie 10? I suspect it is the same studio person as the writing style is very similar. How desperate!
-
-
PammyJul 1, 20059Jamie kennedy is so funny. and so is the movie. thank you.
-
-
MikeS.May 16, 201010My kids want to watch this movie over and over. Very funny, crazy film.
-
-
a.f.Feb 14, 20050I believe the question is why?
-
-
VinceH.Feb 28, 20052
-
-
maMar 22, 200510It totally grew on me, so i saw it twice. if it's your thing, you will really enjoy this.
-
-
paulsMar 22, 200510Funny, funny, funny movie.
-
-
jhMar 22, 200510Almost didn't go because of the reviews. glad i went. more than a kid's movie. unlike anything else. reminds me of roger rabbit but different and funnier. a very good movie.
-
-
maewMar 22, 200510I loved this movie. THE CRITICS ARE MORONS!
-
-
rachelp.Mar 3, 200510Cool movie and very funny. a solid cast. far, far better than i expected given the reviews. i want to see it again.
-
-
RingoS.Mar 7, 20050This is a steaming pile of garbage.
-
-
KathyCMay 25, 200510
-
-
BKerrMay 26, 20059
-
-
JohnC.Jul 10, 20071The worst movie I have ever seen. Not funny, lame, and Jamie Kennedy needs to realize he is not Jim Carrey and he cannot attempt the same slap stick humor it just looks so bad that you almost feel sorry for the poor looser.
-
-
BobbybNov 1, 20094Where's Jim Carey? He's not dead, or at least i don't think he's dead. I mean, he did eat that bomb at the end of the first one. Anyways, They needed him very badly in this film. The main problem with the whole movie that I had was that they didn't really use the mask and the whole GOD thing just made it seem even stupider than it actually was.
-
-
JoeKriticFeb 16, 200510
-
-
JubyBubyFeb 16, 20050The worst film of all time? Could be! It makes the "Police Academy" films look funny.
-
-
JimH.Feb 17, 20051Junk!
-
-
JohnN.Feb 17, 20050Don't waste your time or money.
-
-
ChadS.Feb 21, 20053
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 21, 20050The fact that people actually went to this movie and thought it might be good is so sad that I have lost all hope for humanity. Come on, Son of Mask!?
-
-
BitBurnMar 14, 20051Totally retarded and dumb. What a waste of money.
-
-
CraigMMar 3, 200510Funniest movie i have seen in 2005. The story and scene work is clever and the live action cartoon visuals inspired.
-
-
SamHMar 3, 200510Extremely funny and insane. My kids loved it. And I enjoyed it to. Funny, funny, funny and fun to watch.
-
-
CinemaWorldMar 3, 200510Inspired lunacy. Unpredictable story lines. I loved it.
-
-
KKApr 21, 20050By far......the WORST movie I ever saw. It was physically painful for me to sit in my seat and after 25 minutes, my children (3 and 8-year olds) wouldn't even sit through it......nuff said.
-
-
NecoMay 20, 20052Don't watch it and for heavens sake don't buy the DVD!!!
-
-
stephwMay 25, 200510Much better than expected. I don't care that Jim Carrey isn't in it. The cast is good and the movie is great. The best movie I have seen for parents and kids since the Incredibles. A really cool movie.
-
-
SamJun 16, 20051
-
-
LoganHSep 12, 20060I watched this movie hoping that there would be some sign of JIm Carry, but sadly no.The special effects sucked, and what was up with Jamie Kennedy's face when he put it on. Worst movie I have ever seen
-
-
FrankS.Nov 10, 20070An 8 out 10...an 8 out of 10!!!??? If their was any proof that America's IQ is going down the crapper, one can look no farther than the poor souls that gave this an 8 or higher. A movie directed with all the subtlety of a jackhammer and wit of Pauly Shore...It is pure garbage.
-
-
xxhopingtearsxxApr 29, 20070To make a sequel to the Mask, you must include Jim Carrey. Or else, it just wont be the sequel to the Mask.. Pitiful.
-
-
UghLeeMay 30, 20073I love how there are either 10s or 1's as people's score. You don't see any 5s or 6s... which means you either love or hate it. i hate it. Maybe would have been ok if i was 15 years younger.
-
-
SethBDec 6, 20090
-
-
sonicphotoDec 11, 20052Son of the mask just doesn't quite cut it with the absense of Jim Carrey and the fact that is more based on the kid's crazy stuff then the actual mask. Is not a bad thing but some jokes feel old and overall the plot and story are too bland. Kids could find good things here and there but teenagers and adults won't find that much enjoyment on this one.
-
-
AllyD.Feb 14, 20051Sucked! I got free tickets and I feel like I wasted 90 minutes of my time.
-
-
JimL.Feb 16, 20050Son of the mask is pure garbage. The director Lawrence Guterman is using it to advance kidde porno. He is disgusting.
-
-
JackM.Feb 16, 20050
-
-
RoryC.Feb 18, 20058I caught this movie at a screening the other day, and I was pretty happy with it. Overall, the special effects, while being a bit much, were pretty entertaining, as was Jamie Kennedy's performance. It was a nice lighthearted movie, pretty much the anti-Constantine. If you're into this kind of movie (like if you have kids), then you'll do well seeing this film.
-
-
BMFeb 24, 20056
-
-
JimFeb 25, 20051This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It lacked any kind of imagination and had verry littl directional focus. I found myself thinking where is this goign? more than once.
-
-
SallyP.Mar 24, 20051This movie was the most boring movie that I have ever, in my life, had to sit through. A complete watse of time.
-
-
toshiro3000May 16, 20050Are all the positive reviewers here paid employees [or, worse, unpaid interns]? let's see a show of hands. I figured as much.
-
-
DMay 24, 20050A witless and vulgar sequel.
-
-
AAMay 25, 200510EXTREMELY FUNNY. I guess peeps either love or hate this movie. I loved it. The dvd has a ton of bonus material with 19 deleted and extended scenes. Highly recommend for its fantastic cartoony imagery and funny, funny scenes.
-
-
AlPMay 28, 200510Clever, fun movie. I don't get the critics on this one at all. My kids loved this movie, and when they wanted to watch it a second time, my wife and I were more than happy to join them. A great movie for kids. We haven't seen many that are much better.
-
-
DevinB.Jun 12, 20050Irredeemably awful and brainless sequel. I would also like to speculate that the positive comments here are being posted by paid studio employees, I find it very hard to believe that real people with actual free will or the capacity to think critically could enjoy such drudgery.
-
-
WinnieJun 17, 200510I agree this is a fantastic movie for kids. Imaginative and funny. The Jim Carrey whiners here need to realize that this movie was made for kids. It is not a continuation of the first movie and isn't meant to be. It's for kids. And it's an excellent movie in that regard.
-
-
NormF.Oct 13, 20070It's not often you see a movie with all special effects and no script but this is it.
-
-
RebeccaMMar 13, 200910Surprisingly funny, fun movie. The critics are way off to me. Maybe they are hung up on the absence of Jim Carrey. If you can get past that, you might really enjoy this one.
-
-
CDMar 13, 200910
-
-
Mar 12, 20130Anybody who says ANYTHING positive about the movie CLEARLY HAVE NOT SEEN THE MOVIE!!!!
They're just trolls trying to give a positive reception. They're losers who are ruining Metacritic and the scope of human internet user knowledge.
This movie is just flat out awful from start to finish. -
Oct 30, 20101whats the purpose of this movie? it missed the presence of Jim Carrey from the original. this is by far the worst.
-
Sep 26, 20122
-
Mar 2, 20125Son of the Mask can stand out on its own, but it is pretty mean spirited. In the movie, it is hard to understand who is the real main character. Most of them act villainous at one time or another. The visuals are great and the story is okay, but not great.
-
Mar 11, 20131This is a disaster movie, i don't like it!!!!!!!!!!! The Mask with Jim Carrey was much better than this part of mask!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Nov 28, 20122I would call this movie an "overtly feverish onslaught of frivolity", but I'm afraid that after watching this movie, I'm no longer intelligent enough to use such words. Bad, bad movie.
-
20Loud, mean-spirited and generally obnoxious, Son of the Mask makes the boisterous 1994 original look downright demure and refined.
-
30The net result is a truly numbing experience.
-
40At its heart is a deep, unresolved ambivalence about child rearing.