- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 16, 2002
- Starring: Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman
- Summary:
- Director: George Lucas
- Genre(s): Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi, Fantasy
- More Details and Credits »
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 16 out of 39
-
Mixed: 18 out of 39
-
Negative: 5 out of 39
-
100Attack of the Clones celebrates a certain youthful spirit in both moviemaking and movie watching; because it's as much phenomenon as movie, audiences will either ride with or reject it. I was happy to take the ride.
-
80Clones is not a good movie -- but it is an incredibly awesome Star Wars movie! This is far from a perfect film, but the problems are almost dismissable based on the final result.
-
60You know, each and every person reading this right now will shell out their six bucks ($9-$14 in L.A./New York) to see this film no matter what I say. Hell, I feel ambivalent about it and I'm still going to pay to see it again.
-
38Watching Attack of the Clones is like getting rapped on the head with a rubber mallet -- no lasting damage (I pray and hope), but bad enough to bring on an acute bout of dizziness and disorientation. Definitely do not operate heavy machinery after viewing -- this behemoth is brutal.
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 118 out of 217
-
Mixed: 37 out of 217
-
Negative: 62 out of 217
-
10This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
-
8
-
-
George Lucas, similar to "The Phantom Menace", doesn't really give anything except for a high quality CGI battle in "Attack of the Clones".
-
Trailers
Related Articles
-
Published: August 8, 2012Can an ongoing film franchise maintain high quality over many years and multiple movies? This week's new Bourne movie only confirms how hard a task that is, though our rankings of 25 major film franchises shows that it isn't impossible.
