User Score
6.5 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 18 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 18
  3. Negative: 6 out of 18

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. MikaelP.
    Jan 5, 2004
    3
    This movie appeared as the closing film for the High Falls Film Festival in Rochester, New York, where many great small and foreign films were revealed, especially In America. This film, on the other hand, sucked us in and then spit us out, completely disappointed. Great talent does show itself in this film, but the entire experience is utterly banal, as the film has NO plot. None. It can be said that it is a documentary about a dance studio in Chicago, and some of the things that occured in the course of that studio's existence are revealed. You know what? Nobody cares about the story, because there is no plot, and the character traits and development are lost and pointless. The only draw of the film was the dancing talent that was shown, which, as I feel that anyone else in that theater can support me on, would be better seen at a REAL dance studio today. The whole experience is lost onscreen. After the film ended and we realized how pointless it was, one of the "writers" went onstage and was interviewed about the experience of writing the screenplay. She admitted that Altman had requested that no story should exist, so that is exactly what he got. Prior film interviews at the festival had brought out many questions from the audience, but very few people wanted to ask her any questions, seeing as how there was really nothing to ask about. Nothing. So folks, take it from someone who has lasted perienced its pointlessness. Ignore the critics' praise of Altmanism. This is possible the least consecquential movie of the year. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. BirKaurK.
    Jul 8, 2004
    10
    Simply exquisite!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. ItaloD.
    May 8, 2005
    9
    Great piece. Nice to see pretty faces (Campbell and Franco) doing great performances. Altman knows how filme real life. Of course, most of the goodness on this movie is due to the cut.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. JusticeT.
    Jan 15, 2004
    8
    I like Altman. I don't dance. I like to be visually entertained. I don't appreciate special effects. I like to be challenged by alternative film. I don't like to be taken advantage of as an audience member. I liked this movie more than I ever thought I would even though it went to the top of my must-see list. Impressive, interesting, and thoroughly satisfying. Sure I wanted more, but that is because I got it. Whatever you do, dismiss the negative reviews. Accept the notion that there is no plot, remember the title of the film, the director involved and what you will see on screen will entrance you. As something that is forming within the film will make you laugh, when it all comes together, you will see the art. That is this movie. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. MikaelP.
    Jan 5, 2004
    3
    This movie appeared as the closing film for the High Falls Film Festival in Rochester, New York, where many great small and foreign films were revealed, especially In America. This film, on the other hand, sucked us in and then spit us out, completely disappointed. Great talent does show itself in this film, but the entire experience is utterly banal, as the film has NO plot. None. It can be said that it is a documentary about a dance studio in Chicago, and some of the things that occured in the course of that studio's existence are revealed. You know what? Nobody cares about the story, because there is no plot, and the character traits and development are lost and pointless. The only draw of the film was the dancing talent that was shown, which, as I feel that anyone else in that theater can support me on, would be better seen at a REAL dance studio today. The whole experience is lost onscreen. After the film ended and we realized how pointless it was, one of the "writers" went onstage and was interviewed about the experience of writing the screenplay. She admitted that Altman had requested that no story should exist, so that is exactly what he got. Prior film interviews at the festival had brought out many questions from the audience, but very few people wanted to ask her any questions, seeing as how there was really nothing to ask about. Nothing. So folks, take it from someone who has lasted perienced its pointlessness. Ignore the critics' praise of Altmanism. This is possible the least consecquential movie of the year. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. Elliott
    Jan 6, 2004
    10
    An unbelievably beautiful film, easily the best thing Altman has done in over a decade... Certainly better than Gosford Park, which, sadly, was better received by the critics. Neve Campbell is truly astonishing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. CannonF.
    Feb 7, 2004
    7
    Beautiful but a bit too long and the ending is very poor.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. HelenS.
    Apr 10, 2006
    2
    Can I say BORING? I just rented this and fell asleep 20 minutes into it. There is no story line, no character development and some of the choreography looks like it's making fun of ballet. Neve Campbell is non-existent and has barely any lines. What is the point of this movie?
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  9. JoeStuff
    Feb 12, 2004
    3
    First off, the dancing looks great in this film. Instead of just showing the production numbers from standard angles, Altman really let's us weave in and out of the dancers...it makes you feel very close to the action and very real. Too bad that the rest of the movie is left to be so 'real' as well. Aside from the dance, the whole movie is so QUIET! The scenes between the dances seem badly improved by non-actors (they are). The whole movie was just awkward. 80 minutes in I'm thinking that I just want to leave (which I never do) and how I wish the movie would just end. Suddenly, the film started to rattle and it MELTED right in front of my eyes. True story. So yes, I've never seen the ending with the whole Blue Snake dance but the 80 minutes I saw had some good dance and horrible filler in-between. There's something to be said for movies with no plot...the same can't be said for movies with no point. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. Marcus
    Mar 21, 2004
    8
    Altman's status as an auteur is solidified here. Whether accomplishing that without a real storyline makes the movie a greater or lesser work of art is up for debate. The Company remains an excellent film and anyone half-willing to see a documentary will appreciate it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. Marg
    Nov 28, 2005
    0
    Worst movie I've ever seen actually. NOTHING happens. Nothing. At all.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. JoshC
    Nov 19, 2006
    0
    Robert Altman has been plugging away on movie sets, manufacturing adroit classics, odious train wrecks, and—most often—ambitious mediocrities for more than five decades. Virtually every gracious label our culture has for individualists has been garlanded upon him at one point or another. But it may be his dogged prolificness that makes him so unreliable. Too easily inspired, too repetitive, and too seduced by sophomoric ideas, Altman would seem to rather make a crummy movie than make no movie at all. The Company, his 36th feature (not counting a slew of TV movies and miniseries), is Altman-doing-ballet, just as he's done war hospitals, country music, health faddism, Yankee family rites, fashion, jazz, and Brit class combat. All of the familiar Altman tools—overheard dialogue, distracted zooms, multi-plane character clutter, persona thumbnailing—are out on the table, but his sardonic tone (which has varied from razor-sharp to rubber-chicken-ish) is not. The entire contraption assembled to please the ego of Neve Campbell. Altman didn't (or couldn't) trick out the rest of the film as he often does with colorful cameos, but the anemic script hungers for a hectic Rene Auberjonois or Bob Balaban walk-on. Containing little we haven't seen in dozens of behind-the-tutu documentaries, the scenes of rehearsal and choreographic tweaking can nonetheless be interesting in a working-reality manner, but The Company provides no connective tissue. The rigors of practice, the toll on body and soul—not on the radar. There's not only no drama, there are no situations. Everything on the screen is rote and empty. This film proves that Altman is the most overrated American filmmaker of the last 35 years. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 32 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 32
  2. Negative: 0 out of 32
  1. A wonderfully vivid and engaging theatrical experience.
  2. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    80
    Robert Altman takes an elegant, appealingly unemphatic look at the world of ballet.
  3. A funny valentine by an old master, woos us into the dance.