User Score
8.0 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 209 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 22 out of 209

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Oct 1, 2011
    10
    The best horror movie ever !
  2. HarryP.
    Aug 9, 2006
    10
    The first genuinely scary - and I mean scary - movie in more than a decade. Take Pampers.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. MichaelL.
    Aug 5, 2006
    9
    Scariest film I've seen in a long while. Yes, it's derivative, and yes, it's flawed. But, it's well acted, well directed, and creepy as hell. Personally, I feel the gore factor got a bit absurd near the end--excess is not always a good thing. It became desensitizing. But all in all, a welcome relief from Japanese-based "poor little girl was mistreated by her Mommy so now she's back to kill everyone" tedium. Let's hear it for strong women. And endings that aren't Hollywood happy. (My knees are still shaking...) Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. KevinE.
    Apr 21, 2006
    9
    the strongest creature feature in years, good acting, well directed, excellent cinematography, makes a fool out of the cave. If this is your kind of movie, it's a must see.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. RikJ.
    Jul 28, 2006
    9
    Great horror flick ! I had no clue for the first 45 minutes that it was anything but a well-done indie drama about loss and bonding. Man, was I wrong! Very well directed, shot and lit. Hope it comes to the US so I can see it on the big screen!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. ScotM.
    Aug 4, 2006
    5
    The side story and so called "twist" are both lame and meaningless,as is the final scene. I've seen the same creatures on a much more enjoyable episode of the "X- Files", and people simply would not engage in dialog or act in the manner depicted if ever presented with this type of incredible situation. The movie is nothing like the seventies classic "Deliverance" which was mentioned somewhere in another review here, and I am amazed at the relatively high scores for this tiresome flick. Also the voice of one of the 6 actors is the scariest thing in the film, sharp enough to cut right thought you. All in all I've seen it many times before. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. RobertI.
    Aug 5, 2006
    8
    What a perfect premise for a horror film--the claustrophobic passages of an uncharted cave. Ironically, the shock value diminishes when the creatures appear: nothing beats the nerve-jangling apprehension of the dark and slimey unknown. An shrieking, instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. SuhnA.
    Aug 6, 2006
    4
    What a horrible movie. It was merely a bloodfest with no real plot and no outcome. There was no creation of fear. There were some mildly startling moments, but overall it was a yawn. The acting was horrible as well. Simply an unentertaining movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. NedA.
    Aug 7, 2006
    4
    To be quite honest, the only frightening moments of this movie were the constant jump-out shots featuring the rather unremarkably lumpy creatures; and even then, as the movie dragged on the constant attempts to make you jump became more than predictable. The gore was laughable at points, and generally unnecessary throughout the entire film. Also, much of the important suppositions in the plot completely dissolve once the slightest amount of thought is given to them. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. PatrickB.
    Aug 7, 2006
    6
    I didn't think this film deserved the hype it received. It's a good film, just not as good as those it was compared to (Aliens? Please.) But if you like thrillers with attractive women, it might be up your alley.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. Mase
    Aug 9, 2006
    10
    Not only one of the best horror movies of the last 10 years but one of the best movies of the year!! Truly gets everything right, chills, gore, acting, suspense. A movie fan especially a horror movie fan couldnt ask for more. Most importantly we get strong female characters you actually care about which makes what happens all the more horrifying!! GO SEE!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. SomeoneElse
    Aug 9, 2006
    8
    Definitely one of the best horror films I have seen in a long time. Genuinely dense and claustrophobic, well acted, splendidly shot. I liked the endng, because in my opinion it was the only reasonable possibility. Being trapped in an uncharted cave system, not knowing where the exit is, 'low on light' and being hunted by creatures that (as one of the characters claims in the film) are perfectly adapted to underground life and greatly outnumber the lovely ladies, any other ending would have seemed contrived. I saw the european version of the film, but I understand the ending was somewhat 'altered' for release in north america. Pity, but that shouldn't hold anyone back from enjoying the descent. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. IanReyP
    Apr 9, 2008
    10
    Anybody who does not like this movie will never like any horror movie at all! It's just one of the best horror movies done! A simple story but very innovative idea!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. M
    May 29, 2008
    7
    It was a very solid horror film. Little corny with monsters, but intensity pacing was far superior to most recent horror films. It's a mix of Shining, Aliens, and Deliverance.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. KorayD.
    Feb 6, 2009
    8
    If you want to experience real clousthrophobic terror this is a really good film. I am still feeling repressed as I am writing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. OliverD.
    Jun 15, 2006
    9
    Most effective horror movie in years! Neil Marshall does a brilliant job delivering on almost all human primal fears. Razor sharp technique and earie set design paared with good acting and frightening sound effects make for the most frightening movie I have seen in many years.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. RobertK.
    Jun 20, 2006
    10
    The best horror movie in a long, long time, and especially for 2005/2006. You don't want to miss this one, especially if you can see it in the theaters.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. JoeC.
    Jun 23, 2006
    9
    Relentless. Grim. The best horror movie of the last 15 years.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. RachelR.
    Jul 21, 2006
    10
    Saw this film at the LA Film Festival and actually levitated out of my seat. I think the screams from the audience could have been heard all the way to San Francisco. I'm not usually a fan of horror movies, but this is the best movie I've seen all year.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. SamS.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Brilliant and terryfying. Great plot, suspenceful until the last twist. Excellent classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. SashaO.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    I left this movie crying and trebling. I must say i was truely disturbed and effected. I would not recomend seeing it. I have sat through most horror films without a twitch, always knowing what to expect and almost NEVER getting scared. But this time, the suprises were endless and the horror was so real that i wet myself. It makes the Texas Chainsaw Massacure look like Barney and The Ring look like Peter Pan. The scariest movie of all time. More so then the Evil Dead. Absoultly terrifying. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. BobB.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    I had my eyes closed half of the movie. Absolusly terryifying. Perfect beggining. Amazing ending. I would see it 100 times more.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. BittyR.
    Jul 30, 2006
    10
    Supurb acting and amazing horror. great twists and great director. well done, well lit and really smart plot. instant classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. ChadS.
    Aug 14, 2006
    7
    Like Lars Von Trier's "Dancer in the Dark" and Thomas Vinerberg's "Dear Wendy", a European location substitutes for an American one. In this case, Scotland plays the part of the Appalachian Mountains. Those films were criticisms of America, and early in "The Descent", the woman who controls the car radio, passes on banjo music and makes a dismissive remark about Christianity. Like the Dogma filmmakers, "The Descent" uses a few laughably slight signifiers to normalize its surroundings. If you consider this film was made in the UK and everybody is in a bloody uproar about Tony Blair's involvment with President George W. Bush, isn't it interesting that it's the American character who gets everybody killed. Like the remake of "The Hills Have Eyes", this seemingly escapist romp in the woods has a biting political subtext. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. RichE.
    Aug 16, 2006
    5
    [***SPOILERS***] For me, it's a mixed bag. I liked the closed, claustrophobic effect (personally, I hate being in that situation, but I liked seeing it on the screen). It added to the tension and horror of the film and helped set things up well. The movie did have it's shocking moments and handled that well. And, in general, I could understand the characters' motivations in their situation and how their attitude changes occurred. On the other side, I didn't get how the tragedy that occurred in the beginning applied to rest of the movie. Why couldn't the movie just have started with the women taking a trip to Appalacia to have an adventure caving? And more needed to be developed in the relationship between the two main characters, Sarah and Juno, to have the events of the latter part of the movie make more of an impact. And yes, the cave monsters are Gollum X 1000, which we've seen before. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. JoeAverage
    Aug 19, 2006
    8
    If you found the ending to be contrived and rushed, you owe it to yourself to search 'descent uk ending' on the web. Yes, I detested the ending, mainly because I thought the rest of the flick was well crafted. Playful and multi-layered take on the conventional 'guy's-road-trip-gone-bad' premise. BTW If you felt the US release had a satisfying ending, don't bother with the UK ending (you'll probably hate it). Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. P.O.
    Aug 20, 2006
    2
    A tense, claustrophobic, and utterly foolish film. The film is legitimately scary the second time you find the monsters but after that the entire thing falls apart. All of a sudden the cave floor becomes utterly flat with wide open spaces - so the characters can run around in fear a bit more comfortably I suppose. Don't get me started on the monsters explanation as it insults the concept of suspension of disbelief. The moral of it is both offensive (although less so in the British release as it has an additional minute or so but still awful) and upsetting. You are supposed to hate the only heroic figure in the entire film and you are ultimately horrified by the intended figure of sympathy. Also, what happened to clever british scripting? What happened to sharp dialogue and witty give and take? Why does every piece of dialogue in a british film or television (see Hex for a perfect example) show, post- trainspotting, have to sound like my junior high school locker room? Nothing but cursing, crudeness, and lame booze and sex jokes. Guess what? It's not shocking or edgy, this isn't 1950. It's just pathetic. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. Marilyn
    Aug 23, 2006
    5
    Although I am not castrophobic, I'm also not wild about caves so just having a bunch of women go into a largely unexplored cave was unnerving itself. The cave in & being lost was sufficient enough for a horror movie, but it did turn into one of the bloodiest movies I've ever seen. It quite scared me half to death and I was so glad to have it over.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. ColinM.
    Aug 25, 2006
    10
    Easily the best horror movie in many years. Very interesting dynamics between the characters and some truly frightening sequences that combine four primal human fears: heights, enclosed spaces, monsters, and the dark. Highly recommended.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. DustParticles
    Aug 27, 2006
    0
    this is one of the most boring movies i've ever seen it irritates me that it has gained so much praise the first 20 minutes are good as soon as the monsters are shown, it's pretty awful.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. DirkA.
    Aug 5, 2006
    8
    The Descent is solid 70's style horror filmmaking at its finest and though not the Alien 2006 its ads make it out to be, it is easily the best horror film of the year.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. DrewF.
    Aug 5, 2006
    9
    Tremendous horror effort. One of the best films i've seen this year PERIOD. The altered ending doesn't change THAT much (both endings are [spoiler omitted] in my opinion), but i do slightly prefer the original ending. Brings everything full-circle.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. DaveB.
    Aug 6, 2006
    10
    Scary as hell. This movie makes Saw 2 and The Hills Have Eyes (newer version) look like Captain Kangaroo. Honestly very chilling and extremely gory. Anybody that compares this movie to The Cave (worst movie I've seen lately) needs their head examined. If you are a fan of horror movies go see this flick....an awesome feast of blood and gore.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  44. KellyA.
    Aug 7, 2006
    10
    Loved it. I'd heard from friends who had gone to see it on friday that it was scary as hell, and they were right! Great to see a horror film with strong, capable women who can act.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  45. JoshW.
    Aug 7, 2006
    10
    This movie did it all right. It's really rare that a horror movie delivers great scares, let alone great cinematography, acting, story, etc..
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. LynnO.
    Aug 7, 2006
    4
    How can people who get paid to review movies possibly think this will be a "classic"? Has the standard dropped that low? Just having something jump out of a dark corner does not constitute a horror classic. That's called cheap Hollywood theatrics. I give them some credi for having an interesting premise. Five years from now, no one will remember this "classic".
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  47. Ross
    Aug 7, 2006
    9
    This movie acheives sustained tension, and is extremely convincing. Even BEFORE the creatures of the latter half of this movie appeared, it kept me on the edge of my seat. More a "survival thriller" than a horror movie, this was certainly well made. Check it out if you like this genre.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  48. FrankN.S.
    Aug 7, 2006
    8
    The Descent had a fistful of great scares and some amazing directing. I found that it actually had a lot of strengths. I agree with several of the critics that the first half of the movie was the strongest. The acting and cinematography was fantastic, and there was so much psychological tension that it almost made the monster attack feel like kind of a dumbing-down. I hate to say it, because as mentioned before, this movie got SO many things right that the majority of horror movies get wrong. I would still recommend it, for sure, but no, it is not as classic as Alien, and I still feel as though the plot could have been much more interesting near the end. The attack scenes got a bit repetitive. Last but not least, it discourages me to think that it is getting put in the same range as Saw and Hostel. Saw was for 12 year olds and Hostel was a try hard. The Descent deserves better. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. RobE
    Sep 13, 2006
    10
    The horror / chiller genre is my favorite, and although I am no so called 'expert' I do like to think I know when I have seen a good movie and not just a scary one. When I first started to watch this film I thought it was just going to be another usual run of the mill horror/chase film. I was so, so wrong. This has to be one if not the best horror I have seen ever. Very, very few films get me jumping in any way but this one did, that is one sign a horror has worked. Secondly it was not mindless. The character set up in the film was first class. Ok it was probably no 'Oscar' performance, but for a horror? It was the best you will see in many horror films. You actually felt something for the characters and wanted them to get to safety which is not always the case in a horror. Yes, I did hear the US ending to the film was rubbish, so I am glad I live in the UK. If you’re unsure whether to buy this film, I promise, you won’t hate it. But you may just love it. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  50. BobbyE.
    Jan 18, 2007
    7
    I can't remember the last time I was actually genuinely frightened by a scene that made me really jump in a movie. If you have seen this movie you know what I'm talking about and the scene a little before was as tough to watch as anything I've ever watched. Not a great movie but definitely worth while and I suggest you check it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  51. MiguelL.
    Jan 28, 2007
    8
    This was a good thriller with a plot line that kept me on my toes. The acting was good and the cast fit well with one another. Overall, a great "don't-watch-this-alone" movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  52. Riren
    Jan 6, 2007
    8
    Hey its not as good as the classic horror movies such as the Excorcist, The Thing, and Alien but it is a very good jump out of your seat fun. The begining of the movie made it very suspensful and the violence was pretty gruesome but the only thing that kept this movie at a 8 was because the monsters could have been a little creepier and scarier but other than that best horror flick 2006.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  53. DaveE
    Feb 18, 2007
    8
    Great, great, great. Best horror flick I've seen in 15 years. If you know what a good movie is, ignore all negative reviews of this flick. Those writers obvious idiots.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. D.A.
    Feb 20, 2007
    2
    Yes if I could have just seen anything other than a torch shining in my eyes it may have been ok. gollum was cute though. and what is an apparently satisfying film if it has an unsatisfying ending? no not big clever or make your own mind up, i paid for you to tell me a story not make it up myself, it ends up changing my opinion from ok to UNSATISFYING. All directors stop trying to be clever and ambigous its just a cheap horror finish off your work. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  55. RD.
    Mar 25, 2007
    9
    Very good horror. Such a horror movie comes only once ina few years.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  56. ND.
    Apr 1, 2007
    8
    Far better than I expected (hadnt read any reviews when we rented it out) - plenty of jumpy bits( girlfriend almost went through the roof when we first see the creature lol). Worth watching if you like gory chillers.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  57. ZS
    Jan 2, 2008
    5
    Eh, it wasn't bad at all. But it certainly wasn't all the critics made it out to be. Jumpy, sure (and it did this well...for the first hour or so...), but then it just devolves into one fight after another. And by the way...are Sarah and Juno Cave Tai Kwon Do experts or something? The Gollum ass-kicking got old quickly. They can't even walk forward without scraping against something for the first hour, and then suddenly there are whole underground fighting chambers? I didn't buy that. Great performance from most of the cast (Juno was overacted), decent concept, yet another ambiguous is-she-or-isn't-she Hollywoodesque ending. I would have felt more fulfilled if that logging truck had just taken Sarah's head off right after she blew cookies. That would have been as merciless and grim as this was supposed to be. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  58. ClifC.
    Mar 9, 2009
    7
    What is interesting is how characters react when they are confronted to fear itself. The plot is well constructed and the last scene is mentally shocking. Some special effects (with the camera) are weird and almost unwatchable, and the acting is not good.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  59. ScottN
    Jun 7, 2009
    9
    Definitely one of the more effectively-creep horror movies to come out in the theatres in the past several years IMO. In fact, I think this movie could have been just as scary (or even moreso) without the blind, flesh-eating creatures. The first 45 minutes of the movie before the creatures start showing up will really get you going, especially for any of you clostrophobes out there. To me, the simple situation of finding yourselves in a cave system and not knowing if you will be able to ever find your way out is even scarier than when the blood and gore starts to flow.. But regardless, a very well done movie that is sure to give you the willies. My only complaint is about the so cliche "fooled ya!" type of ending that has been so over done.. Either let the girl escape or don't, but don't do the old "ok, that didn't really happen" thing. Please. But that didn't ruin the movie - I still highly recommend watching it at least once. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  60. SteveG
    Nov 29, 2005
    9
    Great stuff. Claustraphobic, tense and dark horror....and thats even before it kicks in as a horror film. Unknown cast excell and add to the unpredictability of the whole film. Lit only by the headlamps and glowsticks this really creates genuine shocks and one stand out jump that had me splilling my popcorn.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  61. ChristianC.
    Dec 14, 2005
    10
    Easily the best horror movie of 2005 and the best British movie since Shaun Of The Dead. Scarier and darker than anything produced by the US in over a decade. Hollywood take note - this is how horror should be.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  62. Ken-StianP.
    Dec 2, 2005
    9
    Bloody brilliant! Excuse the pun. But this film had me shivering from the get-go. Good job, Mr. Marshall!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  63. JonathanB
    Dec 8, 2005
    9
    Scary, dark and tightly scripted. There's surprises, twists and some truly nasty horror moments. Another great film from brit director Neil Marshall.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  64. charlyp
    Dec 9, 2005
    9
    Magnifico ejercicio de estilo y de terror claustrofóbico. Filmada con excelente pulso y bien interpretada. Abstengase gente impresionable...asusta de verdad y no se corta con las secuencias violentas. Un festín para cualquier amante del buen cine de terror....algunos deberían aprender y saber que es lo que nunca debieron hacer el último verano.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  65. halb
    Dec 29, 2006
    7
    A very good horror film; not great, but very effective. A descent into horror and a descent into madness. As other reviewers have noted, you DO get to know and care about some of the characters (at least more than your average horror flick). And there are at least a good 6 or 7 jump-from-your-seat moments! The ending has a nice, nasty little twist to it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  66. MilesM.
    Oct 8, 2006
    0
    Pitifully boring, tragically trite...Neil Marshall disappoints with this one-dimensional estrogen-fest
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  67. TobiasO.
    Mar 3, 2006
    8
    Well done British thriller. I've read that Lions Gate will be changing the ending for the US release. What else is new? American studios don't have the courage to make films like this without some gimmicky"let's treat everyone like their 8 years old" jump-scare ending. But isn't it nice to know the original British ending will be "an extra" on the US dvd release. Marketing at its finest! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  68. F.Valeron
    Apr 16, 2006
    4
    There's no need to avoid this film if you have a heart problem or nervous disposition, only if you think films should actually be good. It's just a gang of weird, blind monsters chasing girls around a cave. Sort of like a night out in an English nightclub.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  69. BértilR.
    May 26, 2006
    10
    The best horror movie I've seen in many years, its really does his works.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  70. JoeM.
    Jun 18, 2006
    8
    How unusual to watch a horror film that actually delivers. Great camerawork, editing, acting and sound plus just the right amount of grand guignol in the final act. Plus a hauntingly downbeat ending. Marshall's the man.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  71. Jake
    Jul 19, 2006
    8
    The first 2/3 of the movie are brilliant as the suspense slowly builds. The pacing is great and it really lets you absorb the "scenery." Unfortunately, once it is revealed what exactly lurks in the cave, the film loses steam, and what wants to be an intense climax seems somewhat rushed. Has it's fair share of scary moments, but it's kind of a one trick pony. I guess there's only so much you could do in a cave. Fortunately the ending is so great it made me forget about most of the flaws. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  72. EdwinR.
    Jul 27, 2006
    1
    I saw this movie last night in Miami Beach!. However prior to the moving starting there was a 15 minute behind the scenes look into the movie. It really ruined the plot, and i knew exactly what to expect. While it was scary, the plot has been done before and not too long ago. It is unoriginal and could almost be a lower budget version of a recent movie that takes place in a Cave.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  73. MRPT
    Jul 29, 2006
    8
    This is an old movie not new this year, unless its getting re-released or something. Anyway its well worth watching. The paranoia of the women and the claustrophobia of the caves is captured well. The tension that builds keeps you peering through the darkness to see what’s behind them. It’s a tension that’s taught until the end of the movie, albeit a bit of a disappointing end.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  74. MarkS.
    Aug 1, 2006
    10
    Easily the best horror film of 2005. Potentially the best horror film of the last 10 years. Anyone who compares it to The Cave needs to be sectioned. This is superior fare.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  75. Roquentin
    Aug 11, 2006
    5
    Nice cinematography and music, but the combination of dimly-lit scenes, muddy faces, and an excess of quick-cut editing made it difficult to follow the action or the characters. It's a lesser film without the original British ending, which adds depth and resonance. I was hardly bored in the film, and it's better than most horror offerings these days, but this film has been overhyped.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  76. BobW.
    Aug 12, 2006
    9
    The claustrophobics will be fine by the second half but those with weak stomachs or hearts may not.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  77. Marquis
    Aug 12, 2006
    10
    scared the .... out of me! I think my niece will have nightmares for the next two weeks now.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  78. JohnB.
    Aug 13, 2006
    10
    Having 6 female characters and not one guy join them is a very daring move that I really appreciated in this movie. It proves to me that you don't need a tough guy in the film to bring all the action, adventure, and violence of a good horror flick. The movie did all the right things and rarely bored you. The Descent is as daring a movie in its originality as it is an old school thriller that keeps to a good standard for the horror fans. The first truly thrilling and scary movie I have seen. It is definitely worth seeing and is recommended to see on the big screen compared to a rental. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  79. GerronK.
    Aug 16, 2006
    8
    "The Descent" is the most horrifying, chilling, enchanting and tastefully gory movie to come about in years. Not only does it prey on our fears from the things in the cave, but it does so by presenting scenes in total darkness. The movie is surprisingly restrained, but it's dark ending makes up for that. I enjoyed this movie a whole lot.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  80. BooBerry
    Aug 24, 2006
    8
    This movie is scary. There are some plot holes for those that can't suspend disbelief, but that is very minor compared to the overall emotion and fear this movie will create at times. The unique thing about this movie is unlike the horror movies of the 70s and 80s, these girls aren't exactly helpless damsels. That also is what makes it emotional because their heroics, for most, will be in vain. The creatures at first are horrifying, but near the end I found them becoming "video gamed" up. The girls could meet one challenge so now we give you two creatures...then more...it took away from the movies better scenes of girl vs. the unknown in the dark. I guess the best sign that this movie was good, was that I was glad it was over and secretly felt I had to get on the internet just to see the actors were ok because you feel close to the characters they played. Good fun, those that are afraid of caves may hate the panic attack moments in this movie though. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  81. PaulK.
    Aug 3, 2006
    5
    I had high expectations after seeing the user rating on here, but I didn't think this was scary at all...granted there was one perfectly placed and unsuspecting scare, but that's it. Most parts of the plot were too far over the top and I kept getting confused between the characters since they look similar and half the time you couldn't see them. The last second of the movie is ridiculous. Oh, and the gore factor is relatively high, in case you were wondering...makes me curious about the original ending that was changed for audiences here in the states. Horror fans will see this in the theater, but everyone else should wait until video. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  82. [Anonymous]
    Aug 3, 2006
    10
    Classic artwork...brilliant like no other horor film of the past 20 years. Absolutely breathtaking.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  83. AlL
    Aug 4, 2006
    4
    It is distinguished from a crowded genre by the mere fact that the set up is so prolonged. Okay white girls we get it: this is not "sex in the city" but and low budget Steel Magnolia's. If I wanted to go spelunking I would go for real. Claustraphobia anyone. Once the familiar looking ghouls arrive it is the same old formula. As for Sasha O and hercrying, trembling and peeing of her/his panties...nice try. I saw your name on Lion Gate's website. How much did you get paid??? Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  84. DorsetJD
    Aug 7, 2006
    9
    Great pace - not too dark - watch -enjoy - jump !
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  85. MarkB.
    Aug 8, 2006
    8
    Part of what makes watching horror movies, good or bad, with an audience so much fun is occasionally getting to hear some of them talk to the characters onscreen, usually offering such tips as "Don't go in there/ out there/ up there!!" or some variation. The Descent definitely qualifies as the ultimate "Don't go DOWN there!!" movie. Six outdoorswomen, including one who survived an astonishing tragedy and another who's quite reminiscent of a distaff Burt Reynolds from Deliverance, only even more unduly cocky and wrongheaded, explore an unknown cave and find that being trapped inside it constitutes the LEAST of their troubles. Writer/ director Neil Marshall (Dog Soldiers, and absolutely no relation to Pretty Woman's Garry M.) has come up with an instant genre classic that's relatively light on explicit gore (at least by 2006 R-rated horror movie standards), replacing some of it with great use of naturalistic underground light sources (or their lack thereof) to really ramp up the tension; it's a testament to Marshall's confidence and skill that even though you don't always see everything that's happening onscreen, you're amazingly never in doubt as to what's going on. Marshall is an excellent student of the horror genre, expertly weaving together visual and audio cues, themes and motifs familiar to fans of Alien, Predator, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Final Destination and even Carrie while still making a genuine original. My one cavil with Marshall is that of the six spelunkers, only Sarah and Juno come across as well-developed characters; the other four serve, more or less, as potential raw meat. If Marshall has been studying the work of George A. Romero, who always took the trouble to individualize even the zombie victims with the least amount of screen time in his Living Dead quadrology, then it's time to take a few more lessons! Nevertheless, The Descent is otherwise a smart, sweaty, scary and intensely suspenseful little gem in which Marshall even compensates for the Britishness of his characters and cast (even though the movie mostly takes place in the Appalachian mountains) by making their differing driving habits a subtle part of the plot, and he cleverly turns the potentially cliched final minute into something that can actually be interpreted two different ways! Most of all, though, The Descent proves beyond question why camping, hiking, rafting or other outdoor expeditions are best left to Reynolds and Jon Voight in Deliverance, Keith Carradine and Powers Boothe in Southern Comfort, Joe Pesci and Danny Glover in Gone Fishin'...in short, anybody and everybody but me! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  86. J.reb
    Aug 8, 2006
    3
    Uhh...what a disappointment. Im a true horror movie fan but any sense of fear turned to humour and then bordom once you discover that the creatures look like golom from LOTR... This movie also has one of the craziest, most jarring cameras ever and gore scenes dont last longer than half a second because of it. Overall...boring characters, boring monsters, boring setting = boring movie. Only part that I liked was the car in the beginning. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  87. JLight
    Aug 9, 2006
    9
    [***SPOILER***] I don't see how true horror fans couldn't get anything but a thrill out of this movie. Someone mentioned that the camera work is jarring and that the gore doesn't last long. It's this "jarring" and fleeting image work that makes this film riveting. Besides, I don't need to see the creatures devouring someone's stomach while they are still alive for 20 seconds. The creatures MAY resemble Golum in some way but, really, they don't. What you have here is a well-acted, well-constructed, well-executed horror film. Strongly atmospheric with several phenomenal scares that even caught me, and I consider myself a pretty stalwart guy, by surprise. It's truly a must see...ESPECIALLY in theaters. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  88. Rashid
    Sep 19, 2006
    9
    I enjoyed it so much. I am the fan of horror films but I was disappointed because in recent year no horror film could make me feel frightened until I saw this movie last month.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  89. AnneN.
    Dec 6, 2007
    9
    brilliant and original film, bit of a crap ending though
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  90. NickB
    Feb 13, 2007
    9
    Unexpectedly good film, I had been told by others to check it out without knowing anything of the premise. I watched the unrated director's cut, which definitely pulled no punches. Fans of H.P. Lovecraft in cinema take note: while this is not a Lovecraft film per se, it easily fits all tropes and elements of the genre. As for me, as a jaded horror fan, it's nice to run across a movie that made me jump out of my skin about ten times during the movie. Very hard to do to me anymore! I look forward to more work from this director. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  91. lf
    Apr 30, 2007
    3
    Excellent beginning falls prey to cheap shock and brainless scripting. So much talent and energy wasted by brainless Hollywood scare tactics.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  92. WilliamY.
    Jul 8, 2008
    3
    Good movie all the way through, falls victim to many of the usual horror/thriller movie mistakes cept the ending was horse s**t... Does it mean they all die? Why was she such a b***h to that one woman? I mean when it comes down to survival, one person isn't thinking about revenge, they are thinking "how can I save my own buttox" I really think she had a bit more of a heart... Personally, Not my cup of tea. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  93. CoryH
    Dec 26, 2006
    10
    This is my definition of a horror flick. It gives you time to care about the characters. It gives you time to care about their situation. It makes you want to know what's going to happen next. I see a lot of negative reviews from people that find the opening hour boring. I'll be these are the same people that LOVE The Thing, The Exorcist, or Alien. In all three of the above mentioned movies, nothing REALLY scary happens for a good half hour to forty five minutes. Why? BECAUSE THE BACKDROP HAS TO BE SET TO SCARE THE HELL OUT OF YOU!!!!!!!!!!! This movie is fantastic and should be viewed by any horror fan. Hands down. Next question please. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  94. DanielK.
    Feb 12, 2006
    10
    Der beste Horrorfilm seit langer Zeit, ohne Teenager und ohne Happy End. Gott sei Dank bin ich nicht klaustrophobisch, diese Enge würde mich sonst verrückt machen. Kann diesen Film jedem Horror-Fan empfehlen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  95. PabloF.
    Jul 26, 2006
    9
    It's one of the best pictures of horror that i can see in a long time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  96. ClintM.
    Aug 15, 2006
    9
    completely horrifying to me ... you feel the suffocation the cavers experience early on in the movie and then the crazy crawlers start coming out and the rest is basically you holding your breath until the final scene.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  97. Filmfan
    Aug 26, 2006
    3
    This movie is a real bore. A few slimy looking characters attack improbably pretty gurl jocks in dark cave situations. There are much more scary or more funny films in ths genre.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  98. MattB.
    Jan 14, 2007
    0
    Heard a lot good stuff about it, I was excited to see it but it was a as scary as an RL Stine book for kids, the crash at the beginning meant nothing, it was a big letdown, the female bonding didn't work either, instead of monsters they could of had real drama with some good claustrophobia.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  99. MattR.
    Jan 15, 2007
    9
    "Thrillingly terrific and terrifying" would be the phrase that immediately comes to mind when I think of "The Descent", Neil Marshall's horror masterpiece. Never have I viewed such a claustrophobic film, where my heart is literally beating out of my chest at the mere sight of a tunnel.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  100. NickM.
    May 27, 2007
    1
    I was very disappointed by this movie. The first half of the movie was extremely dull.....the second half was a random killing spree.....and the ending left something to be desired.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 30 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 30
  2. Negative: 0 out of 30
  1. Reviewed by: Dan Jolin
    80
    Brutal, bloody, terrifying, astonishing... And so tense it'll leave you aching. The most significant Brit chiller since "28 Days Later."
  2. Reviewed by: Derek Elley
    70
    The chills and spills keep comin' to agreeable effect in Brit-made scarefest The Descent.
  3. Reviewed by: Jeremy Knox
    70
    All in all, this is an accessible art house horror film whose trailer and premise do not do justice to the end result.