The Exorcism of Emily Rose

Metascore
46

Mixed or average reviews - based on 32 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 32
  2. Negative: 7 out of 32

Where To Watch

Stream On
Stream On
Stream On

Critic Reviews

  1. 60
    Could have been both a gripping courtroom drama and a chilling "is she or isn’t she?" horror tale. What we have instead is a movie that drifts, almost unmanned, from plot point to plot point.
  2. Reviewed by: Olly Richards
    60
    Ror all its cleverness, Emily Rose does have its hokey moments.
  3. It's a pretense of even-handedness. The true story has been reduced to a case for faith. It merely sacrifices all reason to get there.
  4. 50
    Part courtroom drama, part otherworldly shocker, the film basically restages the Scopes Monkey Trial and comes out once more against Mr. Darrow, and it's got the spine-twisting, tongues-speaking, devil-channeling hellion to prove it.
  5. Derrickson's characters are reduced to ciphers in a theological debate. Long wedges of the film are simply a discussion about the relative merits of science and superstition. Carpenter, as the sick girl, puts in the best performance.
  6. It's hard to get riled up one way or the other by a film about an exorcist who is forced, cruelly and relentlessly, to introduce one flashback after another.
  7. While not especially good - judged strictly on its cinematic merits, it ranges from O.K. to god-awful - it is still a fascinating cultural document in the age of intelligent design.
  8. 50
    Muddled tale of faith and reason.
  9. 50
    The script is a lifeless succession of attorney-client debates and stormy horror flashbacks, though I had a good time watching Jennifer Carpenter, a comic Buffy type in "White Chicks" and "D.E.B.S.," hurl herself around as the title character.
  10. 50
    This windy courtroom drama is punctuated by cheesy flashbacks.
  11. 50
    Allegedly it's based on a true story, which is believable only because the outcome is so unsatisfying it carries the dull metallic tang of real-life ambiguity. And that's neither scary nor stimulating.
  12. Positively hops with jolts and frights but they're the cheap kind.
  13. I'm all for hearty theological debate. But this is intellectual suicide. Even worse, it's boring intellectual suicide.
  14. Derrickson's flick can sour your stomach with piety, which is a shame -- its moments of jolt wattage rate with many J-horrors.
  15. 40
    Creepy enough at first, this relatively gore-free film gradually becomes a stifling talk-fest in which superb actors drone on for so long about the nature of belief that one longs for a juror to spew a little pea soup.
  16. Simultaneously sober and silly horror picture.
User Score
6.7

Generally favorable reviews- based on 106 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 37 out of 55
  2. Negative: 10 out of 55
  1. ChristopherW.
    Jan 16, 2007
    4
    As much as I had hoped this story would captivate me, I simply never found the film adequately engaging. Most of the plot is conveyed through As much as I had hoped this story would captivate me, I simply never found the film adequately engaging. Most of the plot is conveyed through flashbacks that are distressingly deviant in tone and purpose from the present day scenes set in a courtroom. If the audience is meant to question the forces of evil that may exist in the world or is asked to feel sympathy and compassion for Emily's fate, we are never given a real sense of why any of this really matters. I fully dismiss all supernatural explanations, but I am still intrigued by the notion that there are people who don't. Emily Rose ultimately fails to meaningfully connect to its audience because the screenplay is never quite sure what it wants to do. Is it fright film? Is it allegory? Is it a tale of mental illness? Is it a tale of demonic possession? Is it a courtroom battle between reason and faith? Maybe the film is all of these things. Unfortunately all of these ambiguous angles eventually steal each other's thunder. The film is too cluttered with ideas, but the performances are no less than adequate. In any case, Emily Rose is a mixed bag. Proceed with caution! Full Review »
  2. DonP.
    Sep 12, 2005
    8
    This film was far better than the reviews made it out to be - I agree with the Chronicle's review "a thinking man's horror film". This film was far better than the reviews made it out to be - I agree with the Chronicle's review "a thinking man's horror film". I'm a huge Laura Linney fan and thought she was fabulous. I was sucked in, and much more scared and shook up than I am by stupid grotesque slasher movies. This film avoids cheap exploitations to try to convey what actually happened, and I find that to be more unsettling. Go see it. It's interesting that the users' ratings are so much higher than the critics'. Full Review »
  3. Jan 23, 2016
    9
    This is a truly scary and disturbing film with a nice Law & Order feel to it. Jennifer Carpenter is fantastic in the film, and this movie madeThis is a truly scary and disturbing film with a nice Law & Order feel to it. Jennifer Carpenter is fantastic in the film, and this movie made me sleep with a light on. The Director Scott Derikson knows his horror, and I wanna see more from him in the future Full Review »