- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100Re-released now in a digitally enhanced, sonically improved and slightly longer version, the movie is even better than it was in 1973.
-
100Friedkin has said the new, expanded version of his film has a more spiritual tone. But it's still a shocker.
-
100Classically scary.
-
100Isn't just a horror film, but an American classic. Watch again and reflect for days after -- at your own risk.
-
91Here, in paranoid, bad acid trip form, is the real birth of girl power.
-
90That's what directors do when they have nothing new to say: They go back and rewrite the past, if only to avoid facing the future
-
90The best thing about the new Exorcist is the spiffed-up soundtrack.
-
90This edition of the seminal example of genre sensationalism refined by the cream of Hollywood craftsmanship is more complicated than a standard director's cut.
-
89It's shlock, yes, but at least it's highbrow shlock.
-
88Was and is a brilliant horror film, one with an archetypal ability to reach and disturb us. If I were showing The Exorcist to a friend, I would show the 1973 version without the slightest hesitation.
-
88The Exorcist has lost none of its ability to invade your nightmares.
-
88His (Friedkin) very lack of subtlety is both the strength and weakness of The Exorcist in the 21st century.
-
88Suffice it to say I prefer the original conclusion, and I think most Exorcist fans will agree
-
88The amazing thing about the film, for anyone who hasn't had an intentional Hollywood scare lately, is that it still delivers on the most visceral level
-
88Retains the power to turn heads -- and stomachs.
-
88An upsetting landmark. Don't take the children.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 37 out of 41
-
Mixed: 2 out of 41
-
Negative: 2 out of 41
-
10
-
VanessaL.10