- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Sep 7, 2001
User Score
3.9
out of 10
Generally unfavorable- based on 11 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 3 out of 11
-
Mixed: 3 out of 11
-
Negative: 5 out of 11
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JimB.Oct 3, 20012Jump, jump, swing my sword. Yawn, yawn, go home bored.
-
-
RMCrillSep 23, 20011"Sucked" is charitable. Except for three actions sequences (which were clever and well executed), this is an hour and 45 minutes of wasted time. Awful acting, notable plot missteps, and characters whose actions defy any idenity they might have built during the film. Sucked, a lot.
-
-
RobertB.Sep 12, 20012Completely bland. I was hoping it would be at least a slightly fun but brainless action movie, but they mostly stick to the "brainless" aspect for the whole thing. No funny lines. Confusing action. Bored actors. Avoid!
-
-
JoeJ.Jul 11, 20026I guess I enjoyed this more than most.
-
-
ShaneS.Sep 24, 200510I loved this movie. If you no anything about France during the 17th century you would love this movie.
-
-
Jan 11, 20124
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
60Quite handsomely produced, and there's a definite swashbuckling verve to it. Most of the characters have been contemporized, but the actors are engaging.
-
0Unspeakably awful.
-
50Moves in fits and starts, with some crafty and credible fight choreography by Xin Xin Xiong on either side of the pretty but boring middle hour.