- Studio: First Run Features
- Release Date: Sep 25, 2002
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100Haunting music, the seriousness of the allegations and riveting interviews with Alexander Haig, Christopher Hitchens (whose book inspired the film) and others give "Kissinger" extra drama and urgency.
-
100Pungent, opinionated, outspoken.
-
90Makes compelling, provocative and prescient viewing. You can draw your own conclusions.
-
88Puts you on edge about what goes on behind the closed doors of the White House. Even if the case against Kissinger is not fully convincing, the documentary keeps you glued to your seat and thinking long after you've left the theater.
-
88The Trials of Henry Kissinger serves as both a prosecution brief on the above charges and an unauthorized biography.
-
88In ''Trials,'' Hitchens is almost endearing, stalking Kissinger from one event to the next like a bleary-eyed Michael Moore.
-
88The movie never undercuts his brilliance and his unexpected charisma. No matter how high his degree of malevolence, he cuts a bigger figure after you see the movie than he did before.
-
80Bluntly effective.
-
78The film is sufficiently methodical and well-researched to walk the walk behind its controversial premise. More to the point, it's terribly involving, intriguing enough to hook documentary-shy viewers.
-
75Fascinating to watch as a portrait of political celebrity and ego.
-
While the filmmaking is standard documentary fare and the approach overtly biased, the narration, with tales of intelligence intrigue and ruthless foreign policy, is compelling and convincing.
-
75This brisk, British-American co-production is one of the better political/historical documentaries to come out in some time.
-
70The case is a convincing one, and should give anyone with a conscience reason to pause.
-
70A muckraking effort that will probably play best to the converted.
-
70A chilling history lesson in realpolitik.
-
Damning legal brief against the former secretary of state.
-
70The movie feels not only like a trial but like a trial in absentia. [7 Oct 2002, p. 108]
-
70Provides a valuable refresher course in our less-acknowledged methods of meddling in the affairs of other countries.
-
67Watching this film, one is left with the inescapable conclusion that Hitchens' obsession with Kissinger is, at bottom, a sophisticated flower child's desire to purge the world of the tooth and claw of human power. The movie isn't, finally, an argument. It's a long angry ''Boo!''
-
60Two minor drawbacks: Onscreen IDs of speakers are sometimes omitted. And Kissinger's crimes seem almost paltry in comparison to current American policies.
-
50To explore seriously the question of Kissinger's crimes wouldn't merely take hours, it would require the patient, unblinking vision of a Frederick Wiseman or Marcel Ophuls. Gibney and Jarecki just want to string the bastard up.
-
On the whole, the filmmakers hold too much to the text, and too often employ the smugly knowing, self-righteous tone typical of British telejournalism.
-
50Circumspect documentary.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
There are no user reviews yet.