- Studio: Summit Entertainment
- Release Date: Nov 18, 2011
User Score
4.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 426 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 166 out of 426
-
Mixed: 42 out of 426
-
Negative: 218 out of 426
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Nov 18, 20111
-
Nov 18, 20112
-
Nov 22, 20113
-
Nov 18, 20110Wow, a movie that makes "Jack and Jill" look like high art. Boyfriends everywhere beware, it is better to dump your girlfriend than to let he make you watch this. Certainly the least "vampire like" vampire movie I have ever seen. May as well be a two hour spot for teen bride magazine.
-
Dec 17, 20112
-
Dec 2, 20113
-
Nov 28, 20111
-
Nov 18, 20110Dear Stephanie Meyer, You Ripped off Buffy the vampire slayer and Southern Vampire Mysteries and have been far too successful with it. [2] The worst movie ever made in the Universe
-
Dec 1, 20114So supposedly you canâ
-
Nov 20, 20110I went into it, not seeing any of the previous ones, and not knowing what to expect. My girlfriend wanted to see it, so I said whatever and went. I knew it wasn't going to be good, but like, really... This was possibly, the worst movie, I have seen, in, my, life. Just...don't.
-
Nov 18, 20110Female porn in a PG-13 format, plain and simple. The women who can't get enough of these movies must lead sad, lonely lives. Why watch this garbage? The characters are dull. The story is laughable. The dialogue is flat and predictable. I'll never understand the attraction to this crap.
-
Nov 19, 20110Very bored, is a picture only for fans and made for fans, the directors dont offers nothing new and the actors are for crying. The history is horrible i dont understand why is so popular. Under your own risk to see
-
Nov 21, 20110The saga is alright, I enjoy the story...this piece though was very boring...drawn out. It could have been condensed to about 15 minutes. Too many 'i said something funny' moments for me.
-
Nov 21, 20111Absolutely disgusting movie! Don't waste your money and time for it.
I think is the front-runner for Razzie Awards next year...
Absolutely disgusting movie! Don't waste your money and time for it.
I think is the front-runner for Razzie Awards next year... -
Nov 20, 20112
-
Nov 22, 20110
-
Nov 23, 20110Worst movie ever!
its so cheesy and soul less! Worst movie ever!
its so cheesy and soul less! Worst movie ever!
its so cheesy and soul less! Worst movie ever!
its so cheesy and soul less! Worst movie ever!
its so cheesy and soul less! -
Nov 25, 20110
-
Nov 21, 20113i can not believe people can watch this... I think this movie is for the "fans" of the twilight only iam sorry but iam not a person to give this low score but this is just bad.
-
Nov 28, 20110Don't waste your time with this. Sex Scenes and Blood. That is what this movie is. Twiilight has RIPPED OFF Harry Potter with the 2 part final movie crap.
-
Nov 27, 20110Sorry I meant to give it a 0.
Alucard (Dracula's son) could kick Edwards a*s. -
Nov 26, 20110
-
Nov 26, 20113
-
Nov 22, 20110Absolutely hated it and i didnt even get what was going on i was so distracted by the dumbness of it all.it wasnt even fun to watch and laugh at as a bad movie...It was just that miserable.Bad acting,special effects,storytelling,but it is still probably the best of them all,which isnt saying much.
-
Nov 20, 20110
-
Nov 19, 20110
-
Nov 19, 20111Terriblemente mala, aburrida, cursi, tonta....enserio creen tonto al que pagó por verla. Los personajes se pasan de bobos. Es de lejos la peor de la saga.
-
Nov 20, 20110OK, this is the WORST GARBAGE I have ever seen in my life.How is this even for small kids, gj showing them the sex scenes, where is this world going now? are 10 years girls going to get pregnant and get thoughts about abortion?
1 of the worst movies ever made. -
Nov 20, 20110Bad plot, bad actors, no deep, the only ok think is the sex scene. 10 years girls are watching this movie, good way to sell your movies.
Bad parents would be proud to show this to their kids. -
Nov 20, 20111
-
Nov 20, 20111I cant believe this kind of movie exist. Unbelieve. With the budget another director can create a much better movie. Another disappointing sequel, from start to finish, clearly aimed at young teen aged girls, who love the cast members more than the actual movie. May as well be a two hour spot for teen bride magazine.
-
Nov 30, 20110To put it simply... IT WAS GAY...................................................................................................................... -__-
-
Nov 21, 20111Sucked. So do all of these movies. I can't believe someone pays to see this, let alone someone was paid to make this. So really the people that made it are making bank, the people paying these people are ____________ (you fill in the blank).
-
Nov 22, 20111
-
Nov 23, 20110Absolutely worst movie ever. I don't understand though, why the director/makeup artists feel the need to make Edward look like a waxwork...his makeup is so over the top it's hilarious. Yo go better read book.
-
Nov 24, 20113
-
Nov 26, 20110УважаемÑ
-
Nov 25, 20111This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Dec 3, 20113
-
Dec 25, 20112Overall Movie: 2 Acting: 5 Storyline: 0 Based on countless sex scenes and a bunch of fake drama, the Twilight series has officially collapsed. Not to mention that I don't care wether either Bella or Edward die. That's how good the acting is.
-
Nov 29, 20112Not as bad as expected, but ...
This new film from Twilight saga, has major improvements over the previous two. However, it still has serious problems with the special effects and a story full of predictable cliches and nonsense narrative ... sorry, it was a great effort by Bill Condon ... -
Nov 12, 20124An altogether depressing experience at this point.
-
Mar 18, 20121This was just terrible only watch this or anymore if your a fan. Worst movie of the series, nothing interesting happens, this movie is an abomination. Looking at the other user reviews your either going to be a fan boy or a hater.
-
Jun 4, 20123Sat down with Claire - who's seen all the previous ones at the cinema - and both of us laughed and smirked our way through it. First half is tortuous, second half a little better but generally **** throughout. Claire said it was the worst film she'd ever seen.
-
Feb 26, 20120A movie that is largely aimed at teenage girls, and is showing sex. Really? Is this what the world really needs? Shame on you Stephanie Meyer.
-
Feb 18, 20120Ok this movie is utter garbage. The only good movie of the three, is the first one. It's been almost 1:20 and not a single death. The first 35 min is the wedding, another 30 min of a honeymoon and another hour of Bella being prego. JUNK!!
-
May 10, 20124
-
Jan 30, 20130
-
Dec 2, 20112Bottom Line: Excruciating drop from Eclipse; utter disappointment for anyone but â
-
Dec 18, 20112If the production of this so called saga is getting better, the same cannot be said about the storyline. Possessing some ridiculous plot twists and devoid of a meaningful narrative, "The Twilight Series" finally hits the rock bottom with "Breaking Dawn, part 1"
-
Feb 11, 20123The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1, this film is simply insurpotavel simply because the actors are bad and boring and also has special effects that many are ridiculous and the blood is too fake, another reason is that the makeup is horrible
-
Feb 3, 20123Man i laugh so hard during this movie. It was a lot funnier than the first three. they where funny too. Hold on my wife just told me that they where not comedy movies. Man that sucks now they are not funny any more. They are just plain DUMB!!!!!!!!!! 3 out of 10 because it made me laugh.
-
Dec 12, 20114It's not that it's really that bad but really this is still really immature and boring plot about vampires and werewolves and an annoying whiney depressed teen that is caught in between it all. The movie had some action and fighting but the entire feeling of the movie killed it and annoys you.
-
Nov 19, 20110
-
Dec 6, 20110It Make Vampires Suck (twilight parody) a better movie. Absolutely piece of bad art, bad pictures for marriage. Painful, no pleasure at all. don't ever spend your money for this movie.
-
Dec 16, 20114If this movie stood alone, without the love that a fan would have for the characters, the actors, and or the books, it would be deemed horrible. But since we do love this fantasy, many love the film. Just dont count me as one that does.
-
Dec 18, 20112The first part was terrible. Too long, boring and sometimes with really ridiculous scenes. The second one was decent, but despite this, the film does not deserve sufficiency.
-
Jan 4, 20124
-
Jan 9, 20120
-
Jan 22, 20122
-
Jan 16, 20131It's . . . really bad, but fun to watch as a comedy.
-
Feb 4, 20124Well, for some inexplicable reason I went to see â
-
Mar 5, 20120I'm a guy, I like all kinds of movies. Liked the 3rd Twilight, didn't much care for 1 & 2, Only becuase I liked #3 did I suffer through this unbelievably boring film -- NOTHING HAPPENS AT ALL FOR THE FIRST 70 MINUTES and not a hell of a lot after that. Not the actors fault - thought they were good.
-
Mar 2, 20123What? Again? The first Twilight beautiful, New Moon regular, Eclipse awesome, and Breaking Dawn?... is terrible, really is very boring, the worst film of all this saga.
-
Mar 26, 20120Anyone who likes movies with vampires that sparkle in the sunlight are brain-dead morons. Also if your fantasy is making love to Edward Cullen you should keep dreaming because he cannot get an erection as his heart doesn't beat.
-
Mar 3, 20124Here is when my theory gets proved. Sequels are made for bad movies. This is the worst Movie of them 4 , what a bad script. This movie is just compensated by the effects that i have to admit are quite impressive. But the story is Garbage. I'm truly disappointed by these one, i was hopping to see more sparkle between the characters.
-
Mar 18, 20124
-
Jul 3, 20123Kristen Stewart's performance has finally approached Bella's character, she is still anti-social but not as much and her facial expressions variate at last. Still, the movie isn't what i thought it would be. A s a fan of the books, I expected more.
-
Oct 6, 20122Ever worsening saga (if it can be called a saga), the film is pessimo, paradão, you have nothing to draw attention ... bad visual effects, makeup improved somewhat, the performance worsened Kristen Stewart wakes !! The soundtrack so feeble, I hope part 2 excel and save the whole saga.
-
Aug 25, 20120I've heard people say that certain cinema-goers should lighten up and enjoy this film for what it was intended to be which was a little fun. However I can confirm that nothing actually happens in this film. There is very little storyline and to be honest I thought it was going to turn into some softcore porn the way the film was going! I could have condensed this film to about 25 minutes.
-
May 1, 20131
-
20Bill Condon (Dreamgirls, Chicago, Gods and Monsters) takes over the directing reins for these final two parts; his most noteworthy contribution to the series so far is a terrifyingly staged birth scene that should turn the teen fan base off of sex altogether … which is precisely what this whole dumb, punishing series has been gunning for from the start.
-
60In any case, the last twenty minutes of Breaking Dawn are so harrowing that it's possible to forget that most of the acting is soap-operatic (the guy who plays Carlisle is aging to look like Liberace) and the dialogue from hunger. The movie's that primal.
-
50One seriously sick little blockbuster.