Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: January 16, 2004
8.8
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 84 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
72
Mixed:
4
Negative:
8
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
3
Tss5078Feb 22, 2013
WOW! It's the Fast the Furious on motorcycles! Torque is a ridiculous film from the producers of the Fast the Furious, and it's basically the same movie except for a few key points. First they didn't have the budget of the Fast the FuriousWOW! It's the Fast the Furious on motorcycles! Torque is a ridiculous film from the producers of the Fast the Furious, and it's basically the same movie except for a few key points. First they didn't have the budget of the Fast the Furious which is evident by the stunts, which at times actually looked like a video game. I'm all for stunt men doing impossible things, and I don't mind good computer generated action either, however the CGI in Torque is just ridiculously bad, it is however nowhere near as bad as the acting. Instead of Vin Diesel and the dashing Paul Walker, the producers of this film settled for Ice Cube and some guy no one has ever heard of and trust me, the inexperience shows. This film is just as bad as all the other reviews say it is. Some poorly written, badly acted films, can be entertaining...Torque is not! Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
5
oxanaJan 3, 2015
Not a bad movie, but then again, it had nothing new in it. Felt like it took a part from here and there, and everything said and done was already done somewhere else. Martin Henderson is also a look-a-like of Peter Facinelli (from Fastlane),Not a bad movie, but then again, it had nothing new in it. Felt like it took a part from here and there, and everything said and done was already done somewhere else. Martin Henderson is also a look-a-like of Peter Facinelli (from Fastlane), and it was both sweet and annoying. I raise my flag for Fastlane any time. At least they had an air of originality around the tv series. There were some nice twists in the plot, but then again, those were nothing new. Also the basic need of showing off motorcycles and fast cars was almost ridiculous at times - but that's part of the deal in a movie like this. Like said above, this is not bad! I've seen much, much worse. Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
0
BrendWOct 11, 2005
Hmmmm, ...Where to start, The acting was mind numbingly flat, the story line was even worse, and by the time the action started I was almost asleep. If it wasn't for the bikes I probably would have switched it off. Save your self the Hmmmm, ...Where to start, The acting was mind numbingly flat, the story line was even worse, and by the time the action started I was almost asleep. If it wasn't for the bikes I probably would have switched it off. Save your self the lost of a few brain cells and just don't watch it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
RirenJun 16, 2007
Terrible cinematography uses close-ups and poor camera angles to ruin the few good stunts and visual spectacles, while bad acting and worthless direction do nothing to help the awful plot. There is no sense in the action, which lacks Terrible cinematography uses close-ups and poor camera angles to ruin the few good stunts and visual spectacles, while bad acting and worthless direction do nothing to help the awful plot. There is no sense in the action, which lacks plausibility, entertainment and realism - 0 for 3 is pretty bad in an action flick. This movie looks to have been made solely for the egos of its actors, but none of them are serviced well. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
CineAutoctonoDec 25, 2015
It was a good-looking movie in fast and furious , but motorcycles ?, because the idea was logical , but not as entertaining as we think , the better I'll take the car fast and furious.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews