- Studio: Lionsgate
- Release Date: Nov 26, 2008
User Score
5.7
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 45 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 26 out of 45
-
Mixed: 10 out of 45
-
Negative: 9 out of 45
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Sep 23, 20114The movie, unlike its prequels, tends to focus on its cars and become alienated from the pure action it can deliver.
-
ChavoG.Dec 10, 200810Pure gold.
-
-
CorbGNov 29, 20081Not nearly as fun as the last 2. The love interest is one of the worst characters in recent movie history. Skip this movie!!!!
-
-
KendallBApr 6, 200910The accent from Rudakova was great addition to the movie and coupled with Statham's fighting Transporter 3 deserves a great review.
-
-
SusdarV.Dec 8, 20087Overall a good entertaining action flick, liked it better than transporter1 & 2.
-
-
FreebFFeb 4, 20098"The best action movie in 2008, "Transporter 3" takes the action to the extreme, and shows off Jason Statham's "chops" in a way that Schwartzenegger or Stallone never could. Jason's turn last year in the critically acclaimed period drama, "The Bank Job, " hasn't kept him from flexing his muscles in this latest film."
-
-
UrselaBMar 30, 20096
-
-
ChadS.Nov 28, 20087
-
-
AronJ.Dec 1, 20085I enjoyed the action scenes, but the dialogue was pretty horrible. It seemed the only real appeal to this movie is the action scenes and the plot was somewhat ignored
-
-
klDec 12, 20080Terrible. stopped watching after 20 mins.
-
-
OliverH.Dec 16, 20082
-
-
MattF.Dec 2, 20080EPIC. FAIL. Seriously, one of the worst movies I have seen in my life. The CG was awful, the dialogue was AWFUL, and the action scenes (especially anything with cars involved) were laughably unrealistic. You know a movie is terrible when they have to fast forward the car chase to make it more exciting.
-
-
ChrisR.Dec 5, 20085
-
-
DonM.Dec 16, 20081
-
-
Mar 9, 20136Its better than the second one but still everything you see in this film, you have seen in its predecessors. This film delivers nothing fresh.
-
Sep 26, 20114
-
Dec 17, 20125An OK attempt but the third film really didn't add anything new. It would have been better if it wasn't actually made. The story and action and humour are nowhere near the other two films though.
-
30Easily the worst in a trilogy that has been notable mainly for the presence of its everyman action star, Transporter 3 is a nonsensical, choppily edited bore, with awful dialogue.
-
50Boasts a measure of the retro machismo, style and attitude some 007 fans have found lacking in "Quantum of Solace." But it also has a pointless storyline, incoherent editing and a polyglot cast that renders some of the dialogue utterly incomprehensible.
-
50Transporter 3 is the most frustrating entry into a series that has never set the bar terribly high.