Metascore
43

Mixed or average reviews - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 16
  2. Negative: 2 out of 16
  1. Reviewed by: Sara Stewart
    Jun 6, 2013
    38
    Predicated almost entirely on the repeated juxtaposition of innocent girlishness and mindless violence, Violet & Daisy could still have been campy fun β€” instead, it wilts for lack of wit.
  2. Reviewed by: Rex Reed
    Jun 4, 2013
    25
    This disoriented drivel was written by β€” and marks the directing debut of β€” Geoffrey Fletcher, who won an Academy Award for writing "Precious." It’s weird, but not in a good way.
User Score
6.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 5
  3. Negative: 1 out of 5
  1. Dec 14, 2013
    3
    The only reason to watch VIOLET AND DAISY is if you are very fond of the three lead actors. Otherwise the tedium and lack of believability make it difficult to watch through to the end. Find another way to say goodbye to James Gandolfini. Full Review »
  2. Oct 5, 2013
    10
    That was an exceptionally clever film.
    If you aren't paying attention you will completely miss what is really happening.

    Lets just say
    that any critic who complained about the semi-emotionless acting of the girls or the seemingly unconnected dream sequences completely missed the real story. Full Review »
  3. Jul 15, 2013
    7
    Late James Gandolfini won't mind a chessy-action flick after his death, would he? Violet And Daisy is a corny movie starring Saroise Ronan yeah, THAT girl from The Host and another chick. It's a story about two sisters and their job of assassins with a mild taunt mission to hunt down a mega criminal played by Gandolfini. Let me get this straight- Violet And Daisy is FUN. Just awesome, Bourne and Taken with Superbad type FUN. It's jarring and violent with a hyper speed that's pumping till the end. Full Review »