- Studio: Lions Gate Films
- Release Date: Apr 26, 2002
User Score
4.2
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 33 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 14 out of 33
-
Mixed: 2 out of 33
-
Negative: 17 out of 33
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
EllenAJan 31, 20098
-
-
BrianC.Oct 15, 20020Garbage. The acting is horrible. The story is insipid and senseless. If you gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of video cameras, by the law of everages one would shoot a masterpiece. The rest of them would shoot something far superior to "Vulgar."
-
-
NotIanDec 29, 200210
-
-
CiggyAug 7, 20028You fu..ing clown shoes don't know the first thing about film.
-
-
LoddeD.Jul 9, 20030
-
-
Jay.G.Aug 5, 20037Johnson tried to "smith" up his dialogue, but obviously wasn't smith. Acting could've been MUCH better. Yet, I felt the stroy was very dark and compelling.
-
-
RobinK.Apr 21, 20055Well, it certainly caught my attention. Graphic, violent, sick, frightening because you know this sht has happened (well, maybe not to a clown). I found myself getting bored in spots though. It was a long, but interesting half hour.
-
-
JakeH.Jun 24, 20080I don't know what anyone else thinks.... but this was horrifically disurbing
-
-
JackL.Oct 4, 20020Shocking doesn't mean it has worth. Worst movie of the year.
-
-
k-doglamboJun 12, 200210I loved the man on man action.
-
-
MarkO.Sep 6, 20020Worst thing I ever saw. I want my money back.
-
-
FormerlyKnownAsGilbertMulroneycakesJul 13, 20030I'm not easily offended. I have a very high threshold for sickness, provided it's entertaining, faintly tongue-in-cheek sickness. This movie uses male rape (represented by a scene so horrible that Gaspar Noé would cough a little) as a plot point. Thank you, goodbye. Kevin Smith: please don't quit, but do in future get a second opinion.
-
-
RobJul 2, 20030This movie was pointless and disgusting. Whomever is calling it, "brilliant", "an undiscovered gem", or "true art", needs to get their pretentiously artsy heads out of their respective asses.
-
-
JonathanH.Apr 19, 20040Bad in every single way, which means it'll most likely become a cult film.
-
-
AustinA.Mar 10, 20051The name says it all.
-
-
NanrekK.Sep 16, 20050Watching this movie is almost as painful as getting kicked in the groin!
-
-
StephenC.May 8, 20081An insult to amateur filmmaking. I have friends who's college movies were better than this very badly acted and written and directed movie that wants to be "indy" but looks like someone shot it with a camcorder. Didn't find it disturbing because I didn't buy a minute of the movie. Terrible.
-
-
JohnCJun 14, 20090Ugly, absurd and absolutely terrible. So dirty you will need a few showers after this one.
-
-
RichardP.Dec 8, 20038This is not a bad movie. It's a low budget movie. It is, perhaps ,disturbing. It's not bad though. I think those that find the homo=sexual rape scene so "vulgar" (it is not graphic) would,most likely, not be similarly offended were it a hetro-sexual rape. In short: Worth seeing.
-
-
DaneY.Jan 16, 20048
-
-
SamOct 16, 20050Absoloutley overated. Notice the 5 on the metacritic score, YOU FOLLOW?!?
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
10The acting tends toward the cartoonish (not in a good way), and the story is built on a series of illogical motivations.
-
0The only thing shocking about it, however, is the degree to which self-congratulatory gutter exhibitionism has become the degraded ash end of indie ''edge.''
-
Johnson does seem to have some psycho-sexual ax to grind amid all this visual and sexual crudity. For instance, women barely figure in the action, with Will taking on various stereotypical feminine attributes. But good luck finding meaning in all this mess.