- Studio: USA Films
- Release Date: Mar 24, 2000
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100One of the most powerful romances of recent years, it is as generous as they come.
-
100Gordon directs with a graceful precision and shorthand that makes the story seem simple, though it's anything but. Indeed, it's fascinatingly complex, juggling time periods and political, mystical, and psychological themes without ever losing touch with the core message: Love conquers all.
-
90It is a film of uncommon intelligence and rigor that illuminates a complex era, and the romance at its center is also one of exceptional passion and honesty.
-
75Offbeat tale, which tackles weighty themes. But sentimentality overtakes intelligence.
-
75It's almost startling to see a film that believes in itself and its characters so deeply.
-
75It's a romantic weepie.
-
75Structurally flawed, occasionally shlocky, but written with unusual intelligence and subtlety.
-
Gordon deserves credit for at least attempting to deal with political themes, and the tension isn't bad either.
-
75A film with a real depth, resonance and texture, and room for an ensemble of supporting characters.
-
70Catches the volatile beauty of what it was to be alive and politically aware in the early '70s with a rare accuracy and depth.
-
70A pensive, reflective movie, more or less equal in tone to Ang Lee's "The Ice Storm," yet, because of its temporal breadth and tight emotional focus, it packs a more intimate punch.
-
70This wonderfully acted romance brings the touching fantasy "Truly, Madly, Deeply" to mind.
-
63Has a good heart and some fine performances, but is too muddled at the story level to involve us emotionally.
-
63As involved as Crudup and Connelly beseech you to be with this story, their very youthfulness, their nagging lack of adulthood, keeps the film from being anything more credible than a tight grad-school tryst.
-
60Its virtues are still genuine and durable enough to resist the blandishments of hype.
-
58The movie is a shambles, a rambling, disjointed love tragedy with a story that amounts to little more than a mess of fade-outs, sloppy montages, and dramatic sketches.
-
By the time of Fielding's and Sarah's final, gooey encounter, she's not the only one who needs waking.
-
50It's too fragmented and diffuse to ever bring its parts together in any really satisfying manner.
-
50A tale of conscience lost and found becomes little more than a smart but tepid ghost story for idealists and '60s survivors, and not a terribly spooky one at that.
-
50The film is one of the more adult offerings out there in a spring movie season peppered with martial arts and superheroes. It may be just what you're looking for.
-
50Enough to anesthetize the living.
-
50Gorden teases out some affecting scenes, but not enough to carry a film that promises more than it delivers.
-
50Its evocation of the politics and Zeitgeist of the late '60s is so right on, as we used to say, that it left me stunned.
-
50Crudup tends to take average parts in standard genre films and turn them into something special.
-
50Forever stumbling over itself and breaking its own spell.
-
As so often happens, politics and religion add up to a double dose of self-righteousness.
-
25Spanning the counterculture '70s to the more career-oriented '80s and doing justice to neither decade, this event-heavy adaptation of Scott Spencer's novel may give viewers whiplash.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 5 out of 6
-
Mixed: 1 out of 6
-
Negative: 0 out of 6
-
MeganR.10this movie is so great!ever since i seen it, i can't stop, Jennifer has done the best ever in her performance! 10.