Metascore
68 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 32 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 32
  2. Negative: 2 out of 32
  1. It's impossible to imagine anyone, right-leaning or left, coming away from this hugely important documentary unshaken by its representation of the United States and its military establishment.
  2. 100
    It's a topical, iconoclastic documentary with the warmth and pace of a first-rate personal essay.
  3. Jarecki is no glib ideologue thumbing his nose at power.
  4. Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    90
    Picture sets the gold standard for political documentaries.
  5. 88
    Why We Fight deserves high praise for making it that much tougher to wear blinders.
  6. Reviewed by: Ty Burr
    88
    An agit-doc of unusual depth. It has a point -- that the primary business of America over the past half-century has been waging war -- and it supports that point with nuance, research, and a willingness to hear the other side of the argument.
  7. There's plenty of ammunition here for liberal conspiracy theorists, which surely will limit the audience to those already in Jarecki's political camp. Which is too bad, for it is a sobering history lesson as well as a political polemic on foreign policy and the growth of war into America's biggest business.
  8. 80
    A film that stands out for its passion, ambition and clarion-call sincerity, even amid the contemporary onslaught of political documentaries.
  9. Memo to left-wing anti-Bushies: Stories like this work. Don't lecture. Tell stories! Much better!
  10. 78
    Canny and somewhat overwhelming documentary.
  11. 75
    There's no denying the particular political slant of Why We Fight, but Jarecki's thoughtful, nonconfrontational approach makes it absorbing viewing, regardless of whether or not you buy his arguments.
  12. Whether we've reached the critical mass of "misplaced power" is the gist of the current national debate, and Why We Fight is a useful tool in that argument.
  13. Reviewed by: Neva Chonin
    75
    A somber polemic that presents a convincing case against using war as an economic booster -- although, Jarecki argues, that is precisely what the United States has been doing under every president since Truman.
  14. 75
    It's a deeply provocative piece of filmmaking.
  15. Reviewed by: Mike Clark
    75
    The result isn't quite a Michael Moore movie without the hubris, but it's reasonably close. It's thoughtful, and you have to take it seriously and with respect.
  16. The strength of this documentary lies in its balance, or at least the careful appearance of balance.
  17. In addition to the usual pontificators like Gore Vidal, whose world weariness has assumed Olympian proportions, the director provides interviews with such right-wing counterparts as Richard Perle and William Kristol. Nobody is allowed much time to develop an argument.
  18. 75
    Why We Fight attempts, somewhat sketchily, to connect the dots between Ike's Cassandra-like warnings and current events.
  19. 75
    Ultimately, Why We Fight reveals itself as yet another leftie doc with an anti-war agenda. But the mere fact that it takes time to ask questions and listen to opposing viewpoints sets it apart from the pack.
  20. 70
    Jarecki's film forcefully argues that the much abused word FREEDOM cannot paper over the conflicts between capitalism and democracy.
  21. Adding to the film's underlying sense of urgency and unease is composer Robert Miller's haunting score, so reminiscent of Philip Glass' music for "The Fog of War."
  22. 70
    The long line of recent muckraking documentaries that has preceded Why We Fight does nothing to diminish its force.
  23. Jarecki says that his film doesn't precisely answer the question in his title. He is mistaken.
  24. 70
    Despite Jarecki's varied success in bringing these six people's stories to life, their stories personalize our current geopolitical predicament and remind us that in a democracy no one can shrug off responsibility for the war.
  25. Reviewed by: David Ansen
    60
    This scary, eye-opening documentary looks back from a post-9/11 vantage point to see how Ike's prophecy has come horribly true.
  26. 50
    The movie tells us nothing we haven't heard before.
  27. A pretty entertaining case against our current war and question the integrity of our president, but more than that, these docs manipulate imagery, music and sound bites to work their audiences into a frenzy.
  28. Mr. Jarecki forcefully, if not with wholesale persuasiveness, argues that our business is specifically war.
  29. 50
    Unconvincing and ineffective; the many patches of ideological montage, growing like kudzu throughout the film, weaken the impact of its best moments.
  30. 40
    There may not be two equal sides to every argument, but in giving such little credence to those who might oppose him, Jarecki makes us wonder what exactly it is he's so afraid of.
  31. Reviewed by: Kyle Smith
    38
    This rehash of familiar pacifist arguments offers neither heat nor light. It's "Fahrenheit: Room Temperature."
  32. Mr. Jarecki undercuts his own case -- not just undercuts but carpet-bombs it -- by using the same propaganda techniques he professes to abhor.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 22 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 10
  2. Negative: 2 out of 10
  1. Riren
    5
    This documentary is unfortunately highly biased and tries to coerce rather than inform, a trend in modern documentary. It does not even come close to answering the sociological question of violence in America, or even the U.S.'s reasons for going to war throughout so much of its history. However, it is very informative about the military industrial complex - indeed, if 45 minutes were cut off the film, it could be repackaged as a documentary about just that, though then the film wouldn't be as sensational. It employs the tired, old propoganda tricks, like quotes taken out of context, a few anonymous quotes used to indicate the minds of millions, and musical montages that don't technically state an opinion but still beat you over the head with it. The film's real answer to why we fight is that there is a vast organization of businesses that profit off of war, and that they have infected politics to make sure they keep raking in the billions. This is a disturbing part of the answer, but unfortunately it is only a part - and the rest isn't that U.S. citizens are all dumb and none of the politicians care. Don't get me wrong, it's a great question. Hopefully a better documentary will try to answer it someday. Full Review »
  2. FloydB.
    2
    If people are to be awakened to what is going on about why we create wars of aggression, this documentary is not very good. What was the producer afraid of? I bought the DVD waste of money. Full Review »
  3. JoseS.
    2
    This was more a two hour editorial than a documentary. It was filled with opinions only, no facts. I agree with the general motivation behind it, but it was unfocused. The central theme revolves around an impossible to prove theory about the "military industrial complex," implying some collusion between political, military, and industrial leaders. This film has all of the bad aspects of a Michael Moore film, but none of the good. What is most disappointing is that facts exist to support some theories similar to what was attempted; however, the film lacks the sophistication to really do any of these theories justice. Ultimately, it was nothing more than a juvenile, unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. Full Review »