- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100"Elizabeth I" soars on every level from the writing, to the directing to the acting.
-
100An explosion of fireworks. [1 May 2006, p.39]
-
100The lavishly beguiling historical drama is pumped up on passion, wit and the majestic fire of Helen Mirren's thrilling performance as one of history's most intriguing rulers.
-
100Mirren is TV-biography magic.
-
91Mirren's Elzabeth is emotional... But with that comes soemthing as rare on TV as it is rewarding--a love affair involving people over the age of 50. [21 Apr 2006, p.67]
-
90Elizabeth I features two of the finest actors [Mirren and Irons] in film and television inspiring each other to some of the most spectacular work they have ever done.
-
88Elizabeth is mercurial, powerful, unpredictable - qualities made real, and a bit frightening, because of the intensity with which Mirren commits to the role.
-
88As Elizabeth movies go, this version has neither the sweep of Glenda Jackson's Elizabeth R nor the easily digested entertainment value of Bette Davis' Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex. But it has Mirren, and that's reason enough to make it and watch it.
-
80Mirren, a true virtuoso at the height of her powers, is what makes this excellent two-part film worth watching, but there are many other pluses as well.
-
80Mirren... hits a dazzling career high.
-
80Somewhat plodding through its opening hour, "Elizabeth I" gains steam and then soars through its concluding installment.
-
80Impressive... Ms. Mirren leaves her authoritative stamp on the role of Elizabeth.
-
80No matter how opulent this production, Mirren is never upstaged, and she is the best reason to keep watching.
-
80Elizabeth [is] portrayed by Mirren in as brilliant a performance as you're likely to see.
-
80An engrossing, humanizing portrait of the British monarch.
-
70[Mirren] delivers big-time... Congratulations should also go to Nigel Williams, whose screenplay for Elizabeth I is as sassy as Tom Stoppard's was for Shakespeare in Love.
-
70"Elizabeth I" was made for television and is not a lavish, big-budget production. Visually, it is no match for the 1998 movie. But what "Elizabeth I" does offer is not insignificant: a richly drawn portrait of a powerful woman who is both ruthless and sentimental, formidable and mercurial, vain and likable.
-
70It is a great performance [by Mirren], strong enough that it overcomes the flaws of "Elizabeth I."
-
63Irons and the rest of the cast are spot-on. The writing and directing are fairly crisp. Perhaps, though, tracing Elizabeth's life for 20-plus years subtracted from my becoming intently involved in each period of this biopic.
-
60[It] would be an above-average Masterpiece [Theatre] installment.
-
50The film as a whole is a strange case of mostly excellent parts that make an overlong and tedious whole.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 9 out of 11
-
Mixed: 0 out of 11
-
Negative: 2 out of 11
-
kelseyw2
-
RandyM10
-
K8rpot8rFaith10