Call of Duty: WWII

 PC
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 21
  3. Negative: 1 out of 21
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Gamer.no
    Nov 7, 2017
    40
    Call of Duty: WWII gives the impression of being prematurely published, and has a plethora of serious flaws. It’s return to the series roots is in setting only, and the game pales in comparison to the classics it draws inspiration from.
This publication does not provide a score for their reviews.
This publication has not posted a final review score yet.
These unscored reviews do not factor into the Metascore calculation.

In Progress & Unscored

?
  1. Rock, Paper, Shotgun
    Nov 3, 2017
    Call of Duty: WW2 is a decent game with satisfying shooting at its core, but there are better playgrounds out there. [Multiplayer review]
  2. Shacknews
    Nov 3, 2017
    Call of Duty: WW2 is competently made by a skilled team. I just wish some of that talent and skill could be put towards anything other than this yearly pile of linear shooting rehash. The game runs well and is very playable, so things aren’t all that bad, they just feel soulless. All I could think of while playing is how I would rather be killing Nazis in Wolfenstein 2. [Provisional Score = 50]

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2017
21
#21 Most Shared PC Game of 2017

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
4.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 968 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 274 out of 968
  2. Mixed: 207 out of 968
  3. Negative: 487 out of 968
  1. pipadenis
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Well I am not in the habit of writing critic reviews but I just could no longer keep silence after playing this "gem" for couple of hours.Well I am not in the habit of writing critic reviews but I just could no longer keep silence after playing this "gem" for couple of hours. First and foremost, this game is an utter representation of every single ailment the game industry has suffered over the last decade. Is just blatantly bad, with no light visible in sheer darkness. It plays and look as a game from 2008 at best, blurry textures and almost no destructible environments. From the very first mission its hard not to notice how stingy the game budget was- the Normandy mission had me sent clearing 5 bunkers in a row without capturing the scale and magnitude of this highly important historical spectacle at all. This is not funny Activision, you should be utterly ashamed of releasing this piece of unheard of cash-grab in 2017. This is a theft of massive proportions. They just continue to lure gamers into this festival of utter mediocrity without having any care for the consequences they might face. This has to end.

    To sum things up

    PROS :
    Mm, no automatic health regenaration anymore, look for med-kits this time

    CONS:
    dismal visual quality ( blurry textures, weak physical model, bad SSAO quality and list can go on)
    extremely repetitive gameplay
    poor enemy AI
    loot-boxes, micro-transactions,
    no improvements whatsoever    … Full Review »
  2. Filaton
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    A twitch shooter with lootboxes, dlc and an alternate history WW2 theme. I mean, who wouldn't want to play as a black woman in service of theA twitch shooter with lootboxes, dlc and an alternate history WW2 theme. I mean, who wouldn't want to play as a black woman in service of the Wehrmacht.… Full Review »
  3. Sabardo
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Yet again another COD that doesn't provide anything else than piece of garbade cash grab game. These FPS series are so milked dry that theyYet again another COD that doesn't provide anything else than piece of garbade cash grab game. These FPS series are so milked dry that they should just cancel the whole genre for few years.… Full Review »
See all user reviews »