Blue in the Face

Name: Blue in the Face
Genre: Comedy
Released: October 13, 1995
Duration: 83 min
Rating: 54
Cast: Lou Reed, Michael J. Fox, Roseanne

1995

METASCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 16 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 18 Ratings

See All

7.5

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

7.5	Your Score
7.5	User Score Generally favorable reviews based on 18 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Blue In The Face

Now Playing: Blue In The Face

Movie Details & Credits

Miramax Films | Release Date: October 13, 1995 | R

Starring: Lou Reed, Michael J. Fox, Roseanne

Summary: In this follow-up to "Smoke," it's nonstop laughs when a wacky group of locals visits the neighborhood cigar shop, looking for good times ... and finding plenty of hilarious fun! But when the greedy owner threatens to close the shop for good -- and turn it into a trendy vegetarian restaurant -- the neighborhood proves they'll do just aboutIn this follow-up to "Smoke," it's nonstop laughs when a wacky group of locals visits the neighborhood cigar shop, looking for good times ... and finding plenty of hilarious fun! But when the greedy owner threatens to close the shop for good -- and turn it into a trendy vegetarian restaurant -- the neighborhood proves they'll do just about anything to save their favorite hangout! (Miramax)… Expand

Director: Harvey Wang and Paul Auster and Wayne Wang

Genre(s): Comedy

Rating: R

Runtime: 83 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

James Berardinelli

The film is so exuberant that we don't care whether we're listening to Lou Reed's off-the-cuff comments about New York, watching Mel Gorham do a sexy dance in front of a mirror, or hearing Jim Jarmusch's ramblings on the romance of the smoking culture. Read full review

Kevin Thomas

[The movie has] considerable charm and humor....Adam Holender's fresh, airy camera work and a vibrant electric score also add vitality to an all-talk film. [13 Oct 1999, p.F8]

David Sterritt

The results are ragged, disjointed, and endearing. Read full review

Barbara Shulgasser

More about having a good time with some interesting people than it is about watching a fine movie. Read full review

Marc Savlov

Jim Jarmusch's elegiac, hilarious performance as a man about to smoke his final cigarette is brilliant. Read full review

Hal Hinson

An unpredictable, occasionally amusing, wildly uneven portrait of a neighborhood struggling to hold on to its identity. Read full review

Peter Travers

What a bold notion for a movie, and what a bust in terms of execution. Read full review

SEE ALL 16 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

BerC

Jun 20, 2016

The artistic medium of film is very subjective. Every audience member has a different set of criteria they use to measure their viewing experience. Not everyone shares the same set of criteria. If we did, what a bland and uninspired world this would be.

What I Personally Liked About "BlueThe artistic medium of film is very subjective. Every audience member has a different set of criteria they use to measure their viewing experience. Not everyone shares the same set of criteria. If we did, what a bland and uninspired world this would be.

What I Personally Liked About "Blue in the Face":
The loose, improvisational quality of this film allows for some truly unconventional moments to occur. Where its predecessor "Smoke" was tighter and found rich detail in the ordered precision from director Wayne Wang, this sequel succeeds (to some extent) because it tosses that format right out the window. There is also some wonderful humor present in this movie, both through deadpan interpretation and exaggerated expressiveness depending on the performer delivering the laughs. For example, witness the purse-snatching scene involving Mira Sorvino or Michael J. Fox polling Giancarlo Esposito. I also very much enjoyed Jim Jarmusch and Lou Reed. Their segments were among the best in the film. I could listen to these guys tell stories all day long. That could have been the whole movie right there and I would have been happy. Another dynamite cast member was Mel Gorham, who redefined Spanish sexuality on screen in her surprisingly steamy role.

What I Personally Disliked About "Blue in the Face":
A couple of the more argumentative segments simply did not work. When Peggy Gormley and Stephen Gevedon have their shouting match, it is just painful to watch and feels really out of place next to the rest of the material. In addition, Roseanne Barr doesn't fit into this film. At all. Her scenes slow up the entire picture and if she wasn't sharing screen time with Harvey Keitel, they would be absolutely worthless. Speaking of which, this film could have used a lot more randomness with Keitel himself. He seems to stand in the shadows more than he stands in the spotlight and he could have given so much more charm to the film had he been featured more often. After all, if you're going to have a channel to focus some of your madness through, shouldn't it be Auggie Wren, the character who inspired this sequel in the first place? Some of the workable sequences seem far too short as well. There are plenty of oddball moments which could have been expanded upon. At a measly eighty-three minutes, it's not like the filmmakers were in danger of overstaying their welcome. The narrative involving the possible closing of the smoke shop was unnecessary, too. The production would have been infinitely better as an experimental, plot-less motion picture tied together only by stories of Brooklyn and examples of the city's inhabitants in action.

My Overall Impression of "Blue in the Face":
What works really works and what doesn't work really (for lack of a better term) sucks. It's a mixed bag that's worth a watch, but the end result could have been so much better if they had not limited themselves to shooting the entire production in less than a week.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 1 REVIEWS

76	#76 Best Movie of 1995
92	#92 Most Discussed Movie of 1995
66	#66 Most Shared Movie of 1995