Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: July 16, 2004
8.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 456 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
364
Mixed:
64
Negative:
28
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
4
grandpajoe6191Sep 23, 2011
The movie's motives and premise is simply one of the dumbest things I've seen since the Ed Wood era. That is why "I, Robot" is a well ended movie, but with a terrible start.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
5
jimmytancrediMay 30, 2011
The highest point of the film is undoubtedly the script. Balconies with super smart and well-constructed dialogue, the film shows the writers' job well done. And what scene is that one of the blink at the end? Genial. Will Smith's characterThe highest point of the film is undoubtedly the script. Balconies with super smart and well-constructed dialogue, the film shows the writers' job well done. And what scene is that one of the blink at the end? Genial. Will Smith's character takes a lot to be charismatic. In the first 30 minutes I started to say that was such a big mistake to choose him as the protagonist of the film. I was wrong, he shows his past and his psychological construction gets well structured. Charismatic yes, but could be better. I, Robot is one of the best movies set in the future. Chicago of 2035 was extremely realistic, though. Moreover, another defect of the film is the merchandising. How did Converse pay for that exhibition of All-Star? And the Audi logo appearing all the time? To me it doesn't seem coincidental that the main robot is named Sonny. Even with two N's, it is worth remembering that in U.S. the name is only pronounced, not written. It may sound conspiracy theory, but I found relevant. Apart from some minimal defects, "I, Robot" is a good movie. Those kind that you get a good feeling after watching it. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
MovieGuysDec 31, 2013
I, Robot can be action-packed and fun to watch at some parts, and at some points it can be a bit jumpy and hyper. The movie is predictable, and has no twists and turns. But that's what most people who watch this are looking for. Action andI, Robot can be action-packed and fun to watch at some parts, and at some points it can be a bit jumpy and hyper. The movie is predictable, and has no twists and turns. But that's what most people who watch this are looking for. Action and gunfire for story and substance. Fair trade. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
MovieMasterEddyApr 3, 2016
When robots finally take over the world (assuming they haven't already) we will not be able to say we weren't warned. Every year, Hollywood studios present dire scenarios in which androids, computers and artificial-intelligence applicationsWhen robots finally take over the world (assuming they haven't already) we will not be able to say we weren't warned. Every year, Hollywood studios present dire scenarios in which androids, computers and artificial-intelligence applications run amok and enslave the human race, but the public never seems to get the message. Perhaps "I, Robot," a hectic, half-baked science-fiction thriller that opens today nationwide, will succeed where the "Terminator" and "Matrix" movies failed, and alert us to the grave danger that our innocent-looking toasters, vacuum cleaners, smart cars and laptop computers really pose.

At the same time, "I, Robot," directed by Alex Proyas and "suggested by" Isaac Asimov's 1950 book of short stories, may inspire some tenderness toward the technological doodads that run our lives. This is because, like other movies in this dystopian vein (including "Blade Runner" and "A.I."), it proposes that machines have feelings, too. The robots in this familiar future (the movie takes place in Chicago in 2035) have not only the intelligence necessary to turn against their human creators, but also the capacity to dream, to love and to suffer. At the screening I attended, cellphones and laptops were confiscated at the door. Supposedly, this was to prevent piracy, but I'm not so sure. Maybe 20th Century Fox wanted to make sure those clever gadgets didn't get any ideas, or maybe the studio just wanted to protect their feelings.

Del Spooner, a brooding, wise-cracking homicide detective played with weary action-hero bravado by Will Smith, shows no such sensitivity. He is, in fact, a raging anti-robot bigot, harboring a grudge against the helpful, polite machines that shuffle around the city running errands and doing menial work. Early in the movie, he chases down a robot he mistakenly believes has stolen a woman's purse, only to discover that he has been guilty of technological profiling. He is repeatedly scolded for his prejudice — by his grandmother (Adrian Ricard), by his boss (Chi McBride) and by the sinister head of the top robot-producing corporation (Bruce Greenwood) — which gives the movie an interesting undercurrent of racial irony.

Spooner's attitude also revives some familiar conundrums of sci-fi philosophy, which the script, written by Jeff Vintar and Akiva Goldsman, tackles in lengthy expository scenes. Where is the boundary between the human and the nonhuman? How does the technological blurring of this boundary affect our ethical conceptions of humanity and inhumanity?

These questions are batted around in a series of arguments between Spooner and Dr. Susan Calvin (Bridget Moynahan), who meet in the course of Spooner's investigation into the death of a kindly old scientist.

Spooner suspects that the man, a friend of his, was murdered by a robot, a possibility that seems at once logical and unthinkable, since the company's robots are governed by three laws, the first of which is that they can never harm a human. But the main suspect, a soulful prototype named Sonny (a computer-enhanced special effect voiced by Alan Tudyk), has developed a mind and a will of his own, which makes him a harbinger of apocalyptic danger as well as a friendly sidekick.

"You're the dumbest smart person I've ever met," Spooner says to Dr. Calvin during one of their debates, and "I, Robot" is one of the smarter dumb movies I've seen in a while. Its vision of the future is a grab-bag of borrowings from other pictures: the evil corporation from "Robocop," the urban consumer environment from "Minority Report," the sleek and agile killer robots from the last two "Terminator" movies, the climactic riot from, of all things, "Gangs of New York."

A straightforward genre exercise, directed with more competence than inspiration, "I, Robot" lacks both the intellectual rigor and the soulful sublimity of "A.I.," but it nonetheless allows some genuine ideas and emotions to pop up amid the noise and clutter. The overwrought ending tries to bring these into some kind of coherence, and the filmmakers deserve some credit for the effort, even though "I, Robot" makes less sense the more you think about it.

Which, I suppose, is just as silly as taking the film seriously as a cautionary tale. Still, this kind of movie presents a troubling paradox, since it is an example of the very phenomenon it purports to warn against. Dramatizing the threat of runaway technology seems to demand ever greater technological innovation, as digitized special effects increasingly push human beings off screen.

Sonny, with his mournful blue eyes and his smooth features, nearly upstages Mr. Smith and Ms. Moynahan, and it is possible to foresee a day when his kind will tire of being pushed around by flesh-and-blood actors and directors. They will organize their own guilds, take creative control over their own movies and, eventually, turn their mechanical minds to film criticism. Now I'm scared. I hope it's not too late.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
RirenMar 19, 2007
A decent, if lopsided, thriller built around a weak story. The dialogue is uninspired and the acting is laughably bad, with every cast member showing one or two emotions in the entire movie, and flipping between them like they have switches A decent, if lopsided, thriller built around a weak story. The dialogue is uninspired and the acting is laughably bad, with every cast member showing one or two emotions in the entire movie, and flipping between them like they have switches built in their backs. I Robot's saving grace is its special effects, which are head and shoulders above what you see in a lot of movies, but will soon be outdated. These special effects are paid for by the copious products that are shamelessly placed and mentioned in the movie. A handful of times it feels more like a commercial than a story. Coupling its superficiality with its terrible character development, you are left with a movie that is only worth seeing for its few truly inspired special effects. See it on TV. Don't pay for it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
Compi24Nov 28, 2012
"I, Robot" is an almost-thought-provoking film with a complex lead protagonist and some clever visuals.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RayzorMooseNov 13, 2013
I, Robot humanizes itself.
I, Robot becomes a successful futuristic film do to its high quality special effects and very intriguing premise. Despite that though, the movie relies on its fair script that carries it passed a flat special
I, Robot humanizes itself.
I, Robot becomes a successful futuristic film do to its high quality special effects and very intriguing premise. Despite that though, the movie relies on its fair script that carries it passed a flat special effects movie.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CineAutoctonoJul 21, 2015
The movie is good but do not doubt any criticism that within 20 years we will have those robots, but if it happens it will fend for themselves , but we must always be honest with the futuristic films.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
YorkManFeb 4, 2016
Solid sci-fi whodunit.... Let down by dated special effects and the usual vision of the future that completely misses the technological advances which were made very soon after its release (let alone what could be accomplished by the film'sSolid sci-fi whodunit.... Let down by dated special effects and the usual vision of the future that completely misses the technological advances which were made very soon after its release (let alone what could be accomplished by the film's actual timeframe of 2054!).

Anyone who has watched any sci-fi Anime from the 80's/90's will see the 'twist' coming from about a light year away.... And in terms of acting, direction, cinematography, score etc, it's all just average.

Nothing stands out, good or bad, it's distinctly average. If you do want to see it, you won't be wasting your time, but there are far better (and much, much, much worse) sci-fi films released since the start of the Millenium.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
EpicLadySpongeFeb 15, 2016
Will Smith does his all in "I, Robot". The plot is very weak at some points during the movie... compared to how virtual this movie is and considering that most of the stuff are very cheesy and predictable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
FilipeNetoAug 22, 2021
I didn't have many expectations when I decided to see this film: the title didn't inspire me much and the presence of Will Smith, an actor I never really liked, didn't make me foresee anything grand either. In fact, this film is quite banalI didn't have many expectations when I decided to see this film: the title didn't inspire me much and the presence of Will Smith, an actor I never really liked, didn't make me foresee anything grand either. In fact, this film is quite banal in its essence, but it fulfills its main task, which is to entertain us without being able to misuse the time spent watching it.

The script is quite simple, in my opinion: winking at the noir genre, this film is a police investigation run by a skeptical, suspicious detective, somewhat neurotic in his way. Everything takes place in the year 2035 (only a few years from now): humanity has become fond of the uses of robots and uses them for all the jobs that prove to be tiring or repetitive. The crime is the seemingly impossible suicide of a leading scientist associated with robotics. From the beginning, the detective suspects murder, and the attitude of a robot that seems excessively rebellious. However, what his investigation will reveal is far more serious than he could have imagined.

The film is a crossover of elements that would seem unlikely at first glance: the CGI-laden sci-fi mixes with a main character who seems to have stepped out of “Sin City”, in her suspicious, pessimistic, gloomy attitude. The story is good enough to hold us to the end, even though it's pretty clear that it's all going to turn into a conspiracy where world domination will be up for grabs. There are some dissonant points, subplots that never develop, a world that seems to have evolved too quickly in less than fifty years (the film is from 2004, the story takes place in 2035) and which the film doesn't explore. It's not a movie for an audience that wants to think about what they've seen, just a movie to spend some time entertained. In that light, I think the production was very unambitious.

Will Smith is not an actor I particularly like. He's good for certain jobs, but he's not the kind of actor I would consider versatile or multifaceted. Here, the actor never seems to be really committed, and does a lazy, sloppy job, in a mix of “MIB” and “Wild Wild West”. He has presence, he has charisma, we can't deny him that, but he does little more than the basics. Bridget Moynnahan provides an interesting counterpoint to Smith, and manages to be more than a pretty face to support the lead actor. Bruce Greenwood is good, but he doesn't have the time or material to go beyond what he was. Alan Tudyk models his voice very well and adapts relatively well to the character, but the movie was not for him to shine.

On a technical level, the film bets almost entirely on a heavy and ubiquitous CGI, which dominates cinematography in a way that I found excessive, mainly because it was noted too much that everything was fake. It wasn't a quality, realistic, natural CGI. The sets and costumes work satisfactorily, but not surprising either. Alex Proyas' direction has proven to be adept at creating its own visual style and using cinematography to amplify the grandeur of what we are seeing. The soundtrack didn't satisfy me either.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews