Outbreak

Name: Outbreak
Genre: Action, Drama, Thriller
Released: March 10, 1995
Duration: 127 min
Rating: 65
Cast: Dustin Hoffman, Morgan Freeman, Rene Russo

1995

METASCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 20 Critics

See All

USER SCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 6 Ratings

See All

6.0

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

6.0	Your Score
6.0	User Score Mixed or average reviews based on 6 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Outbreak

Movie Details & Credits

Warner Bros. | Release Date: March 10, 1995

Starring: Dustin Hoffman, Morgan Freeman, Rene Russo

Summary: An Army doctor races to find a serum for a deadly virus in order to save a California town and its residents. The military wants to destroy it all to contain the disease. Can it really happen here?

Director: Wolfgang Petersen

Genre(s): Action, Drama, Thriller

Rating: R

Runtime: 127 min

See All Details and Credits

Awards & Rankings

43	#43 Best Movie of 1995
56	#56 Most Discussed Movie of 1995
60	#60 Most Shared Movie of 1995

Watch Now

Buy On

Stream On

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

100

San Francisco Chronicle - Mick LaSalle

In the end this is Hoffman's movie, and it's refreshing, finally, to see him not as an oddball or eccentric but as a decent, capable guy who is ultimately a lot more intense than most people. Read full review

Tampa Bay Times - Steve Persall

Outbreak is an expert what-if nightmare, albeit occasionally tempered by conventional distractions. [10 Mar 1995, p.2B]

Orlando Sentinel - Jay Boyar

Outbreak is sharp, sometimes-exploitative entertainment that does its job with great efficiency. Read full review

Philadelphia Inquirer - Steven Rea

No amount of accomplished acting and directorial skill can conceal the fundamental silliness of Outbreak's storyline, its inconsistencies, and the miraculous coincidences necessitated by its plot. [10 Mar 1995, p.3]

ReelViews - James Berardinelli

This movie is an entertaining and sometimes wildly-exhilarating ride. Read full review

Boston Globe - Jay Carr

it's an OK genre movie, providing an honest quota of scares and carried by Hoffman's way of alternating stoniness and warmth as the guy in the anticontamination suit. [10 Mar 1995, p.49]

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) - Rick Groen

After a great start, Wolfgang Petersen's intelligent medical thriller is infected by some nasty germs, resulting in the all-too-common Actionitis. [10 Mar 1995]

SEE ALL 20 REVIEWS

Write a Review

Negative:

User Reviews

Meth-dude

Jul 13, 2017

It's an actually really well made outbreak movie. Despite the clichés and the unnecessary happy ending, outbreak still managed to be quite entertaining and pretty fun to watch. The acting was great, the practical effects were great and the scenes were the virus is spreading are really wellIt's an actually really well made outbreak movie. Despite the clichés and the unnecessary happy ending, outbreak still managed to be quite entertaining and pretty fun to watch. The acting was great, the practical effects were great and the scenes were the virus is spreading are really well made and quite alarming. Outbreak might not be the best "outbreak"movie, but it's still watchable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

Spangle

Jul 24, 2017

While Wolfgang Petersen may not be the best director of all-time, it is likely impossible to argue that his films are anything less than entertaining. A seemingly chaotic mess of incredibly premises, briefly strong realizations of those premises, and then a descent into cliches that place itWhile Wolfgang Petersen may not be the best director of all-time, it is likely impossible to argue that his films are anything less than entertaining. A seemingly chaotic mess of incredibly premises, briefly strong realizations of those premises, and then a descent into cliches that place it strongly in the time period in which it was released, watching a Petersen film is a unique experience. It is like going into a time capsule to see how people from that year really lived and how films were made. Enter Outbreak. A precursor to films such as Contagion, Outbreak is about the spread of a virus from Zaire to America that threatens to wipe out the country in a matter of 48 hours. With a man known for taking chances and going against orders while being rogue/insubordinate regularly, his wife who is divorcing him due to his off-the-cuff style, a goofy assistant who dies part way through, a gung ho newcomer ready to save the day but still too green to be essential, and a military general antagonist, Outbreak is such a mid-1990s film, it almost hurts to watch. Fortunately, under the guidance of Petersen, he turns this quintessentially 1990s slice of cinema into a largely thrilling and engaging enterprise in spite of its flaws.

In writing about Outbreak, it is nearly impossible to gloss over the incredible cast at hand. Starring Dustin Hoffman as Doctor and Colonel Sam Daniels, Morgan Freeman as his boss, Rene Russo as his wife, Kevin Spacey as his assistant, Cuba Gooding Jr. as another assistant, Donald Sutherland as a Major General and Freeman's boss, and Patrick Dempsey as the idiot that spreads the virus, Outbreak is a film with a truly stacked cast. Across the board, the group can get a bit hammy and over-the-top at times but is largely as reliable as one would anticipate. That is a great thing for Outbreak considering how bad the dialogue can often become. Stilted, awkward, and seemingly impossible to have roll off the tongue, this group of Academy Award nominee/winning and/or veteran actors really power through this sloppy script and breathe life into every line. Somehow, watching this bunch go through a sea of cliches, plot conveniences, bloat, and terrible dialogue, remains watchable because of who is acting it all out.

As with any Wolfgang Petersen film, Outbreak manages to really grab viewers by the scruff of the neck and entertain you at all turns. A thrilling experience, Outbreak's haunting and ominous presence with dire predictions around every corner makes for a truly engaging watch. Anchored by assured direction from Petersen who knows his way around a thriller and a typically solid score from James Newton Howard, Outbreak is a film that may be cliched and contrived, but never ceases to be anything less than an entertaining and exciting film. The highlight of this element largely comes in the lab as the team works to identify this virus. What is it? What does it do? What brought it here? What stops it? These are all questions the film has somewhat revealed prior to the doctors piecing it together, but watching them piece together the clues and study the virus is unexpectedly gripping. Petersen paces these scenes terrifically and sprinkles them freely throughout the film. Always ominous and filled with tension, these scenes are where the film really lives up to the potential of its premise and also where the actors are given the best material work with.

Had the film focused solely on this element, it would have been a far tighter and engaging experience. Unfortunately, the film is often quite bloated. While perhaps not that lengthy, there is a shot in Zaire where the camera focuses on a witch doctor doing some sort of ritual. Later, Colonel Daniels asks to speak with the witch doctor only to learn he cannot. The film never comes back to this issue, in spite of dedicating a shot and a specific line of dialogue to him that further called attention to his presence. While perhaps not the most crucial moment, it does hint at the fact that Outbreak could have used another pass through in the editing room. There is some fat to trim here that did little else than extend its running time. A dogfight scene over the forests of suburban California is another source of love handles on the film with Sutherland's Major General McClintock going a tad bit rogue. Overlong with horrifically bad special effects, the scene is both implausible (how could this ever actually happen?) and unnecessary. It is a shot in the arm of unearned and laughably implausible tension that never justifies its presence in the film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

Broyax

Jun 14, 2017

Un gros thriller épidémique hollywoodien sous la houlette de l'expérimenté Wolgang Petersen qui dispense ici une mise en scène très efficace. Le scénario fait parfois de grands écarts rocambolesques malgré ses tentatives pour fournir une expérience plus ou moins réaliste et la guimauveUn gros thriller épidémique hollywoodien sous la houlette de l'expérimenté Wolgang Petersen qui dispense ici une mise en scène très efficace. Le scénario fait parfois de grands écarts rocambolesques malgré ses tentatives pour fournir une expérience plus ou moins réaliste et la guimauve syndicale est de rigueur ici et là, mais rien d'alarmant.

En fait, Dustin Hoffman que l'on voit rarement dans des triple A bien gras de ce genre, parvient à donner une énergie considérable à son personnage en dépit des clichés de l'écriture qu'il doit gérer : c'est la marque des (rares) grands acteurs de ce monde, toujours brillants, peu importent les conditions ! y compris face à la grue Rene Russo, l'épouvantable boulet du film.

Cependant, malgré Hoffman et malgré Freeman dans son rôle habituel d'homme d'honneur à l'insu de son plein gré, le film demeure une grosse machine hollywoodienne limitée et pataude, bête et maladroite : tout dans la gueule, rien dans le sac.

On se lasse donc assez vite de ce film-catastrophe qui tourne carrément à la pantalonnade vers la fin et qu'on oublie aussi vite que l'on peut, afin de s'aérer le cerveau un minimum.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 3 REVIEWS