X
- 2015
- Not Rated
- Abramorama
- 1 h 15 m
- 2015
- Not Rated
- Abramorama
- 1 h 15 m
Summary Heart of a Dog is a personal essay film that explores themes of love, death and language.
Directed By: Laurie Anderson
Written By: Laurie Anderson
- 2015
- Not Rated
- Abramorama
- 1 h 15 m
- 2015
- Not Rated
- Abramorama
- 1 h 15 m
Heart of a Dog
5.8
Where to Watch
Summary Heart of a Dog is a personal essay film that explores themes of love, death and language.
Directed By: Laurie Anderson
Written By: Laurie Anderson
Where to Watch
Top Cast
Metascore
Universal Acclaim
Based on 20 Critic Reviews
84
85% Positive
17 Reviews
17 Reviews
15% Mixed
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
Metascore
Universal Acclaim
Based on 20 Critic Reviews
84
85% Positive
17 Reviews
17 Reviews
15% Mixed
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
It sounds sentimental, icky, even, but Heart of a Dog sparkles with its creator's wisdom and droll philosophical insight.
Anderson says that as a child she dreamed of making something that had never been made before, and, with the help of some gifted artists and editors and camera-people, she has done it again — with bells on. The only thing that would make it more pleasurable would be Anderson narrating it in person.
User Score
Mixed or Average
Based on 10 User Ratings
5.8
60% Positive
6 Ratings
6 Ratings
20% Mixed
2 Ratings
2 Ratings
20% Negative
2 Ratings
2 Ratings
User Score
Mixed or Average
Based on 10 User Ratings
5.8
60% Positive
6 Ratings
6 Ratings
20% Mixed
2 Ratings
2 Ratings
20% Negative
2 Ratings
2 Ratings
There are better films than Laurie Anderson's 'Heart of a Dog'. But no other film packs such a condensed initial emotional punch. It is personal, so intimate yet so ambitious, and keeps its acute focus despite transitioning through so many subjects. All relevant, all mysterious and all scary.
First of all, Laurie Anderson is a performance and visual artist. And while its easy to smirk at its apparent self-indulgence and pretentiousness, every single word she utters is delivered with a perfectly balanced wry, never delving into satire, but most importantly, never victimizing herself. It is extremely empowering seeing a Septuagint widow baring her soul and focusing on remembering so many dark moments: the deaths of her husband Lou Reed and her apparently estranged mother, the downward spiral life and eventual death of her loved rat terrier Lolabelle, her near-fatal accident jumping in a pool, the world-changing 9/11 attacks and mostly her most twisted and deepest fantasies.
One of these, being right at the beginning, where she describes having "engineered" Lolabelle to be put into her stomach so that she could give birth to it. She is aware how sick that is, but she does not care. Every single word, musical hum and story she says is carefully written. She hides her desperation in her controlled tone, yet she is fascinated with death studying Buddhism, searching understatement and closure in old philosophies and eventually realizing that peace comes when you stop focusing on yourself. Indeed, there are no proper conclusions about life, death and love, because the truth is we do not know anything.
All in all, this is one of those films which simply want you to experience art in its purest form. The entire soundtrack is basically the film converted in audio format. It goes to show that Anderson is committed to challenging herself and putting her art before anything. This is a great film, the soundtrack is a masterpiece.
Report
I liked that this documentary film has quite an eery sound to it, a somehow supernatural, ethereal type of sound. The narrators voice sounds quite contemplative and so it has a laid back feel to it, while also sounding somewhat matter of fact as well. I struggled to think how to describe it visually but then the term scrapbook came to mind - it is like an artsy scrapbook of sorts, I say arty as there are elements of art the narrator has presumably worked on, which appear, like drawings, art installations and the like. Its a thoughtful documentary, covering some reasonably deep topics. There are some interesting quotes shown on screen.
As someone who likes dogs, I appreciated some of the sentiments and enjoyed seeing the many dogs that appear on screen. There are philosophical moments present (with people such as Kierkegaard mentioned) and indeed some of the themes are more about humans than pets or dogs. Overall I enjoyed this - its a slightly surreal watch but it was a nice one all the same. Oh and watching the Jack Russell play the keyboard was really cute! (yes I did just say that). I suppose, aside from grief, you could say its primarily about love and hope, which is obviously more positive. Would I recommend it? yes I would, primarily to other fans of dogs.
Report
It’s film as a fugue state, a Buddhist flow, a collection of memory fragments that drift together into a haunting evocation of Lola’s and Laurie’s intertwined lives.
Laurie Anderson condenses contemporary, human experience to the point where exterior and interior are made indistinguishable from one another.
While this alternately goofy, serious, lyrical and beguiling cine-essay serves primarily as a loving tribute to the memory of Anderson’s rat terrier, Lolabelle, its roving, free-associative structure brings together all manner of richly eccentric musings on the evasions of memory, the limitations of language and storytelling, the strangeness of life in a post-9/11 surveillance state, and the difficulty and necessity of coming to terms with death.
Heart Of A Dog is at turns a haunting, hilarious, muddled, disparate, and deeply emotional film about a woman, her dog, their bond, and the deaths that continue that haunt her.
This film was not only terrible and pretentious but contained elements which bordered on cruelty to animals. If going against vets advice to put a dog to sleep who was in pain and feeding the blind dog treats to bang a piano so you and your pretentious friends can laugh is art then you can keep it.
Report
If the art teacher from "Ghost World" decided to make a video tribute to her deceased pet, it would be this film, and the fact that I managed to sit through the full 75 minutes is a testament to my masochism. I actually had free admission; after it was over, I wanted my money back.
The film's whispered, sing-songy narration is an incoherent mess. Anderson engages in an intellectual name-dropping that's calculated to impress the type of person who desperately wants to be well-rounded but doesn't like to read. She quotes David Foster Wallace and Kierkegaard and Wittegenstein - though I'm sure she's really quoting Bartlett. What she quotes is devoid of context and, of course, depth. I suspect her greatest intellectual influences are actually the hits of acid she dropped back in the 1970s, or perhaps the pamphlets she picked up from the airport Krishnas.
She refers very liberally to the Tibetan Book of the Dead, the one work I'm sure she's read. I suppose the film is meant as some kind of personal essay; if so, it has no overarching argument. It's more a pastiche of totally disconnected musings. If you pepper your conversations with phrases like "getting locked into your thought flow," then this film just might be for you. For me personally, as she flashed words onto the screen with pictures of snow-covered trees, YouTube-style videos of her dog, and then tried to connect it all to 9/11 and the national security state, I began to wonder: am I being punked? Is somebody filming the audience right now? Is this film the abomination that it so clearly appears to be, or is this supposed to be a comedy?
"Heart of a Dog" is self-indulgent, excruciating New Age garbage. Instead of wasting your time on this monstrosity, do the following: watch a short film by Maya Deren; go to "The Intercept," and skim an article chosen at random; search online for "cute dogs," and play whatever videos pop up; and finally, go re-read the terrible poetry you wrote when you were in sixth grade. The fact that "Heart of a Dog" has a significantly higher rating than this year's "Victoria" I regard as evidence that most critics are frauds.
Report
Production Company
Canal Street Communications,
ARTE,
La Lucarne,
Field Office
Release Date Oct 21, 2015
Duration 1 h 15 m
Rating Not Rated
Genres
Tagline What do you see when you close your eyes?
Awards
Venice Film Festival
• 1 Win & 3 Nominations
Cinema Eye Honors Awards, US
• 1 Win & 3 Nominations
Gotham Awards
• 2 Nominations
