Call of Duty: WWII

 PC
User Score
4.3

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 968 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 274 out of 968
  2. Mixed: 207 out of 968
  3. Negative: 487 out of 968
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. silas1980
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    Well done Activision, after two years of successfully avoiding your yearly copy and paste but somehow simultaneously getting worse and worse I relented and bought this - mainly due to my affection of World at War. Well, it turns out that eight-year-old game is better in every single way. Congrats on the hype train, I bought a ticket - and now, after one day, I'm getting off. Abysmal.
  2. Kehferey
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Probably the worst call off duty game yet. The franchise is long dead but at least previous installments tried to add something new; black ops games had interesting plot twists in sp campaign, AW and IW had new gameplay mechanics. While none of these additions could redeem the franchise, this game decided to get rid of anything which might have made it interesting. Boring, not soProbably the worst call off duty game yet. The franchise is long dead but at least previous installments tried to add something new; black ops games had interesting plot twists in sp campaign, AW and IW had new gameplay mechanics. While none of these additions could redeem the franchise, this game decided to get rid of anything which might have made it interesting. Boring, not so interesting single player, multiplayer is pretty much the same as previous games minus wall running and vice versa. It is technically unremarkable and there are no no destructable environments. There is no reason to buy this game, you can go back to playing world at war.
    I am not even touching the subject of heinous business practices.
    Call of Duty is over for a long time and these guys are trying to sell its corpse every year.    … Expand
  3. pipadenis
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Well I am not in the habit of writing critic reviews but I just could no longer keep silence after playing this "gem" for couple of hours. First and foremost, this game is an utter representation of every single ailment the game industry has suffered over the last decade. Is just blatantly bad, with no light visible in sheer darkness. It plays and look as a game from 2008 at best, blurryWell I am not in the habit of writing critic reviews but I just could no longer keep silence after playing this "gem" for couple of hours. First and foremost, this game is an utter representation of every single ailment the game industry has suffered over the last decade. Is just blatantly bad, with no light visible in sheer darkness. It plays and look as a game from 2008 at best, blurry textures and almost no destructible environments. From the very first mission its hard not to notice how stingy the game budget was- the Normandy mission had me sent clearing 5 bunkers in a row without capturing the scale and magnitude of this highly important historical spectacle at all. This is not funny Activision, you should be utterly ashamed of releasing this piece of unheard of cash-grab in 2017. This is a theft of massive proportions. They just continue to lure gamers into this festival of utter mediocrity without having any care for the consequences they might face. This has to end.

    To sum things up

    PROS :
    Mm, no automatic health regenaration anymore, look for med-kits this time

    CONS:
    dismal visual quality ( blurry textures, weak physical model, bad SSAO quality and list can go on)
    extremely repetitive gameplay
    poor enemy AI
    loot-boxes, micro-transactions,
    no improvements whatsoever    … Expand
  4. jcdentonunatco
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Pretty well optimized, decent graphics. At first it seemed they overhauled the audio, and added realistic sfx finally. But then after I took my first shot, I realized nope it was still the same crappy gun sounds. I don't know why its so hard for a AAA studio to add good gun sounds.

    The gameplay feels basically identity to every other COD game, including the old original WW2 ones. And    Pretty well optimized, decent graphics. At first it seemed they overhauled the audio, and added realistic sfx finally. But then after I took my first shot, I realized nope it was still the same crappy gun sounds. I don't know why its so hard for a AAA studio to add good gun sounds.

    The gameplay feels basically identity to every other COD game, including the old original WW2 ones. And that is a major problem. The originals were good....for their time. But its 2017 and games have evolved since then, but not COD. The physics engine is poor, the ragdoll effects are nonexistent. The death animations feel the same as all the other COD games, and it completely kills the game. When you blow up a group of enemies they just slouch over and die in their scripted death animations, instead of going flying or ragdolling. The gunplay is too fast and feels like the character has no "weight" to him. Other than a few scenes, it doesnt feel like you are really in WW2, because so many scenes are just completely unrealistic. Like using sniper rifle to shoot 60 enemies in 5 minutes. Or using a flak gun to shoot down 10 planes in under a minute. Or the endless waves of germans running at you with no intelligence. The explosions are very pixelated.

    The voice acting is okay, but some of the lines are cheesy or out of place for the scene. For the amount of money they spent on this game, there really is no excuse for how generic it is. The engine feels massively outdated and arcadey.    … Expand
  5. Sabardo
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Yet again another COD that doesn't provide anything else than piece of garbade cash grab game. These FPS series are so milked dry that they should just cancel the whole genre for few years.
  6. IMPACT_XO
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    I joined here only in order to put the rating 1/10... Very bad. Activision has learned nothing. Best textures as always.
    I have no words how bad this game is
    Best regards, IMPACT.
  7. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that dont fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  8. Filaton
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    A twitch shooter with lootboxes, dlc and an alternate history WW2 theme. I mean, who wouldn't want to play as a black woman in service of the Wehrmacht.
  9. riverkev95
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Una correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente queUna correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente que paga por mejores armas con la gente que juega sin pagar mas por el videojuego es terrible.
    A pesar de sus puntos positivos anteriormente descritos, lo que mas choca en este juego es el hecho de que se hayan implementado todas las políticas mas nefastas que existen actualmente en el mundo de los videojuegos, aprovechandose así de su inmensa base de usuarios fieles a la saga.
    Entre estas políticas nefastas puedo mencionar que el juego viene recortado de lanzamiento (Prueba de esto es el DLC ya anunciado para enero de 2018), las lootboxes que están tan de moda en casi todos los videojuegos pero en este juego son implementadas de una forma mas descarada ya que tú puedes ver como los otros jugadores reciben sus premios tras comprar una cajita de estas, esto va acorde al matchmaking que relacione jugadores que no han gastado dinero extra en el videojuego con personas que gastan un montón y por lo tanto consiguen mejores armas en tu cara, lo cual provoca un online totalmente desbalanceado, por no decir que roto.
    En conclusión, este juego mejora algunos aspectos del juego del año anterior, pero la forma tan descarada en que Activision gana dinero de sus usuarios en este juego no me deja ponerle una mejor nota que "1".
    (Lo mismo que dije en la versión de consolas, pero esta versión tenían que haberla trabajado mucho mas)    … Expand
  10. Kauzer
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Another retexture edition. Stolen from BF 1 elements like bayonet charge and Operation mode did no help. Gameplay is booring coz of too small maps and lack of teamplay elements between players. Game engine is very old and game looks like same. Theres no destruction, terraforming and another cool modern features. In my opinion this game is not worth that price, it should be much cheaper.Another retexture edition. Stolen from BF 1 elements like bayonet charge and Operation mode did no help. Gameplay is booring coz of too small maps and lack of teamplay elements between players. Game engine is very old and game looks like same. Theres no destruction, terraforming and another cool modern features. In my opinion this game is not worth that price, it should be much cheaper. Probably if devs will sell SP and MP separate i will buy SP only edition.… Expand
  11. Sadergator
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    Probably the biggest disappointment to a CoD game I've ever seen. With Infinite warfare, I at least assumed ahead of time is was going to be terrible.. but with CoD WWII, I was actually pulling for them pretty hard for it to be a good game.

    Severely let down.

    Save your money.
  12. lac61087
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    *This review can only be unlocked by buying Micro transactions*

    *Thank you for buying our Micro transactions review now unlocked* Don't buy this game, only buy if you support items behind paywalls and a FPS formula we have seen many times before, although Activision have tried to make a solid campaign i cannot support this micro-shafting business practice we are seeing a lot in    *This review can only be unlocked by buying Micro transactions*

    *Thank you for buying our Micro transactions review now unlocked*

    Don't buy this game, only buy if you support items behind paywalls and a FPS formula we have seen many times before, although Activision have tried to make a solid campaign i cannot support this micro-shafting business practice we are seeing a lot in gaming lately. So if you do buy this game you are technically an enemy since your money is helping cripple this industry.

    The only way these big corporations will understand is if we hit them where it hurts....the wallet.

    No more lootboxes, no more micro-shafting in full priced AAA games.    … Expand
  13. RagingKilledMe
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    What can you expect from an AAA title featuring the second World War in 2017?
    - Realism
    - An educated view on WWII - Emotion - A fitting, well-layered story - An enthrilling, horrifying campaign that will leave you breathless and create nightmares What does CoD WWII give you? - A cinematic War - A bland view on WWII - Stereotypes and 'major' conflicts between soldiers the player    What can you expect from an AAA title featuring the second World War in 2017?
    - Realism
    - An educated view on WWII
    - Emotion
    - A fitting, well-layered story
    - An enthrilling, horrifying campaign that will leave you breathless and create nightmares

    What does CoD WWII give you?
    - A cinematic War
    - A bland view on WWII
    - Stereotypes and 'major' conflicts between soldiers the player can't care less about
    - A story that doesn't get enough build up, doesn't surprise you and is very predictable until the end
    - A 7 hour campaign that does nothing but frustrate you; there's nothing new here, you've seen this before

    CoD: WWII does well in showing off cinematics and has solid and fun gameplay, but stops right there. Because the story is so bland this game could just as well be another plastic looking game where you're fighting some made-up terrorists like in some previous CoD-titles. CoD isn't trying to make you live through WWII, but trying to rob you of not only your money but also a hope of getting closer to WWII. The producers haven't done their research, they didn't care enough about a solid campaign. But hey, there's a nazi zombie mode!    … Expand
  14. Benzen1999
    Nov 9, 2017
    0
    This game is historically inaccurate. Germans running around on Omaha beach with russian smg's, come on! Multiplayer is the worst thing though. The lack of dedicated servers is terrible. The maps are small and boring. They float with cheaters and people get disconnected and loose xp's. BF1 ripoff at certain points, laser dotted scopes and so on, that's just hopeless for a WW2 game..This game is historically inaccurate. Germans running around on Omaha beach with russian smg's, come on! Multiplayer is the worst thing though. The lack of dedicated servers is terrible. The maps are small and boring. They float with cheaters and people get disconnected and loose xp's. BF1 ripoff at certain points, laser dotted scopes and so on, that's just hopeless for a WW2 game..

    They should have used their efforts more on the multiplayer part and have left the zombie part out - who plays that **** anyway?!    … Expand
  15. TwiTu
    Nov 9, 2017
    0
    This is only about the singleplayer portion, which is so bad that I wont even bother with multiplayer.

    It is heavily scripted. Any CoD game was, but this time they thought the player is unable to do even the simplest things and have to rip him out of immersion every few minutes. Your squad mates suddenly pop up in front of you, even though you think you lead the attack and then you    This is only about the singleplayer portion, which is so bad that I wont even bother with multiplayer.

    It is heavily scripted. Any CoD game was, but this time they thought the player is unable to do even the simplest things and have to rip him out of immersion every few minutes.

    Your squad mates suddenly pop up in front of you, even though you think you lead the attack and then you almost shoot them, because you think they are the enemy, since they logically cant be in front of you.

    The sound is so bad that you think your own character screaming is someone else behind you. Or you hear a German talking in front of you, which makes you think theres still one around, but then there actually is no enemy around anymore.

    Explosions are bitmaps. Yes, you heard me, bitmaps. The game looks very good otherwise, but they use ugly bitmaps that always look the same for explosions. I tried to find a setting to fix this, but there isnt one. Everything is on max, yet you still see this crap.

    You always get ripped out of immersion by cutscenes, which you never know when you control them or dont control them. Plus they add silly quicktime events to them, which is an absolute no-go in this time and age.

    This game is very hard to predict either. One time it forces you along on train tracks and you cant do anything else than press one key to go forward, then the other time it suddenly expects logical and independent decisions from you, you dont expect at all and then mess up.

    And then theres the microtransactions (ads), massive lack of realism & authenticity and the display of such blatant stereotypes, that the cringe level was just too much, because you think youre playing a character in an extremely low budget movie that has to hold up an ad every few minutes, so that this **** movie is even able to afford this crappy budget.

    To put it simple: The game feels worse than a game from the 2000s with the graphics (mainly) from 2015, and sometimes from 1994. Its an insult to gamers in any way. Period. So its no surprise again, that bought people (not gamers) are rating it that highly.    … Expand
  16. carnivorCactae
    Nov 9, 2017
    0
    CoD WW2 is a modern CoD.
    And I mean this in its worst terms!
    This game is the best fake-gamer-detector there is. Just look at the positive Reviews who can't even see whats wrong with this game! The game takes control away from you at every step, and interrupts your gameflow so often, you'll keep asking yourself why the heck you are even wasting your time looking at all these    CoD WW2 is a modern CoD.
    And I mean this in its worst terms!

    This game is the best fake-gamer-detector there is.
    Just look at the positive Reviews who can't even see whats wrong with this game!

    The game takes control away from you at every step,
    and interrupts your gameflow so often,
    you'll keep asking yourself why the heck you are even wasting your time
    looking at all these fancy movies,
    when the gameplay will get ripped away from you after 10 minutes!

    Flashing objective-markers shoved down your throat
    and Ads for microtransactions appear in the middle of your game
    (in form of Lootboxes!) !!!

    Its a "game" just made for lazy slobs who want to watch cut-scenes with easy button-mashing inbetween.    … Expand
  17. 2chill
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    A real glittery coated turd of a game. More turd appears as the glittery coating wears off after the first few seconds of gameplay and within minutes the whole turd has presented itself to you.
  18. Benden
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    The worst Call of Duty game so far, and I've played them all on my different PCs.
    Graphics are good, sound is ok but gameplay is the worst I've seen. Damn heavily scripted and bugged : on several missions you could die with no reasons. Boring : the game is not even damn fun to play and short for the single player part, really short.
    Also game mechanics are so weird : smgs and even    The worst Call of Duty game so far, and I've played them all on my different PCs.
    Graphics are good, sound is ok but gameplay is the worst I've seen. Damn heavily scripted and bugged : on several missions you could die with no reasons. Boring : the game is not even damn fun to play and short for the single player part, really short.
    Also game mechanics are so weird : smgs and even assault rifles requiring half a charger to kill a man, only headsots will save you from constant weapon reload. Scenarios dont make a sense : stukas runs in 1945 ? Weapons : PPSH that soviet smg being used by germans ? Tank battle: was a pain to play, not fun and unrealistic : Sherman should penetrate a panzer 4 from the front, even more those later sherman models (firefly in the game it seems...), same with that mission were you play a P-47 fighter plane : uncontrollable and boring.
    Crap, this sh*t just makes me want to play Medal of honor allied assault they were largely inspired by made ... 12 years ago...    … Expand
  19. hulagu
    Nov 22, 2017
    0
    just stay away this junk
    and ask for refund if possible
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap? How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap? How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap? How much money are professional    just stay away this junk
    and ask for refund if possible
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?
    How much money are professional reviewers being paid to praise this crap?    … Expand
  20. warZ3bra
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    Former World top 10 of blops 1 here.
    Never again will i purchase a call of duty game, the loot box and gun variant system completely ruins the online experience these days, used to be all the best unlocks and attachments were behind challenges, now it is behind random gambing. single player sucks it is the exact same stuff being pumped out annually now for over 10 years.
    not to mention    Former World top 10 of blops 1 here.
    Never again will i purchase a call of duty game, the loot box and gun variant system completely ruins the online experience these days, used to be all the best unlocks and attachments were behind challenges, now it is behind random gambing. single player sucks it is the exact same stuff being pumped out annually now for over 10 years.
    not to mention the engine still sucks, sound design is woeful, online maps are too small, and the division system is completely unbalanced. Get it together activision.    … Expand
  21. PavelCZ1982
    Nov 24, 2017
    0
    CoD WWII is the worst game from whole series. Graphics is more or less good, but single player is a huge Joke. You just walk through tunnel. AI is super stupid, no invention at all. In comparison to Battlefield 1 this game is trash. Multiplayer is lagging, small maps, no vehicle support, boring environment. I do not recommend this game. Rather buy BF1 with all DCLs for 30 dollars on Black Friday.
  22. ibarix
    Nov 24, 2017
    0
    You gotta be joking me. Where do I even start? I don't think I'll be able to finish the game cause fking textures won't load properly. Fix your **** Graphics ok but gameplay... OMG. Whose retarded decision is to have medkits in 2017? Also I never have ammo, machine guns shoot too fast unnecessarily. Have you ever fired a machinegun, devs? The sound is a joke. Did you developers ever heardYou gotta be joking me. Where do I even start? I don't think I'll be able to finish the game cause fking textures won't load properly. Fix your **** Graphics ok but gameplay... OMG. Whose retarded decision is to have medkits in 2017? Also I never have ammo, machine guns shoot too fast unnecessarily. Have you ever fired a machinegun, devs? The sound is a joke. Did you developers ever heard a gun fire? This game sounds like everyone is shooting a fking bb gun. The game takes me by the hand and directs me what to do like I'm retarded. The first time I saw "reload" on my screen I was like - wtf, i still have 8 bullets left... When you're hurt, there is no need your whole god damn screen turn red and can't see **** Where is the immersion? PLEASE, play again COD 1 and compare it's sound and tension/thrill to this piece of **** Graphics good when working, gameplay 0. Develop a fking game, not a movie. I'm glad I didn't pay for this crap.

    Update: deinstalling the game... The mission with the tanks was too much - are you fking retarded, developers? Those are the worst tank controls I have ever experienced in my life! And people say that plane controls in later missions are even worse! Whoever "designed" this retarded controls scheme is a **** moron and should be fired effective immediately. OMG. I'm updating the score to 0.    … Expand
  23. isg1983
    Nov 30, 2017
    0
    Worst campaign ever in COD history. I can't believe people bashed them for IW's campaign which was at least had the tempo of the old campaigns, this one is a 10 minute sketchwork of a plot. Embarrassing.
  24. CaptainPuGDoG
    Nov 16, 2017
    4
    Spend 40+ hours
    Story 2/10 So stuipid history,where Great America try to win war,a lot of hero doing dont many actions don't make sense,just 2 or 3 interesting missions, all other is a ****
    Mp 5/10 After 10 or 15 hours,play it is very boring and there is not any interest
  25. nikt45
    Nov 20, 2017
    2
    Very low game quality ( overall ) and old engine, stupid campaign no war climate, dramatically low quality Polish dubbing. I back to BF1 and write this line only because need 150 character to put this message.
  26. Jayme_lara
    Nov 23, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes para todo, asi describiria este Call o Duty la diversion y dificultad se ve opacada con tanta caja de botin, esto sumado al escandalo de las patentes de Activision, en realidad me decepciona ver como otra franquicia se cae a trozos por la avaricia de otra compañia mas
  27. micgus
    Dec 4, 2017
    0
    boring, glitchy, nothing interesting - trying to make u feel close to ur squad mates but presenting no real opportunity to make choices on how u wanna interact with them - a common theme along the game on multiple levelsplanes. no price.
    and those r the good bits
    out of immersion loot boxes, disgusting social ingenereing for which activision is famous for - making u watch ppl open those    boring, glitchy, nothing interesting - trying to make u feel close to ur squad mates but presenting no real opportunity to make choices on how u wanna interact with them - a common theme along the game on multiple levelsplanes. no price.
    and those r the good bits
    out of immersion loot boxes, disgusting social ingenereing for which activision is famous for - making u watch ppl open those boxes in order to buy some urself, prolly using that multipler matchmaking tool to make ur life hell till u buy lootboxes that they said they wouldnt use like any1 would ever believe something like that.    … Expand
  28. kuhggr
    Nov 20, 2020
    1
    America best Axis and Soviet bad. There is no Eastern front and Pacific War. Tank and plane mechanics are too bad. HP system is like Call of Duty 1. But face textures are good.(Sorry for A2 English)
  29. TitaniumDragon
    Oct 24, 2019
    4
    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in    Call of Duty: World War II is a generic FPS shooter set during World War II. From the landing at Normandy to the push to the Rhine, you and your band of brothers™ are off to save the free world from the Nazis. Through trials and trevails, you will yadda yadda.

    World War II games have a major flaw: we already know what happens. The course of the war is already set, because it’s based in history. While the actual particular events can be made up, we know the general flow of things, and so it is very hard to surprise the audience in any meaningful way. Moreover, the audience rather EXPECTS to see many things out of a World War II game, such as the assault on the beaches of Normandy, or the Battle of the Bulge in a snowy forest around Christmas, so we not only know what is going to happen, we expect to see it.

    What this means, however, is that it is very hard to get all that attached to the events – it’s literally history. The characters in the game are all affable enough, but they could be… well, anyone, really. They’re meant to be stand ins for all the men who fought during World War II, and they work in that job, but at the same time, it all just kind of feels like we’re going through the motions at this point.

    This is compounded by the fact that World War II needs to play in a certain way to be historically accurate, which means that the weapons we use are not going to be particularly exciting or novel. They are a little bit clunkier than modern day FPS weapons by intent, and that’s fine, but the end result is that we’re playing a FPS using rather standard weapons in a standard war that cannot surprise us in any way.

    And for some reason, this game contains collectibles, which, if you go searching for them, interrupt the gameplay for no good reason. Why are these in a game like this? The heroic actions at least made sense – saving someone or accepting someone’s surrender seems like reasonable optional things that slot nicely into the core gameplay – but searching for random items in levels is just not fun in a game like this.

    The net result of all of this is a game that is like a bowl of oatmeal – it’s fine, there’s nothing WRONG with oatmeal, but we know exactly what we’re getting, and sadly, there’s no cinnamon in sight to spice it up, so it’s a bit bland and watery.

    So it is with this game. The controls are a fine example of modern FPS design, running around, sliding, crouching or going prone, walking up behind enemies for stealth kills, climbing up waist-high walls by jumping at them – but there’s nothing added here to spice things up. The story has only one possible way it can go, the particulars aren’t strong enough to really make me care about the characters (though at least I can remember their personalities), and the gameplay is bog standard.

    It’s kind of impossible to recommend something like this, but it was not bad to go through. It was just kind of forgettable.

    As for the multiplayer… honestly, I thought it was pretty bad. I’ve never really liked super low time to kill, and the multiplayer has that in spades. I actually did surprisingly well in the small amount of it I played – I saw a lot of other new players, probably because of the Humble Monthly – but at the same time, it never really engaged me all that much. Getting shot at kills you almost faster than you can react a great deal of the time, and the same applies to shooting at enemies, and the characters are all pretty generic, without anything to spice them up or make them all that interesting or distinctive. It is what it is.

    The zombies was honestly even worse. It’s amazing to me how, after Left 4 Dead did coop zombies so well, companies continue to make games that are vastly worse. This is just a horde shooting coop multiplayer mode with a single map (well, unless you fork over more money for more maps) with a series of things you need to do on it which aren’t explained very well. It was just kind of a mess to play, and I did not have a lot of fun playing it. The gameplay was only alright and the confusion about what I was supposed to do made it more annoying than anything else.

    For a game with such nice graphics, it felt strangely unambitious. Black Ops 3 at least tried to do some interesting things; this just kind of felt like the most generic shooter possible. It wasn’t bad, but it never rose to the level of good. It was just kind of bland.    … Expand
  30. DubtCZ
    Nov 29, 2017
    4
    Censored **** So much stealth-like gameplay. Nothing interesting. Strong Female Character!
    Multiplayer is same like always.
    Does it worth a buy: If you are blind sheep - YES
    If you wanted authentic to WW2 - NO
  31. wuudogg
    Dec 23, 2017
    0
    This game is not going to bring back that loving feeling from the CODs of old. This is not the nostalgia that you were looking for. PC version multiplayer is trash ridden full of aimbotters and wall hackers. Sledgehammer / Hacktivision have truly done nothing to address the problem. SHG has added more worthless items to crates to further dilute the microtransaction loot pool. Quests areThis game is not going to bring back that loving feeling from the CODs of old. This is not the nostalgia that you were looking for. PC version multiplayer is trash ridden full of aimbotters and wall hackers. Sledgehammer / Hacktivision have truly done nothing to address the problem. SHG has added more worthless items to crates to further dilute the microtransaction loot pool. Quests are broken. Headquarters is empty. Steam reports shows that the daily player base is down 40% in 30 days. This just after releasing an update for holiday event. If money is burning a hole in your pocket, light it on fire as it will be more enjoyable than this suffering with this hot mess.… Expand
  32. allwititnowsuck
    Sep 13, 2018
    0
    A cheap rehash of Medal of Honor Allied Assault made out of jealousy of Battlefield 1's success,this series is already beaten to the ground,the only series more stupid and repetive i can think of is Grand Theft Auto because of forced controversies.Call of Duty on the other hand is playing safe all the time not trying anything new really. All guns in the game sounds like airsoft guns, theA cheap rehash of Medal of Honor Allied Assault made out of jealousy of Battlefield 1's success,this series is already beaten to the ground,the only series more stupid and repetive i can think of is Grand Theft Auto because of forced controversies.Call of Duty on the other hand is playing safe all the time not trying anything new really. All guns in the game sounds like airsoft guns, the violence is so tuned down it makes me wonder why is it 18+?Because of zombies or killing?With violence tuned down this low it should atleast 16+ unless we are still living in 90s and everything with a smallest drop of blood makes the game 18+....
    Don't even get me started on the upcoming Black Ops 4 this is pure embarrassment,jumping on a bandwagon of one weakest genre's of video games battle royal. If that won't teach them something then there is no hope for either series nor FPS genre as a whole.    … Expand
  33. gunnaholic
    Apr 21, 2018
    0
    I don't review games ever, but this game is such an utterly infuriating steaming pile that I couldn't not review this thing. Where to start? I guess the short list of pros.

    - The player card customization options and emotes give the game just a bit of personality. - It looks decent. - The quartermaster missions add more of a reason to keep playing - The zombies is fun for a few    I don't review games ever, but this game is such an utterly infuriating steaming pile that I couldn't not review this thing. Where to start? I guess the short list of pros.

    - The player card customization options and emotes give the game just a bit of personality.
    - It looks decent.
    - The quartermaster missions add more of a reason to keep playing
    - The zombies is fun for a few playthroughs if you have friends
    - Gun game is pretty fun
    - It was nice to see them bring back War, which was introduced in WaW, although it's not worth playing for reasons stated later.
    - I kinda like what they were doing with divisions, but they're almost pointless and the system needs a major overhaul.
    - It's fun to get in a custom game with friends and do stupid modes like shovels only
    The cons

    - This game still has that basic CoD formula that hasn't had any major changes since WaW. It's painfully outdated and CoD will need to really pull something crazy if they want the series to have a future.
    - While the game does look good, it goes for a generic "look realistic" art style that takes no creativity, and is therefore lifeless and void of almost any personality.
    - The map balancing is completely broken to the point that is needs to be scrapped to be redeemed. The spawnpoints for every base game map is the same layout: a small piece of cover with three chokepoints, a left mid and right. If you can wipe the other team and get to their spawn at the beginning of the match, you have won the match. The enemy team will be cowering behind their spawn cover because they can't move anywhere because your team already has peak advantage on them and unless they have incredible aim will get outgunned. Just run back and forth, and you win. If somehow you get two teams who suck equally, this won't happen. But it's in situations like these that the poorly designed map flow is highlighted the most, as spawns seem to happen randomly, making team coordination of any kind almost impossible. The map flow is so broken that I almost think that Treyarch were going for a spawn trap based game. This makes any team based mode with respawn essentially unplayable. So you should just stick to FFA and S&D right? Then you will see the...
    - Horrible gun balancing. Each class of weapon should have their own strong points and weak points that make them balanced, SMGs having short to mid range low time to kill, LMGs providing long range automatic fire, the assault rifles being a balance, and the shotgun and sniper having extreme short and long range capabilities, respectively. The main problem with the gun balancing here is the LMGs. They combine below AR recoil, above AR damage and SMG time to kill. They render the ARs and SMGs existences pointless. Shotguns in games like these are notorious for being hard to balance and therefore being absurdly OP. In WWII, they are almost useless. The range on these things is, no exaggeration, no more than a 10 foot one shot kill. Unless you're a hyper cautious building lurker, you won't have any success with these. The snipers are the only guns in this game that were well balanced, although it's really difficult to mess up sniper balancing. In short, this game needs a complete balance overhaul to work at all.
    - The cashgrab DLCs. Both of the DLCs as of writing this (Resistance and War Machine) add 3 new maps, a new war map and a zombies map. Keep in mind this game has 9, count them 9, base game multiplayer maps. Compare this to MW3's 16 base game maps or BO2's 14. Which means after you pay 60 dollars for base game and 30 dollars in DLC, only then do you get up to the content that previous installments of the game had. It baffles me that they can get away with this. As of the last time I checked, on PC you could only buy the 60 dollar season pass for some reason, and it was the only platform that they did this to. As if PC CoD wasn't dead enough as it is.
    - I don't own any of the DLCs, but from what I've heard the multiplayer maps vary widely in terms of quality and the zombies maps are garbage.
    - I don't like the menu system at all, it's a pain to navigate.
    In conclusion, this game is an irredeemable, pathetically lazy excuse for an AAA game that would be ridiculed if it was released by anyone else under any other name. You could spend your 60 dollars on a myriad on compelling, creative indie games that aren't devoid of any life or personality like this worthless garbage heap of a game.    … Expand
  34. FOKq
    Oct 31, 2018
    1
    Разработчику, который делал миссию с танками, я бы вырвал руки и засунул их прямо в ***!!!
    Единица, только 1, большего эта игра недостойна
  35. Sjw-remover
    Dec 19, 2020
    0
    Worst world war 2 game ever. Campaign only features american side. Characters are forgettable. Doesnt have good soundtrack. Multiplayer is boring and infested with lootboxes.
    Players demanded WW2 game after getting tired of garbage futuristic games. This could have been good and refreshing WW2 game if it was done right. At least they tried.
    Advanced Warfare 2 would have been better than this.
  36. SefanMucha
    Sep 12, 2020
    0
    The person who designed tank controlls should get fired, the person who accepted them should never again get a job in gaming industry, the person who tested them and still accepted it should never get a job anywhere- should be homeless and die of starvation. That controls are the most incompetent thing I have ever seen and believe me I have seen a lot. Those controlls alone made meThe person who designed tank controlls should get fired, the person who accepted them should never again get a job in gaming industry, the person who tested them and still accepted it should never get a job anywhere- should be homeless and die of starvation. That controls are the most incompetent thing I have ever seen and believe me I have seen a lot. Those controlls alone made me uninstall the whole game and stop playing it.… Expand
  37. D_e_l_u_x
    Nov 21, 2020
    0
    ...................The lack of historical accuracy is offensive to history!
  38. nanddo
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    No dedicated servers? no physics? a 4 years old graphic engine? waiting to for Battlefield WWII to play a propper WWII game. This microtransactions and small boxes economy engine is going out of hand. If you pay so much for a game should be included with everything. And if the make it a pay to win with no dedicated servers, with no physics, sell it at least at 15 £.
  39. matdevine21
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes. My main problem with this supposed next generation    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes.
    My main problem with this supposed next generation of maps is that they are no different than last gen, where is the dynamic settings? why cant there be a physical changes to the map randomly i.e. a battle on a sinking battleship or a war around you with buildings exploding? its just lazy and derriviative but compared to what Activision charges for season pass / map packs its just insulting!

    Loot crates are obviously there, disgusting to have them opening on normandy batlefield in your "social area" and visable to all, there really isnt an "enough money earned here" is there!

    Overall I feel more down on the franchise now than ever before, it needs to go away and have a high level rethink about COD's future as come next year, COD will not be a pre order or even a day one purchase for me!    … Expand
  40. matsy80
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    Verry bad game for PC, Hackers, aimbotters, buggs like no rewards after battle, continuesly disconnecting,...... i can contuniue with this but all i can say is don't buy this game on PC, you will lose your money and you will never be happy about it. Verry bad grafics even if your rig is capable to run the game at full settings. If you set at full setting you will get FPS drops andVerry bad game for PC, Hackers, aimbotters, buggs like no rewards after battle, continuesly disconnecting,...... i can contuniue with this but all i can say is don't buy this game on PC, you will lose your money and you will never be happy about it. Verry bad grafics even if your rig is capable to run the game at full settings. If you set at full setting you will get FPS drops and disconnect or even crash the game.
    No customer support at all, no news from devs, only console updates, no pc updates. Its a verry bad game, and its really not worth buying, if you want to lose money buy it!    … Expand
  41. lakings78
    Nov 12, 2017
    2
    First Call of Duty I've purchased new off the shelf in over 5 years. Nothing has changed. Still no dedicated servers, hit detection is horrible. The game rewards camping and mindless running around---there's no real tactics to be had. As of today, full game features are still unavailable and connectivity issues and lag are still plaguing the game. The game has a decent campaign, butFirst Call of Duty I've purchased new off the shelf in over 5 years. Nothing has changed. Still no dedicated servers, hit detection is horrible. The game rewards camping and mindless running around---there's no real tactics to be had. As of today, full game features are still unavailable and connectivity issues and lag are still plaguing the game. The game has a decent campaign, but that's where it stops at delivering anything good. The multiplayer is just horribly frustrating. Average scores for players are in the negative. The hit detection is what bothers me the most. Nothing like unloading half a magazine into an opposing player only for them to shoot you and kill you like you were shooting blanks. The kill cam shows most your hits that you thought were hitting...weren't there...which tells you exactly that the netcode is not up to par. Just another re-skinned COD game, save your money. Better yet, if you must have it, get it on the secondary market to put a ding in Activision/Sledgehammer's profit margins. I only wish I could get a refund, as I stupidly purchased the digital download collector's edition. Waste of $100 that evidently can't be refunded. At least Gamestop would give me about 50% of the game's value back. I just love how the official reviews are still beaming, except that now it's down to 75 on metacritic. Heed my warning...save your money, Activision and Sledgehammer games have failed the casual gamer. I'm sure the MLG, Monster Chugging Fan Boys will still love this game because it's the same twitchy trash that;s been re-skinned every year. I actually am hoping for a bust on this one so severe that there are layoffs for the developers that worked on it. They clearly do not know what they are doing.… Expand
  42. k_flint
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    The single player campaign is mediocre. The one thing I couldn't get out of my head - I've seen all this before. It's like the developers took all the stuff that worked in old WW2 shooters and put it in one VERY short campaign. The redeeming side to it are the good looking cut-scenes in which the voice actors did a good job, though the script was half-assed. The campaign is the only goodThe single player campaign is mediocre. The one thing I couldn't get out of my head - I've seen all this before. It's like the developers took all the stuff that worked in old WW2 shooters and put it in one VERY short campaign. The redeeming side to it are the good looking cut-scenes in which the voice actors did a good job, though the script was half-assed. The campaign is the only good thing in this game, at least I had some fun with it. If it was twice as long, I would give this game a 7.
    As for the multiplayer... It is an underwhelming experience.

    This is the last time I had bought a CoD game. I hoped returning to the roots would save the franchise, but I was wrong. RIP    … Expand
  43. Rachaque
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    I was enjoying the game until the Collateral Damage mission. It is unplayable on PC; life is too short to get this frustrated because of a video game. The controls on PC in this mission seems like a very poor port from consoles. Deleted after about 40% of the game.
  44. BRubble
    Nov 11, 2017
    1
    Well this is pretty standard practice for a CoD game.... devs and publisher lie through their teeth with the standard generic hyped grocery list of "features" and don't bother to follow through, they know the kids will buy it regardless. The devs could've added a "Liberate Bert and Ernie on Sesame Street" level and the gamers would believe it to be historically accurate, heck it would beWell this is pretty standard practice for a CoD game.... devs and publisher lie through their teeth with the standard generic hyped grocery list of "features" and don't bother to follow through, they know the kids will buy it regardless. The devs could've added a "Liberate Bert and Ernie on Sesame Street" level and the gamers would believe it to be historically accurate, heck it would be as believable as the rest of this mess. An utter disgrace to those who served.
    Yes CoD is "going back to its roots" indeed....cut, paste, rinse, repeat and caaaaash in. The saddest aspect isnt the less than mediocre game itself, it's that the same people who feel betrayed by this abysmal trash will still get in line next year for the next enchanting installment with cash in hand.
    Weak.    … Expand
  45. Velgar
    Nov 24, 2017
    0
    CoD is the representation of everything wrong with the game industry. Multiplayer focused, loot boxes, micro-transactions, season pass, dlcs, **** Activision, Destiny 2 is already the best selling game of 2017 and it came out in September, great first-party exclusives like Breath of the Wild and Horizon Zero Dawn celebrate 4 or 5 million copies sold, CoD sells 20 mil in a bad year, whyCoD is the representation of everything wrong with the game industry. Multiplayer focused, loot boxes, micro-transactions, season pass, dlcs, **** Activision, Destiny 2 is already the best selling game of 2017 and it came out in September, great first-party exclusives like Breath of the Wild and Horizon Zero Dawn celebrate 4 or 5 million copies sold, CoD sells 20 mil in a bad year, why people keep supporting this crap? It's just a reskin of the same game for the past decade, when they aren't trying to copy other games.… Expand
  46. Sstephen
    Nov 20, 2017
    1
    Washed out graphics, condensed crowded maps, limited maps, corny story line. Very first COD was, is, a better game. Save your coin and look elsewhere.
  47. ResQ2
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Played the single player campaign. Absolutely pointless quick time events and the most bland missions i've never seen. absolutely standard cod, nothing special. The graphics could easily be from 2010 too. Definitely worse campaign than the "future settings" ones - and those were already pretty bad.
  48. RomanG700
    Nov 15, 2017
    3
    A game with pretty decent visuals and sound. And that's all the pro's we got for 60$. Gameplay haven't changed for the past 10 years at all. It still welcomes us with 5x5 meter maps and 12 players at once. Wooden physics, crappy animation, tons of kids with cheats, lots of microtransactions - here is what you'll get, when you buy this. As for single-player - it still sucks. Dumb plot,A game with pretty decent visuals and sound. And that's all the pro's we got for 60$. Gameplay haven't changed for the past 10 years at all. It still welcomes us with 5x5 meter maps and 12 players at once. Wooden physics, crappy animation, tons of kids with cheats, lots of microtransactions - here is what you'll get, when you buy this. As for single-player - it still sucks. Dumb plot, boring characters, faceless locations - it's the top of the iceberg. Don't waste your dollars and nerves.… Expand
  49. DeadlyCheese
    Nov 12, 2017
    0
    As someone who is a fan of the cod campaigns, it pains me to say that this game is the worst campaign in the series. Whoever thought it was a good idea to remove regen health needs to be fired. That works in games like Wolfenstein which does that well. I am not against health packs, but in cod, it just does not work at all.

    The multiplayer is the same as the past few years. Not much has    As someone who is a fan of the cod campaigns, it pains me to say that this game is the worst campaign in the series. Whoever thought it was a good idea to remove regen health needs to be fired. That works in games like Wolfenstein which does that well. I am not against health packs, but in cod, it just does not work at all.

    The multiplayer is the same as the past few years. Not much has changed.    … Expand
  50. nachtgold
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    It is nearly impossible to play multiplayer because your are lost in the console menu. It lasts hours before you find out where and how you can open a game or join with a friend.

    The single player campaign is ok, but sometimes frustrating.
  51. Todish
    Dec 2, 2017
    1
    i gave it 1 because i like the graphics...nothing else. Shooting is slow and feels heavy...very bad for a shooter. It's not like the other COD's. Story sucks HARD. Lacks immersion...short and boring. Not an AAA game. It's not worth the money.
  52. voodoo_911
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    این بازی کاملا از روی بتلفیلد کپی برداشته شده بود و متاسفانه به قدری خسته کننده و ضعیف بود که فقط دوست داشتم این بازی هرچه سریعتر تموم بشه.
    It was very weak and tedious and was completely copied from battlefield
    I was really sorry about this game
  53. Tenacidad963
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Este Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero seEste Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero se pierde el aspecto de inmersión. A pesar de tener gráficos actuales se ve como si fuera para niños. Entonces te das cuenta de que te subestiman como jugador, independientemente de que si ya has jugado a otros Call Of Duty´s. La campaña dura poco de entre 5 o 6 horas, el multijugador parece que le han puesto mucho entusiasmo parece que creen que el jugador es conformista y fácil de manejar.

    In English
    This Call Of Duty is a mockery to the intelligence, it can have in some parts good graphics and few good moments that please those who do not ask much for a game. However, they spoil a very important historical fact by putting boxes of micropayments. Eliminate a moment that should be epic for putting in the face of the player his bad practice of selling items that help you, but you lose the immersive aspect. Despite having current graphics it looks as if it were for children. Then you realize that they underestimate you as a player, regardless of whether you have already played other Call Of Duty's. The campaign lasts little between 5 or 6 hours, the multiplayer seems to have put a lot of enthusiasm seems to believe that the player is conformist and easy to handle.    … Expand
  54. vora_bat
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    This game is so bad, I had to write a review here, to express how much bad it is. it doesn't even deserve to be rated with 1. No no no, Zero is what this piece of incredible dullness deserves. For 60$ you get a retextured typical COD gameplay, with empty characters and empty story. A conveyer at its finest. Zero new mechanincs, zero inventions, zero creativity. Zero joy is what you get,This game is so bad, I had to write a review here, to express how much bad it is. it doesn't even deserve to be rated with 1. No no no, Zero is what this piece of incredible dullness deserves. For 60$ you get a retextured typical COD gameplay, with empty characters and empty story. A conveyer at its finest. Zero new mechanincs, zero inventions, zero creativity. Zero joy is what you get, with buying this game. It tries to be Battlefield, but behind nice screenshots is a plastic world, with tight corridor like levels, and empty background.… Expand
  55. Figaro79
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Нет возможности выбрать регион и сервер для сетевой игры. В итоге пинг высоченный и играть в мультиплеер невозможно.
  56. Snail
    Nov 16, 2017
    0
    I have no words to describe it... I Think most are buying this game for multiplayer, because limited to a few words about the campaign. You can only say that the campaign is, it is in Polish shooters on the quality of the storytelling, no hint of the reality of the dialogues and behavior of the soldiers in the most terrible war, continuous clowning, and templates. Now about the main thingI have no words to describe it... I Think most are buying this game for multiplayer, because limited to a few words about the campaign. You can only say that the campaign is, it is in Polish shooters on the quality of the storytelling, no hint of the reality of the dialogues and behavior of the soldiers in the most terrible war, continuous clowning, and templates. Now about the main thing - the multiplayer. Is going on here is the real obscenity, and I can't even name a single positive thing is awful, from the graphics, with that puke - brown colors, smeared textures, matchmaking does not maintain any criticism - to enter the game, wait for 10 minutes and then you'll have to wait till you see the weapon and other textures, and this in 2017!!! Ping jumps up to the ceiling, the system hits unintelligible to horror, and a very embarrassing moment - it is impossible to understand where the enemy is, and where the ally until you see the color of the lettering over the player nickname!!! All have the same form, at all! In hard modes, the constant murder of their players. About the dominance of cheaters of all stripes don't even want to say this is becoming the norm in this series. The gun sounds like a broken tape, in hard mode only 4 different types of games. The enemy appears literally in front of the nose out of nowhere, a system of movements worse than it was in the old games . After several days of agony in this "masterpiece", I ran Call of duty modern warfare 2, and I was generally sad and lonely. Why are you so **** up all that was already done 10 years ago??? How all this could be done, eh? these games just can't even try to compare, and it's been 8 years that you ate there, you freaks? Yes, any shooter 5 or 10 years ago is head and shoulders above the crap that you did in 2017. People who don't want to have regrets about wasted time and money and just save your nerves, don't buy this piece of **** even at the 90% discount. I'm a longtime fan of this series, but even my patience is over. Enough. The last decent game in Surry is CoD AW.… Expand
  57. SKELETOR420
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    I know many don't care for the single player but I'll always play it first. Campaign on PC (with gamepad) was an utter joke. Hit detection issues at least 1/3rd of the time. The levels are literally just corridors. The story is largely by the numbers and uninspired. A massively wasted opportunity. Compared to what IW and Treyarch have been putting out: Sledgehammer need to be taken offI know many don't care for the single player but I'll always play it first. Campaign on PC (with gamepad) was an utter joke. Hit detection issues at least 1/3rd of the time. The levels are literally just corridors. The story is largely by the numbers and uninspired. A massively wasted opportunity. Compared to what IW and Treyarch have been putting out: Sledgehammer need to be taken off CoD; their entries have always felt like a step backwards. It'll take a killer game to get me back into this series now.… Expand
  58. suadgromiljak
    Nov 17, 2017
    0
    Terrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Terrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!… Expand
  59. LifeHistory
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    What a bad way to throw heck of a comeback...I always dreamed of playing WW2 in such graphics and been waiting for Activiton to go back to the old classics but they failed badly. I never play and care about multiplayer. I mostly play COD games for the SP.

    I am going to make this as short as the game itself! PROS. -Great graphics. -Fantastic atmosphere it like being in the    What a bad way to throw heck of a comeback...I always dreamed of playing WW2 in such graphics and been waiting for Activiton to go back to the old classics but they failed badly. I never play and care about multiplayer. I mostly play COD games for the SP.

    I am going to make this as short as the game itself!
    PROS.
    -Great graphics.
    -Fantastic atmosphere it like being in the battlefield it's alive.
    -Medical kits.
    -Voice acting.
    -PC Optimized.
    CONS.
    -The Singelplayer is like 4h max.
    -It mostly car chase and holding possession and shooting. (Like a mobile game)
    -Too much of a cinematic play.
    -Only 6 chapters that feels rushed and very short.
    -Nothing special about the story.

    I still think infinite Warfare the worst COD still and this takes the second place. If only it was longer and had gameplay like the old ones this would been amazing. Activiton should find itself another series or just quit gaming! Its embarrassing really.    … Expand
  60. Abel199
    Nov 15, 2017
    0
    Nosotros los verdaderos gamers no queremos los micropagos basta de esa estafa ya, entonces que el juego lo podamos descargar gratis en la fecha de salida, ya basta del consumismo piensen en el usuario ..esto es un verdadero abuso no me lo compro.
  61. DioXGaming
    Nov 19, 2017
    2
    Not based on WWII but just another franchise on call of duty. Why won't this die already? Like there are different types of call of duty summary stories out there and they can't just let this die and start a new original game but no they have to create from scratch not based on story line. Only the fans rate this 10 because they're call of duty fans and that's their childhood.
  62. downliner
    Nov 7, 2017
    4
    If you are hoping to learn some history from this game then the only thing you will learn is America saves the day which as we all know is not how it happened.

    Come on people the War didn't start on D-Day :P And if a publisher says "factually and historically accurate" then comes out with a low budget Hollywood flick it doesn't really matter. You'll still buy it :P You know i've    If you are hoping to learn some history from this game then the only thing you will learn is America saves the day which as we all know is not how it happened.

    Come on people the War didn't start on D-Day :P

    And if a publisher says "factually and historically accurate" then comes out with a low budget Hollywood flick it doesn't really matter. You'll still buy it :P

    You know i've been in the Marketing industry for over 16 years and it still rings true to this day that Gamers are the easiest to influence into buying crap and the Publishers know this only too well.

    They used a tragic event to sell a game and most millenials cannot even tell the difference between an Iron Cross and a Swastika let alone the history behind either one so what does it mattter?

    The fact you even bought into this pile of trash in the first place blows the "Fool me once" line out of the water because with gamers were are onto "Fool me 17 times..." and still have no end in sight.    … Expand
  63. randomiam
    Dec 3, 2017
    0
    game is way to expensive. campaign lookds and sounds great but is short and not worth it. multiplayer is the same as usual, if youve played mw2 youve played ww2.

    zombies mode is the main reason i bought it. none of my friends had the money to spare for just that game mode.

    **** micro transactions
  64. xoma262
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    I hope developers would suffer for the rest of their live! I cannot understand how they released this piece of garbage. JUST LET THE SERIES DIE. Stop doing that ****
  65. JustMK
    Dec 30, 2017
    1
    Boringest Call of Duty that put me into sleep with first minutes of gameplay. I really liked Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare for their awesome futuristing setting, and I completely bored, annoyed of WWII theme in 2000's.
    I want back AW/IW-like CoD games. That was awesome
  66. karelpica99
    Dec 20, 2017
    0
    CoD is the primal representation of everything wrong with the game industry. Multiplayer focused, loot boxes, micro-transactions, season pass, dlcs, **** Activision, Destiny 2 is already the best selling game of 2017 and it came out in September, great first-party exclusives like Breath of the Wild and Horizon Zero Dawn celebrate 4 or 5 million copies sold, CoD sells 20 mil in a bad year,
  67. kusogame
    Feb 3, 2018
    0
    Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history. Worst campaign ever in COD history.
  68. RustyCoin
    Apr 25, 2018
    3
    I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay,I am not judging this game only because it has COD brand on it, by any means no. This game is one of the worst PC games in 2017 because it's not a game-only anymore. It's half a movie right now. And this have been happening since Black Ops 1. It was not so terribly cutscenes-based "game" as it is now, but it started at that point. And what we have now? We have - 5-10 minutes of gameplay, 15-20 minutes cutscenes and the circle goes on. So you get the objective, you go, do some shooting, throw grenades, boom - movie (infinte amount of cutscenes).

    And the quotes in those cutscenes...my god...they are terrible. Seriously, cutscenes like those exist only in bad war movies - "you're long way from texas boy".....

    Multiplayer is also nothing new - boring, monotonous, repetitive stuff, as every year.

    Reason why I'm giving this game 3 out of 10 is because graphics are kinda good actually (although I believe BF 1 still looks better), and visual effects. On big screen or TV effects looks really well. Other than that COD WW2 is a terrible product with boring story, stupid AI, uninteresting characters, lack of variety...the list could go on and on.    … Expand
  69. Dimulio
    Jul 5, 2021
    0
    Редкостное гуано. Любимый сеттинг умудрились так изговнять, что игра превращается в невыносимую пытку. Надеюсь, в аду найдется особое место для рукожопых и бездарных разработчиков, ответственных за этот высер. Стыд и позор!Редкостное гуано. Любимый сеттинг умудрились так изговнять, что игра превращается в невыносимую пытку. Надеюсь, в аду найдется особое место для рукожопых и бездарных разработчиков, ответственных за этот высер. Стыд и позор!
  70. X_Kill
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    I wrote a positive review of the single player experiance but had to take it down.. Since it cannot make up for the fact that I cannot connect to the multiplayer at all.. a lot of players are getting burned by this error 102526 and several forum posts have been made on the topic. I even waited for a patch to fix this issue but after waiting a long time for answers none has been given byI wrote a positive review of the single player experiance but had to take it down.. Since it cannot make up for the fact that I cannot connect to the multiplayer at all.. a lot of players are getting burned by this error 102526 and several forum posts have been made on the topic. I even waited for a patch to fix this issue but after waiting a long time for answers none has been given by the game developer and nothing came of the first patch to the game. Since I can't play half of my 60 dollar experience.. I am forced to say: Do not buy this game since you risk experiencing the same issues as I have.… Expand
  71. secretsw
    Jan 8, 2018
    1
    - Zero variability
    + You can minimize the game and watch memes during cutscenes.
  72. matt0909
    Jan 6, 2018
    1
    Stupid, boring, waster of money and time. Possibly the worst COD so far. Controls and game play are both horrifically bad. Do not get this game.

    Score 1/10
    Horrendous
  73. primalsmash
    Jan 12, 2018
    0
    To much input lag, quited game after i reached that aa gun and started call of duty 2.
    If you didn't play cod 2, i recommend you rather buy it, than this ****
  74. Ramiro1992
    Jul 1, 2020
    2
    Crap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots ofCrap game overall, awful controls, pathetic AI (partner AI is among the worst I have seen so far, partners won't shoot enemies even while standing just next to them). Add that a shameful and horrible voice acting, and you have a combo for disaster. I started liking this game until I saw the atrocious AI and the artificially cheap difficulty. They managed to ruin a game that had lots of potential, the characters are boring and uninteresting, and honestly, I don't care about their personalities, they act so cliche it reminds me to the awful cinematics of BF 1, a bunch of retards doing the voice acting, I WANT TO PLAY A **** GAME NOT WATCH A ****G MOVIE!
    Expect hours and hours of boring and annoying cinematics. Damn, I miss the old days with simple characters, not these stupid npcs that have the ego so high, same crap with BF 1, I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT THE PERSONALITIES OF THE CHARACTERS!
    Overall, one of the worst COD games to date, a spit in the face for fans that loved the classic
    Soo **** boring, that level where you gotta be that retarded woman and show documents to answer stupid questions, is so damn boring it almost put me to sleep. Looks like a blatant and cheap copy of Medal of Honor, that stupid **** and the documents level are almost the same as the medal of honor games for the original Playstation. I hope they added the women to copy MOH and not a blatant and embarrasing attempt to promote feminsim via this piece of **** game. I am sad man cause this game had lots of potential but they ruined everything with bullet sponges enemies and atrocious gameplay plus stupid AI, even for free this game is a **** scam    … Expand
  75. Psy_pmP
    Sep 4, 2018
    1
    I do not know how about the whole game, but in the single player everything becomes clear from the very beginning. In the first level, you are shown how the developers **** on the players. Run from the fence to the fence, die Hundred times and it's unclear what to do. At this point, I deleted the game. The good did not buy this ****
  76. rfz88
    Nov 18, 2018
    0
    Calling this a subpar experience is an understatement. This title does not deliver on any fronts (pun intended):

    SP: 0/10 (as expected with all CODs) MP: 1/10 (worse than the usual 4-5/10 in the past) This does not offer anything remotely enjoying in terms of GP, immersion or realism. This is a blatant racist game and an insult to all the nations who were involved in ww2. Avoid    Calling this a subpar experience is an understatement. This title does not deliver on any fronts (pun intended):

    SP: 0/10 (as expected with all CODs)
    MP: 1/10 (worse than the usual 4-5/10 in the past)

    This does not offer anything remotely enjoying in terms of GP, immersion or realism. This is a blatant racist game and an insult to all the nations who were involved in ww2.

    Avoid this like the cancer it is.    … Expand
  77. Warmuro
    Apr 29, 2018
    2
    They tried to keep up with Battlefield 1, they failed miserably. We don't need another CoD for the next 20 years, i'm sure of that.
  78. Dokdo
    Dec 25, 2017
    0
    Awfully broken game. Don't trust the critics. Game critics obviously have a sponsorship with them. They are too scared to say anything real. Don't buy this piece of **** game.
  79. Jargentium15
    Jun 2, 2018
    4
    is a game with a terrible downgrade, the same gameplay and the story mode is bland , I thought that this COD was going to be better game for its setting in World War II, but in the end this COD is a disappointment
  80. Xeculiar
    Mar 28, 2022
    0
    how do people find this trash game good. sh*t campaign with boring characters bad multiplayer with pay 2 win weapon variants and a god awful zombies what's the point of playing this game when I could literally play ghosts and have a funner experience. the game is so bad it gave me aids
  81. StarkAgentos
    Mar 28, 2022
    3
    Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.Поиграл 1 час. Игра постоянно лагает на мощном ПК при хреновой графике. Сложность огромная при тупом ИИ. Геймплей - обычный тир, а сюжета здесь вообще как такового нет. Как герои тут показаны омериканцы, а не русские. Что за русофобия. Локации коридорные. Полное говно.
  82. SRKNZ
    Mar 19, 2019
    2
    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game    If the last two to three years can be remembered for anything its "unmemorable" games. The baton in the race to the bottom has been picked up by COD WWII.

    This is really a banal remix of any combination of previous WWII games you care to mention with big budget cinematic's and prettier graphics. Like so many other titles I rather get the feeling this in itself is enough to make a game sell. Maybe, maybe not.

    What does help is creative varied game play and an acknowledgement that the USA was not the only country to fight the Axis. This gets a quick mention at the start in truth but then its USA all the way. No option whatsoever to play another allied or axis nation which would have made the game a lot more diverse and interesting.

    Whats also flawed in this game is like so many others its reliance on "push button" cut scenes where you try to destroy your keyboard attempting to do something pointless like a early on and quite frankly God awful tussle with a German soldier armed with a bayonet. This could and in my opinion should have been left out. It added nothing and the clumsy approach taken to key/mouse combinations was a usability nightmare.

    In short, in my opinion, this is mediocre fare that's repetitive and feels awkward due to the weird mouse key combo's used in the annoying, on best left in the recycle bin ", interactive" cut scenes. 2/10 from me.    … Expand
  83. leMMingSlayeR
    Feb 23, 2018
    3
    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130.    I'm going to focus on the multiplayer part of this game, and I can sum it up in two words. Just awful.

    From a technical standpoint this game is very poorly made. Not only are the player hitboxes worse in this game than any previous CoD I've played (just about all of them since MW), but the game itself is so buggy and hitchy my FPS go from 130 down to 40 and shoot right back up to 130. I have also experienced shadow and texture pop-in, and more than one hard freeze.

    Add to this the fact that it took 3 system reboots and finally a launch in safe mode just to get the game to launch to the main menu.

    I am seriously disappointed with this game, seems like Activision doesn't really care about quality anymore so long as they can get a studio to crank out another installment every single year.

    Sledgehammer games did an amazing job on MW3, it is to this day one of my favorite in the franchise (MW2 takes the top spot) but this installment just doesn't seem to live up to the quality I hav experienced in other Sledgehammer games.

    I will say that the campaign was very good, and had what I thought was the best narrative of any CoD game in the last decade. I did play the campaign on the PS4 version however, as even with the lower fidelity and 30FPS, I had a noticeably more stable experience.

    In the end it is the technical difficulties that ruined the experience for me.

    System Specs:

    Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
    16GB DDR4 3200
    EVGA GTX 1070 SC
    850EVO SSD
    Asus ROG Strix 144hz 1080p monitor    … Expand
  84. koolaidman486
    Mar 14, 2018
    1
    Primarily multiplayer:
    this is better than console, I'll give it that but there are several problems:
    -The hit detection is deplorable -Weapon balance is a joke -Miss quickscoping? Sad to say, its back and more OP than ever -Bad anti-cheat -Looks worse than World at War -Poorly optimized, I drop frames on worse than recommended settings with much of any weather in there -You will    Primarily multiplayer:
    this is better than console, I'll give it that but there are several problems:
    -The hit detection is deplorable
    -Weapon balance is a joke
    -Miss quickscoping? Sad to say, its back and more OP than ever
    -Bad anti-cheat
    -Looks worse than World at War
    -Poorly optimized, I drop frames on worse than recommended settings with much of any weather in there
    -You will unload magazines into people only to not kill them, let alone a hit even registering

    I will never recommend this game, not even to my worst enemy.    … Expand
  85. Kikratos
    Jan 25, 2018
    3
    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2. 50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the    Overall, I do not recommend this game. Especially if you're looking for something similar to the previous series titles in World War II.

    The campaign mode disappointed me, it has a very boring and extremely short story, very different from what I played in the past in titles for Playstation 2.

    50% of the phrases spoken by the characters contain "Zussman" (name of one of the characters), this really annoyed!! The whole story of the game is about this guy.

    I noticed that the developers wanted to prioritize the multiplayer mode, which, in my opinion, should not even exist. And "Zombie Mode" is very rough.

    The graphics are great. Gameplay without any innovation, is the same as the other modern CoD.

    Anyway, I played because I'm a fan of the series, but no chance to play it again. I do not recommend it!    … Expand
  86. VETRA
    Jun 17, 2018
    1
    Sin gracia, soso, desfasado de salida en cuanto a graficos, la misma jugabilidad de siempre.
  87. Spudz
    Dec 26, 2017
    1
    Campaign is very short, small maps and story is not that engaging. Multiplayer is a complete disappointment. 6 on 6 with small maps is boring and repetitive. Lost interest quickly. Save your money. I was really hopeful. I’m done with this franchise.
  88. 5thy
    Mar 20, 2018
    2
    This is the only COD game that I didn't replay (except for Infinite Warfare and Black ops 3 which I refused to play). The reason was that the game was absolutely boring. I haven't tried the multiplayer yet, but the SP was awful. I felt like I was watching a mediocre military film about WW2, based on true events.
    Aiming through a scope was a real pain in the ass. Also experiences a number    This is the only COD game that I didn't replay (except for Infinite Warfare and Black ops 3 which I refused to play). The reason was that the game was absolutely boring. I haven't tried the multiplayer yet, but the SP was awful. I felt like I was watching a mediocre military film about WW2, based on true events.
    Aiming through a scope was a real pain in the ass. Also experiences a number of glitches and fps drop.
    Also what on earth were russian PPSH machine guns doing on Omaha???
    I really hope if there' s another COD about WWII, it'll look more like World at war.    … Expand
  89. LillDeeDee
    Apr 27, 2018
    4
    This is probably the best example of how hype destroys games...

    COD WW2, for me a title that made me hope for a new era of cod - well no, you dun **** it up! Before I get to the annoying stuff, lemme talk what this game does good/new in comparison to older cod shooters... (I played waw, bo2 and bo3 before) Headquarters: Yes, this may not be the newest thing in gaming history, a    This is probably the best example of how hype destroys games...

    COD WW2, for me a title that made me hope for a new era of cod - well no, you dun **** it up!

    Before I get to the annoying stuff, lemme talk what this game does good/new in comparison to older cod shooters... (I played waw, bo2 and bo3 before)

    Headquarters: Yes, this may not be the newest thing in gaming history, a lot of other games like destiny had that before ... but to cod this was an actual refreshing idea... Shooting range, a place where you can try out several score streaks, a 1 v 1 place... This is stuff I really liked to see!

    Zombies: Yes, people may b like - the **** you talking about! This is not the zombies we wanted but tbh I really loved the idea of having sum sort of little side campaign as zombie mode. This was sth a little bit new and more casual easter egg hunting made the mode a better option for a bigger amount of people. Of course, in order to achieve the best possible ending, you had to find hidden stuff and that's were zombies goes back to the og ee hunting. The only thing that was quite cheap were the ground spawns... especially those overused jumpscares spawns... those were good for the first time playign the zombies mode, but that's actually it... The boss fight was quite interesting even tho it felt a little bit too easy.

    The only good mission in the campaing - the pilot mission: Taking over some mechanics from older plane fight simulators, this was a quite refreshing mission. The controls sometimes felt clunky but in overall I had more fun than the rest of the campaign.

    Now lets go to the bad stuff!

    Repetitive COD gene: This game is, as from the community expected nothing special... it was overhyped and nothing new.

    Campaign: I like the sort of Brotherhood part in the campaign but the rest of it is quite BORING. It's short, it's repetitive AND the ending was the most anticlimatic bs ever... Especially the stealth missions were horrible... Over the top cutscenes and there were no really interesting characters in there.

    The tank mission: Holy crap, this one was hella annoying to play through... The controls felt clunky and it also felt like this tank wasn't rly responding to my pissed of button smashing... I wish there was on option to get out of the tank and destroy the enemy tank with explosives or stuff... In end this mission was hella anticlimatic and painful...

    Multiplayer... The core of every cod: Welp - the new stuff is no fun (war mode, it's literally the worst mode ingame). Like every other cod you get to the point where you just have no fun BUT in this game - it only took me 10 hours to say - NOPE, not gonna do that! We have the classic modes like tdm, dom and snd, every map has nearly the same layout... The loadout system, now changed into divisions, gives you NO freedom of creating fun classes... it's like this game tried to be less casual and more competitive... There are also just 3 weapons that you wanna use in the future: Bar, PPsh and the kar... the lmgs are again not worth the time, the shotguns are hella annoying but also useless... The thing that made bo3 good, was that every gun was hella interesting to use and to play with - you had soo much freedom in creating custom classes ... where is that? That was literally the only thing that made cod's multiplayer have such a high replay value... For me this game gets a 4/10... I would've love to give it less than 4, thats how pissed I was for spending 60 euro on that game - but i just can't ignore how fun it sometimes was and how they at least tried to do sth. new...

    After a total amount of 50 hours, I stopped playing that game.    … Expand
  90. Fl0wAnima
    Jul 20, 2018
    2
    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014 Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal .... The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing. Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did    For 1.2 hours, I already say that this: FULL HUGE
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare: It was also done by Sledgehammer Games like WW2
    But some dick game is optically worse than the game of 2014
    Multiplayer is more or less normal, but if optimization was normal ....
    The mechanics of shooting are not bad, the sounds are about nothing.
    Separately, about the game menu, the cartoon: Who did this menu, I do not need your help, I can do it myself, I'm so confused that I do not understand where the game starts to look, I waited 20 minutes for the game to connect to the game ...
    This is some kind of not respect for the players from the Sledgehammer games
    Sorry for my bad Eng language , i'm 14 years old Russian kid.    … Expand
  91. zNeverSleeping
    Jul 21, 2019
    3
    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa    Bem desapontado com alguns aspectos.

    A campanha me pareceu bem artificial, só me chamou atenção nos primeiros 15 minutos, depois é mais do mesmo; os graficos são pobres. Não há camadas e detalhes que realmente fazem a diferença na atimosfera, e sim texturas bem detalhadas por conta da tendencia ao 4k. Fora que é mal otimizado, puxando 50% da minha 2060 em diversos momentos; outra coisa que me incomoda são as animações, que mais parecem de um jogo de PS2, estragando todo realismo que a engine poderia trazer - e não tras, de qualquer forma.    … Expand
  92. BadgerBait
    Apr 22, 2019
    0
    Is there even a single player game or is it just one continuous cinematic? 5 minutes in and they are still trying to make me care about NPCs. If I wanted to watch a show about WWII I would have put on Band of Brothers.

    You get a 0 because if I don't get any game play in 5 minutes I have to assume there is no game to actually play.
  93. Duckers_McQuack
    Oct 31, 2019
    1
    As usual cod games doesn't run properly at all or just crashes. This one a damn lot. Crashes 90% of the time.
  94. GGgame
    Jun 30, 2019
    0
    When ı started the game, at first level (D-DAY) ı said this will be good but in end ı said this is the worst call of duty ever. THANK YOU SO MUCH ACTİVİSİON, THİS GAME İS SUCKS. I WANT A KİLL DANIEL
  95. Denis94
    Jun 22, 2021
    4
    Activision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una granActivision intentó revivir los buenos tiempos de los juegos de la segunda guerra mundial con este título pero sin éxito alguno, la ambientación no es muy buena y el modo historia es un copia y pega de cosas que ya vimos una y otra vez, parece que estos Americanos no saben hacer otra cosa con todas las historias que tiene el conflicto bélico, el multijugador se siente soso y sin una gran ambición, se salvan los gráficos y el modo zombis que es bastante interesante.… Expand
  96. teamfranken91
    Dec 20, 2019
    2
    I created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'llI created an account to review this game. It's fine (by which I mean bland and uninspired, but I mean it's a CoD SP campaign, so you know), but about two hours in I hit a tank level. The controls were *awful.* You can't really move the turret, except very slowly, and if you recenter your mouse, it stops swinging. You also can't really tell which direction your tank is facing, so you'll press W to advance and go sailing off to the right.

    This is aggravated by the fact that you're in a compact, urban setting, so you can expect to spend a lot of time getting stuck in corners and ramming into walls. Unfortunately, the point of the tank level is to destroy enemy tanks, which you can *only* do by flanking them, so in the unlikely event that you actually stumble upon an enemy tank's flank, good luck moving your turret into position before the tank turns to face you.

    I'm astounded that it got released in this state. Fortunately it only took me 2.5 hours to get there, so I was able to refund it.    … Expand
  97. r03vg
    Apr 15, 2020
    4
    Тир на рельсах с американской пропагандой. Карикатурно, шаблонно, бессмысленно.
  98. Morphine_Child
    Feb 1, 2020
    3
    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's    I bought this game after I got the desire to play some WWII shooter, and oh boy do I regret it. Yes, I knew reviews are not that bright but I still thought game will be fun. And that was my biggest mistake - this game is anything but fun.

    Whole campaign is one over the top action scene after another. There is absolutely nothing original about it, zero freedom of movement. For heaven's sake you can't even open the doors until your stupid AI scripted friends do it for you. Apparently you are too stupid to do it.

    AI is dumb and completely scripted like everything else. Sometimes they ignore you from 2m, sometimes they have laser accuracy, effectively killing all the fun of gunplay. Shame really.

    Visually the game is ok, on par with 2017 games, but then again, there are better looking games as well. Characters look good, but they are some of the most annoying characters ever in a WWII shooter. They are just painfully stereotypical...

    At the end... I haven't finished this game and I never will. And just to show why exactly everything in this game is devoid of any shape of inspiration and originality, play the tank mission. Here it's obvious that even people that made it never even played it. If you want to finish it, you have set your controls to maximum sensitivity or else you cannot even turn your turret fast enough to aim. Completely and utterly broken mission.

    Anyway, enough about it. Save your money and buy some old WWII classics.    … Expand
  99. Muismi
    Apr 28, 2020
    1
    Call of Duty: WWII es el supuesto regreso a los origenes de la saga, pero tras haber jugado a todos los COD hasta Black Ops 2 puedo decir que de vuelta a los origenes tiene más bien poco. Es un intento fallido de dar frescura a una saga que está más que aborrecida por el público. Tiene bugs, incoherencia en la trama, fallos históricos y simplemente es lo mismo una y otra vez con call ofCall of Duty: WWII es el supuesto regreso a los origenes de la saga, pero tras haber jugado a todos los COD hasta Black Ops 2 puedo decir que de vuelta a los origenes tiene más bien poco. Es un intento fallido de dar frescura a una saga que está más que aborrecida por el público. Tiene bugs, incoherencia en la trama, fallos históricos y simplemente es lo mismo una y otra vez con call of duty. Toda esta situación está agravada por el hecho de las cajas Loot del juego, que directamente incitan al juego, a la adicción a las cajas y al juego de azar. Por no decir que Battlefield 1, el principal competidor con este juego, es mejor en absolutamente todos los aspectos, gráficos, sonido, apartado online, optimización, campaña, y los demás apartados. Una pena que no sea una vuelta a los origenes de verdad, Call of Duty 2 por ejemplo hubiera sido un buen punto de referencia para desarrollar este juego. No recomiendo a la gente malgastar su dinero en este juego, hay un mercado lleno de juegos mejores que este.… Expand
  100. Milansan777
    Mar 29, 2021
    1
    The graphics is the only thing this game has going for it. Was hoping for a trip back to "World at War", such a classic...but sadly not the case...not by a long shot!
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

21
#21 Most Discussed PC Game of 2017
21
#21 Most Shared PC Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 21
  3. Negative: 1 out of 21
  1. PC PowerPlay
    Jan 6, 2018
    50
    Familiarity breeds contempt. [Issue#269, p.49]
  2. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 2, 2018
    80
    The new Call of Duty is like a shopping list, in which the devs list one second-rate cliché after another. It's not always for the sake of it, but it's already making the WWII unique that everybody should play. [Issue#280]
  3. Games.cz
    Jan 2, 2018
    70
    A magnificent, but also a sympathetic, unpretentious return to the roots of the series. Yet the campaign is short-lived, and your next experience depends on how much you enjoy the multiplayer and/or shooting Nazi zombies.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »