Call of Duty: WWII

1. PAYAMFURY

   Nov 3, 2017

   10

   بازی شاهکاریه هم از نظر گرافیک و هم از نظر داستان . بخش زامبی هم خیلی ترسناک و پیشرفت کرده چون اسلج همر توی بازی های deadspace همکاری داشتهویکبازی شاهکاریه هم از نظر گرافیک و هم از نظر داستان . بخش زامبی هم خیلی ترسناک و پیشرفت کرده چون اسلج همر توی بازی های deadspace همکاری داشتهویک بخش زامبی عالی آورده.میریم سراغ بخش چندنفره که با داشتن چند حالت جدید پیشرفت زیادی داشته و به دوران اوج خود رسیده.… Expand

   • 50 of 194 users found this helpful
2. Devistator66

   Nov 3, 2017

   9

   Amazing Call of Duty experience and one you will definitely love. The game offers a fun campaign that doesn't last too long just like otherAmazing Call of Duty experience and one you will definitely love. The game offers a fun campaign that doesn't last too long just like other entries in the franchise. The multiplayer is very fun especially if you are playing with your friends. The Nazi Zombies mode definitely delivers on the scare factor and it's overall action gameplay is spectacular! Sledgehammer delivered on what they promised and gave us what we wanted. This game in my opinion deserves a solid 9/10 because there is always room for improvement but hopefully as the year goes on Sledgehammer will keep adding innovative content to this amazing game.… Expand

   • 5 of 18 users found this helpful
4. Empyrea

   Sep 19, 2021

   8

   I only played the campaign and I just can say that I liked it. Graphics are good and gameplay as well. Bad things would be that you have toI only played the campaign and I just can say that I liked it. Graphics are good and gameplay as well. Bad things would be that you have to download 35 GB if you want to play this game even if you are only going to play the campaign. It's the first time I see this. I normally play games english but because I would have to change the language of my ps4 I played directly in Spanish. Voices were ok but the recording of the voices was quite bad (sometimes loud, sometimes low). I didn't try the zombies because I'm not a fan of them. Good game.
   
   The campaign is 11 missions plus the epilog and each mission last about half an hour so it will take you about 6 hours.… Expand

   • 0 of 0 users found this helpful
5. Firewing2

   Nov 3, 2017

   5

   Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncatedHonestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.
   
   I'm a huge fan of the CoD series as a whole, and was very excited by the promise of a return to the WW2 roots, but this game is just disappointing.… Expand

   • 6 of 10 users found this helpful
6. BorderlineBunk

   Nov 7, 2017

   4

   I gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantlyI gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when games like BF1 are just burying them in quality. This isn't even a Battlefield fanboy over here. I've been with COD since COD 2, but its blatantly obvious that they don't care about making a fun UNIQUE experience anymore and its just about **** on this years version of another subpar game. God just give up COD this is the nail in the coffin of the series for me. So done with their ****… Expand

   • 1 of 2 users found this helpful
7. ManOfChap

   Nov 17, 2017

   2

   "BOOTS ON THE GROUND" what a load of nonsense. This is another copy and paste CoD game. Campaign is absolutely awful. Zombies is decent but 1"BOOTS ON THE GROUND" what a load of nonsense. This is another copy and paste CoD game. Campaign is absolutely awful. Zombies is decent but 1 map is not worth it. MP is lacking and the EXACT SAME for years now.… Expand

   • 1 of 2 users found this helpful
8. itsdanky

   May 23, 2018

   0

   DO NOT EXPECT YOUR ORIGINAL FONDNESS TO BE REKINDLED BY THIS MASQUERADE.
   This is not a WW2 game. As stated by many others, this is a justDO NOT EXPECT YOUR ORIGINAL FONDNESS TO BE REKINDLED BY THIS MASQUERADE.
   This is not a WW2 game. As stated by many others, this is a just modern warfare reskinned to look like WW2. I was very excited about this game, because I was an avid player of the original CODs in the WW2 era. I was hoping to get that experience with updated features. I am beyond disappointed. To help others avoid buying this game with false expectations, I will tell you what aspects ruined it for me.
   
   -BOLT ACTION IRON SIGHTS DESTROYED
   Firstly, the only weapon I used in COD1, UO, and COD2 was the bolt action rifle with iron sights. It took skill, and it fit my play style of not jumping around like an idiot with an SMG. Bolt action rifles (iron sights only) also happened to be the most common weapon in WW2 apart from American forces. What does COD WW2 give us? One bolt action rifle with iron sights that was put into the game as an afterthought and must be unlocked AND take up an attachment slot. Scopes are the default. In addition the iron sight bolt action rifle still handles like there is a scope on it. The animation and timing looks and feels like you are trying to look through the lens. This exclusion of the one of the most quintessential aspects of the WW2 genre is a slap in the face to all bolt action iron sight lovers.
   
   -This is still nothing more than a full auto/quick scoping nightmare.
   Full autos existed in the original CODs, but they were nowhere near the instakill 'who shoots first' death machines that comprise CODWW2. Yes, a good player could iron sight someone at long range with a carefully aimed headshot, but not at full auto. The original full auto weapons wouldn't melt down 4 players instantly halfway across the map. The recoil was far greater, and trigger control was necessary for accuracy even at close range.
   
   -Bullet piercing is outrageous.
   Bullets from even small caliber fire piercing thick metal surfaces is ludicrous. It's even worse on rinse and repeat maps with predictable hiding places. Just shoot through where you know someone will be. Yawn.
   
   -Tactical awareness of surroundings ruined.
   Then: Stealth determined by careful movement and selective fire. Enemy positions determined by careless movement and selective fire. You learned to locate the enemy by listening and instinct. The distinct sound of a Garand after it fired its last round giving you a brief window of opportunity. The difference between an enemy and ally based on the type of gun being fired. Does a German break cover to pursue the location of the person firing an STG44? Not likely. Weapons were restricted to the forces that used them. This seemingly unimportant aspect makes a world of difference in actual gameplay. You had only your senses to help you. Yes people still did the "run n' gun"/"spray n pray", but they were at a serious disadvantage to a calculated player.
   
   Now: Any gun, any player. Weapon distinctions rendered pointless. Recon scorestreak to show enemy positions. So much overpowering ambient noise and/or perks to make listening for the enemy no more than a crapshoot.
   
   -Screen shake over the top.
   My screen shakes constantly. Far away explosions make your screen shake violently. It's a stupidly poor attempt at immersion and gives me a headache.
   
   -Melee Showdowns
   Who didn't enjoy watching two bolt actions clashing at close range and having a melee duel? Dancing around trying to land a carefully aimed rifle butt to the face. It was almost a common understanding, an unspoken gentleman's agreement if you will, to duke it out. It was an endearing aspect of the originals. Well, that's not a thing anymore. The old mechanics made it viable. Now, well, the game design doesn't even allow for such a thing to happen.
   
   Bottom Line:
   I made the mistake of pre-ordering this game on PSN due to my excitement but couldn't get a refund after I played the Beta. I didn't download the actual game and play it for 6 months because the Beta disgusted me. They destroyed practically everything that made the original games great. Why do I have to play for hours to unlock the most common weapon type in WW2 (iron sighted bolt action)?
   ***Yes I am aware that the American standard issue was not a bolt action, but the British, German, Russian, Japanese, Italian, etc were all issued bolt action iron sighted weapons as the primary small arm***
   Why is the only ONE available designed like garbage?
   This game was marketed with lies that appealed to the emotional attachment players had to the originals and only delivered hot garbage. The game doesn't even feel like WW2.
   
   I don't care about the micro transactions. You don't have to buy crates to get loot and unlockables. You get plenty of crates from orders and contracts. If people want to waste money on overpriced crates, that's their prerogative.
   
   Buy the game used if you must. There is certainly no shortage of used copies.… Expand

   • 0 of 1 users found this helpful

See all 551 User Reviews