Space Station 76

Name: Space Station 76
Genre: Sci-Fi, Drama, Comedy
Released: September 19, 2014
Duration: 93 min
Rating: 49

2014

METASCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 10 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 21 Ratings

See All

5.5

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5.5	Your Score
5.5	User Score Mixed or average reviews based on 21 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

Space Station 76

Now Playing: Space Station 76

Movie Details & Credits

Sony Pictures | Release Date: September 19, 2014 | R

Summary: A character-driven, domestic dramedy, which takes place in a 1970's version of the future, where personalities and asteroids collide.

Director: Jack Plotnick

Genre(s): Sci-Fi, Drama, Comedy

Rating: R

Runtime: 93 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

RogerEbert.com Matt Zoller Seitz

Sep 19, 2014

Calling Space Station 76 a spoof of 1970s science fiction doesn't do the trick. It's quiet, slow movie that's often funny, sometimes sad, and occasionally uncomfortable. Read full review

Joe Leydon

Mar 18, 2014

Aiming more for bemused chuckles than for convulsive laughter, Plotnick and his actors deftly evoke a faux Me Decade ambiance throughout Space Station 76. Read full review

Keith Phipps

Sep 18, 2014

Plotnick’s mix of straight-faced absurdity and unexpected poignance doesn’t always gel, but it also makes the film more resonant than a straightforward spoof could ever be, and adds another layer to the film’s central joke: You can take to the stars, but the past will always travel with you. Read full review

James Rocchi

Sep 16, 2014

The film's look and feel are far more purposeful and propulsive than the story and script, but even so, Space Station 76 has more than a few laughs inside its brazen bizarreness. Read full review

Nicolas Rapold

Sep 18, 2014

Not that Dr. Bot and the oblivious self-righteousness won’t delight certain fans, but this remains a protracted, scattershot comedy sketch that never quite nails its tone. Read full review

Alan Scherstuhl

Sep 16, 2014

Sympathetic audiences may be diverted by Space Station 76's period design and skilled performances, and by the mystery of what exactly the filmmakers are going for. (The less sympathetic may just ask what the point is.) Read full review

Clayton Dillard

Sep 14, 2014

As a space-opera lampoon, it's incoherent primarily because it's never clear what the filmmakers are attempting to spoof. Read full review

SEE ALL 10 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

MelancholicAlc

Feb 5, 2015

The subtext title for this film is of course: a space station as imagined from 1976. Setting the movie in the 70s is both a clever cost saving device, because it's a lot cheaper to simply use decors, furniture, props from the 70s) and a hommage to the only golden era Hollywood has everThe subtext title for this film is of course: a space station as imagined from 1976. Setting the movie in the 70s is both a clever cost saving device, because it's a lot cheaper to simply use decors, furniture, props from the 70s) and a hommage to the only golden era Hollywood has ever known, the seventies. It was the one time Hollywood prefered to make meaningful quality films, (Parallax, Lolly Madonna, They shoot horses, Sergio Leone) over the bombastic superficial crap that came before and the meaningless crap that came after.
Of course many people will mistake this for a sci-fi movie. It is not. It's a straight drama, despite the occassional absurd moment, like with Dr. Bot. I do have a preference for less plot driven films because plots are like straight jackets: The struggle HAS TO be resolved, the boy NEEDS to get the girl, the killer SHALL be caught, the world WILL be saved etc. Why, oh why should we give in to the infantile yearning for plots? It doesn't challenge us one bit. The characters are being made fun of, sure, but that's more to demonstraty the banality of life, or it's absurdity, than to make us laugh.
Special mention: Kylie Rogers, who is the 10 year old veteran with 20 credits, including a TV show with 9 episode.
Her acting is deceptively natural, and if she overcomes the obstacle of her rather run-of-the-mill Barbie looks, she might be a big one a la Knightly or Adams.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

mossfoot

Sep 20, 2014

Just saw Space Station 76. This review nails it. The best way to describe it is "entertainingly boring".

You know how those 1970s era Sci-Fi films tended to be kind of plodding? I don't just mean 2001, but something like Silent Running or Logan's Run or Space 1999 or anything else fromJust saw Space Station 76. This review nails it. The best way to describe it is "entertainingly boring".

You know how those 1970s era Sci-Fi films tended to be kind of plodding? I don't just mean 2001, but something like Silent Running or Logan's Run or Space 1999 or anything else from that time. There might be action, but there was also a lot of nothin going on as well for long stretches?

This movie makes me wonder: is it possible to make a parody of something that is too clever, too accurate, and played too straight? While there are some funny moments (even some laugh-out-loud), some ironic moments, some tongue in cheek moments, some cringing moments... much of the time it's played so straight you could actually imagine it being made in 1976 almost exactly as is.

It is however fascinating from a production viewpoint. Everything about it from the models, the lighting, the set design, the camera direction, the pacing, absolutely everything, rings true for the 70s. I can't say it's a great film, but I will say it's worth watching, especially for film buffs who will appreciate what's going on.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

reginaldwam3

Sep 19, 2014

I loved the retro futurist premise and all the performances, but it was a film that buried its dry, often very witty humor under such a deep layer of, myriad, human melancholia that it becomes a difficult viewing experience at times. There is a Mad Men-like view of attitudes and demeanorsI loved the retro futurist premise and all the performances, but it was a film that buried its dry, often very witty humor under such a deep layer of, myriad, human melancholia that it becomes a difficult viewing experience at times. There is a Mad Men-like view of attitudes and demeanors drawn from our recent past that are played more for laughs (possibly? it's not clear), but ultimately make for the most uncomfortable moments of the film. Maybe Patrick Wilson's workplace proclivity is informing his audience on how best to view the film: with mug full of brandy.

But there are great moments, especially as the 70s soundtrack was pumped in to this anachronistic paradox of a setting, and the cast was wonderful. I hope movies like this continue to be made. I didn't ultimately love the film, but it was the first time in years I was genuinely excited to sit down and watch a film, and that was a good feeling.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

tvnewsguido

Sep 19, 2014

See it but don't expect to have good time.

It's all one big visual joke. It's a funny joke but isn't strong enough to sustain the mundane domestic dramedy tacked on. It's clear this script was built by committee. The compromises in the overall vision of "what this is" are clear. ISee it but don't expect to have good time.

It's all one big visual joke. It's a funny joke but isn't strong enough to sustain the mundane domestic dramedy tacked on.

It's clear this script was built by committee. The compromises in the overall vision of "what this is" are clear.

I love the fact that this movie exists but I didn't enjoy watching it very much.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

Syrinx80

Nov 10, 2014

This movie is neither a comedy (not even a black comedy it's billed as) nor a sci-fi flick. The plot, whatever little of it exists, is essentially the same tired commentary on the existential angst in the American suburbs. The movie just crawls along, and one keeps watching hoping forThis movie is neither a comedy (not even a black comedy it's billed as) nor a sci-fi flick. The plot, whatever little of it exists, is essentially the same tired commentary on the existential angst in the American suburbs. The movie just crawls along, and one keeps watching hoping for something to happen, hoping for some payoff. It never comes. The ending is so unsatisfactory, you want to reach out and strangle the director for wasting an hour and a half of your life. The only reason I don't give it a 0 is because of the tremendous attention to detail that went into recreating the seventies. Other than the polished special effects, the movie looks and feels as if it came from that decade.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

Eddyjl86

Oct 3, 2014

I don't know what they were trying to achieve with this film... but the result is the worst... thing... ever. Not 0 out of 10 as I can see some effort went into... whatever it was they were trying to do with this. But whatever it was, it epically failed.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

Broyax

Aug 6, 2019

On se demande assez vite si c'est du lard ou du cochon... car en effet, quelque chose cloche : il manque les rires enregistrés ! qu'est-ce qu'il a branlé le stagiaire ? on voit bien que les décors font toc, on se croirait dans Star Trek... la série. Pire que ça en vérité : un croisementOn se demande assez vite si c'est du lard ou du cochon... car en effet, quelque chose cloche : il manque les rires enregistrés ! qu'est-ce qu'il a branlé le stagiaire ? on voit bien que les décors font toc, on se croirait dans Star Trek... la série. Pire que ça en vérité : un croisement entre Star trek et La Croisière s'amuse...

Ce tas d'inepties ne fait rire personne, y compris au quarantième degré. Et puis on voit bien que Liv Tyler est encore passée sur le billard : ça date de 2014 cette merde, on le voit bien ! elle a la peau tirée comme un tambour. Et elle rechigne toujours autant à nous montrer quoi que ce soit, meeeerde.... parce que comme "actrice" (?) elle ne s'est pas arrangée, elle est toujours aussi nulle à chier.

Au moins, elle se fond avec le décor de cette pseudo-comédie archi-nulle à chier, ce film de golio mongolo où on a oublié les rires enregistrés ; or sans les rires, ça gâche tout. Plus qu'à tirer la chasse !… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 9 REVIEWS