Warner Independent Pictures (WIP) | Release Date: March 4, 2005
8.7
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 187 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
164
Mixed:
17
Negative:
6
Watch Now
Buy On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
4
vanveraJan 9, 2006
Too much confused. just a little bit shocking view. in any sense.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
4
MichaelD.Jun 5, 2007
This movie was exceptionally bad. Though the acting was passable (especially Kris Kristofferson) the unbelievability of the plot was too much to bear. Time travel from mind drugs? Some things can be changed in the past and some things This movie was exceptionally bad. Though the acting was passable (especially Kris Kristofferson) the unbelievability of the plot was too much to bear. Time travel from mind drugs? Some things can be changed in the past and some things can't? There's no way of determining it? The "avant-garde" aspects were just a reminder of why a lot of people can't stand avant-garde. It makes no sense. But not in an interesting way, just a senseless way. The only reason I didn't give it a zero is because of the credits song by Roger Eno. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful