The Wonder

Netflix | Release Date: November 2, 2022

6.8	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 37 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

alejandro970Dec 3, 2022

The well-known duel between science and superstition is resolved correctly, avoiding any detail that seems malicious or stereotyped, which is appreciated, especially for the period atmosphere, and the performances.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

katezoeNov 17, 2022

Captivating film dealing with issues of faith and abuse. Florence Pugh does a magnificent acting job. One of the better films of 2022.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

RatedRexDec 1, 2022

Fine acting. Good storytelling. But yet another tale with a bizarre subject matter. This is sort of an anti-religion film. It subtly tackles humans' need to believe in something, even if it's nonsensical.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

bertobellamyNov 17, 2022

'The Wonder' plays like 'The Power of the Dog,' but what results is inferior. The conflict — between skepticism and blind faith — feels redundant, and the mystery never draws you in totally, unlike in Jane Campion's film, where ambiguity was'The Wonder' plays like 'The Power of the Dog,' but what results is inferior. The conflict — between skepticism and blind faith — feels redundant, and the mystery never draws you in totally, unlike in Jane Campion's film, where ambiguity was everything. Still, Sebastian Lelio's new movie has good acting — I was especially surprised by Kila Lord Cassidy's role —, astounding photography, and great production design. Just wished the story had the power to keep you wanting for more.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

mabritecNov 19, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Un titulo que busca destacar el fanatismo religioso, en una epoca donde la mujer como individuo de pocas libertades trata de resolver el paradigma que le presenta el consejo, la familia y la religion, pero sin llegar a destacar en ningun punto, es un titulo que no recomendaria, es aburrido predecible y monotono. NO LO RECOMIENDO 1HORA Y 49 MINUTOS PERDIDOS.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

Badgerryan27Nov 19, 2022

I like period pieces, they are some of my favorite type of films. This movie is very unique. I’ve never seen any type of plot like this and it’s completely original. With top notch acting and a good plot this is one to remember for some time.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

Brent_MarchantJan 6, 2023

Though atmospheric to a fault, writer-director Sebastián Lelio’s meditation on reason vs. spirituality/mysticism struggles to effectively capture the innate essence of this age-old debate, frequently leaving viewers “wondering” where thisThough atmospheric to a fault, writer-director Sebastián Lelio’s meditation on reason vs. spirituality/mysticism struggles to effectively capture the innate essence of this age-old debate, frequently leaving viewers “wondering” where this story is headed. Set in 1862 Ireland, the film follows the experience of an English nurse (Florence Pugh) assigned to observe a spiritually oriented 11-year-old “miracle child” (Kíla Lord Cassidy) to determine how she has been able to survive in seemingly good health for months without eating, a claim that has made her the object of considerable public curiosity and scrutiny. The investigation subsequently raises numerous theoretical, philosophical and religious questions (many of which aren’t satisfactorily answered) while simultaneously revealing much about the past of both nurse and patient and documenting the inquisitiveness of the outside world as seen through the lens of a determined journalist (Tom Burke). However, the narrative underlying this ambitious undertaking doesn’t come across as being completely convincing; it often feels thin and underdeveloped, with an uneasy sense of its own inherent viability. That becomes especially apparent in several strange, out-of-place filmed segments and voiceover narrations in which the audience is being urged into believing in the merits of this story to the same degree as the performers who have signed on to appear in the movie (talk about a hard sell). Given the strength of Pugh’s fine performance and the picture’s excellent production values, it’s disappointing that the filmmaker seems so obviously unsure about what he has come up with in this picture, and, in light of Lelio’s track record with fine works like “A Fantastic Woman” (2017) and “Disobedience” (2017), I can’t help but “wonder” what drew the director to this somewhat flimsy material in the first place. Indeed, considering my interest in the subject matter, I probably cut this one more slack than I realistically should have, and my overall rating could be seen as generous. Here’s hoping better projects are in the works moving forward.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Mauro_LanariNov 18, 2022

(Mauro Lanari)
The mother is the best example not of religious fanaticism but of Christian coherence, just as her laconic explanation is the best example of "De civitate Dei" (Augustine 413-426), which is based on two evangelical hinges: 1)(Mauro Lanari)
The mother is the best example not of religious fanaticism but of Christian coherence, just as her laconic explanation is the best example of "De civitate Dei" (Augustine 413-426), which is based on two evangelical hinges: 1) "My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36); 2) Satan is "the prince of this world" (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11). It is one of the many religions or spiritualities that, failing to save immanence, invented a pluriverse where the "Way, Truth and Life" exists in a parallel dimension, the so-called empirically undemonstrable "transcendence". Today we would say: "to throw the ball into the stand". Havin' clarified this, novel and film try to support a highly questionable idea: "the wonder" would consist not in an early death but in a death according to the statistical norm. Already towards the V century BC both the Qohelet (verses 4:2–3: "And I thought the dead, who have already died, more fortunate than the living, who are still alive; but better than both is the one who has not yet been, and has not seen the evil deeds that are done under the sun"), both Sophocles ("Oedipus at Colonus", verse 1225: "Not to be born at all is best, far best that can befall. Next best, when born, with least delay to trace the backward way") shown themselves capable of claming exactly the opposite.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

royalguy07Dec 8, 2022

Pretty well structured and managed throughout, Pugh was great as always. I do have to say whatever 4th wall stuff they were doing went completely over my head.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

alanpotter17Dec 12, 2022

É só mais um filme que capricha nos figurinos, na construção da atmosfera, mas o roteiro não decola. É tudo muito enquadrado demais. Ao menos Pugh está excepcional, como não é novidade.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews