Summary:Whether you love him or hate him, there is no question that George W. Bush is one of the most controversial public figures in recent memory. In an unprecedented undertaking, acclaimed director Oliver Stone is bringing the life of our 43rd President to the big screen as only he can. W. takes viewers through Bush’s eventful life -- hisWhether you love him or hate him, there is no question that George W. Bush is one of the most controversial public figures in recent memory. In an unprecedented undertaking, acclaimed director Oliver Stone is bringing the life of our 43rd President to the big screen as only he can. W. takes viewers through Bush’s eventful life -- his struggles and triumphs, how he found both his wife and his faith, and of course the critical days leading up to his decision to invade Iraq. [Lionsgate]…Expand
Eight years of Bush is not enough! Americans like me love this movie because we demand more wars, a bigger deficit, and a president as intelligent as Bush who is buying up more private sectors than a communist regime! Those who hate this film are
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AlexH
Oct 18, 2008
The reviews seem to be mixed, first of all, because lots of critics are automatically suspicious of Oliver Stone, as they have been for years. But "W" doesn't include much of the speculative ('unofficial history') material characteristic of "JFK" and to a lesser extent The reviews seem to be mixed, first of all, because lots of critics are automatically suspicious of Oliver Stone, as they have been for years. But "W" doesn't include much of the speculative ('unofficial history') material characteristic of "JFK" and to a lesser extent "Nixon". Secondly, everyone has their own strong opinion of Bush and what a movie about him should be like in terms of its political slant. Those in his devoted ~20% fan base won't be happy, but neither will liberals eager to see an angry hit piece. The film is a real, human drama that is both funny and tragic, and focuses primarily on the relationship between father and son. But while I'll argue that the film is generally accurate and sympathetic, I won't say it's entirely unbiased or apolitical. Two sequences seem for me to be especially relevant to the current election: W's reaction to his loss in a 1978 congressional race ('I'll never be out-Texaned or out-Christianed again') and Cheney's explanation of his real motives for invading and occupying Iraq.…Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
patrickh.
Oct 14, 2008
Conflicted but entertaining.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
Rea
Oct 25, 2008
I was hooked by the trailer and Director Oliver Stone's reputation. Both disappointed. Though the image was painstakingly crafted to show characters, there was a lack of spirit moving through it. It was basic 'ambulance chasing'..Jerry Springer material. It struck me as low I was hooked by the trailer and Director Oliver Stone's reputation. Both disappointed. Though the image was painstakingly crafted to show characters, there was a lack of spirit moving through it. It was basic 'ambulance chasing'..Jerry Springer material. It struck me as low level made-for-TV rather than incisive film making. About an hour into it, I wondered if someone bought off or threatened Stone to do that script, which didn't even begin to scratch the surface of the truths around that family and their politics. Brolin's portrayal was terrific, but the script was so devoid of any real meat, he didn't have enough to work with. Why were W's inner conflicts and demons displayed like dirty laundry without addressing where the dirt came from? This was like a Jerry Springer invites Geo to his show. I imagine there are compelling reasons for Stone to not go beyond painting a sort of distorted Lord's Supper casting W surrounded by his own 'disciples', but I was hoping for something that was less a shallow marionette show of exquisitely crafted puppets for more of HOW this man came to be in that office and WHY. The film was too one-dimensional for me. We are not fully described by our image/presentation--we are also described by the effects we produce, and our relationships. Stone hinted l at the relationships but didn't allow the supporting cast much range to show his reflection-effect in them. Real statements about that vs. constant harping on his mannerisms and weaknesses was the contribution I was looking for...and didn't find.…Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
MikeD.
Oct 23, 2008
Nothing particularly enlightening about the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
Gracef.
Oct 15, 2008
Whens there gonna be a good Oscar movie this year? W. Is awful, and I'm letdown by the movie but also by the poor effor great filmakers have been putting into lately.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
PaulS.
Oct 10, 2008
When will people stop giving Oliver Stone money to make movies. Given the subject material he totally fails to do it justice. A five year old with a camera could make Bush look bad, yet somehow Stone manages to bungle it. And more importantly, go to the movies to be entertained, which this When will people stop giving Oliver Stone money to make movies. Given the subject material he totally fails to do it justice. A five year old with a camera could make Bush look bad, yet somehow Stone manages to bungle it. And more importantly, go to the movies to be entertained, which this movie totally failed to do.…Expand